Poster | Thread |
Boot_WB
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 26-May-2015 9:54:02
| | [ #701 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 14-Feb-2006 Posts: 1134
From: Kingston upon Hull, UK | | |
|
| @itix
Hmmm... thinking on, is there a list of the subset of 68k installer commands that are problematic with MorphOS installer, or vice versa? (Is it that simple?)
If so a simple search-based wrapper script could easily be used to automatically choose which installer to use. _________________ Troll - n., A disenfranchised former potential customer who remains interested enough to stay informed and express critical opinions. opp., the vast majority who voted silently with their feet. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 26-May-2015 16:22:39
| | [ #702 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 26-May-2015 17:09:22
| | [ #703 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @Boot_WB
Quote:
Hmmm... thinking on, is there a list of the subset of 68k installer commands that are problematic with MorphOS installer, or vice versa? (Is it that simple?)
|
I dont think so but if there are problematic 68k Installer commands just report them to the bug tracker _________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KingKong
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 14-Jun-2015 14:54:29
| | [ #704 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 21-Oct-2006 Posts: 95
From: Germany | | |
|
| Update of some broken links in this thread (sorry, only in German): Lieber mehr echte universelle Rechenleistung bis hin zur KI Wie wäre es mit einem 40 Bit Computer? KISS Universal-CPU/SoC Sehr bedenklich eine Frage und die Lösung Das ist genial + Der Erfolg ist quasi garantiert Lieber mehr echte universelle Rechenleistung bis hin zur KI
Three new postings, relating to AI (sorry, only in German but I think it's worth reading): neuronale KI sind eine gefährliche Fehlentwicklung Mensch und KI Problemerkennung, wie Menschen schlechte NKI und Effizienzsteigerung
You may wonder, what AmigaOS has to do with AI (artificial intelligence) ... well, right now not much but these are very important thoughts of general interest and to make AmigaOS a leading operating system, one needs to have the right world view. AmigaOS must become a real alternative or it'll soon be history ... and if AmigaOS is a real alternative than it could play a role in AI-development. A 48 bit computer could be more efficient than a 64 bit computer and thus a 48 bit computer can play an important role in AI-development and who say that A-EON/AmigaOS couldn´t have a 48 bit computer one day? Sometimes great things start with great thoughts (and if you think, these are not than just bring some).
If you are not interested, if you can't cope, just ignore this. Don't waste time complaining, there are already enough troll-postings in this thread. Thanks.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kolla
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 6:09:10
| | [ #705 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 3146
From: Trondheim, Norway | | |
|
| @KingKong
Yeah, the Amiga could need some more intelligence, artificial and otherwise.
So let us asume you have a 48bit computer and you want to build an OS for it, how do you do that? What software do you use to build the OS for your new 48bit architecture? Obviously you would need to build backends to various popular compilers, or do you expect people to code assembler for it? How would you boot strap the development? How will you port software buildt for either 32bit or 64bit to a 48bit architecture? _________________ B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Thorham
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 7:30:02
| | [ #706 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 5-Mar-2014 Posts: 183
From: Unknown | | |
|
| What on earth is the point of 48 bit anyway? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KingKong
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 18:37:38
| | [ #707 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 21-Oct-2006 Posts: 95
From: Germany | | |
|
| Firstly: good experts have to analyse the details and have to find out the optimal solution/design ...
... but the general idea is: A 48 bit system could be better than a 64 bit system, if 48 bit are enough and 64 bit are not working to capacity.
2^48 = ca. 2,8 * 10^14 = 280.000.000.000.000 ... and that's pretty much, for instance ca. 280 terabytes. Yeah, supercomputers use more memory but that hasn't to be all in the same addressspace.
A 48 bit system could be pretty much compatible to 32 bit and 64 bit - this may be somewhat unefficient and slower but not so much.
A 48 bit system could have 96 bit integer (hardware supported calculation but with 48 bit data bus).
A 48 bit system could have 6 byte and 12 byte floating point (hardware supported calculation but with 48 bit data bus).
A 48 bit system has 16 bit less than a 64 bit system and that saves transistors and energy.
AmigaOS is more or less 32 bit - an upgrade to 48 bit shouldn't be so difficult, at least possible.
All software could be recompiled and obviously there should be some kind of a 32 bit compatibility mode.
The biggest problem is the hardware - development could be quite expensive but if it is better than 64 bit, it's worth the effort. The system should at first use conventional DRAM (what's on the market).
If that was too easy, here is a problem: how could ECC be integrated? ECC is very important - remember: AmigaOS and harware must be first class usable for military, industry and so on.
Is it better, to have a 40 bit data bus with 8 bit ECC? This could break the byte-system, could lead to 10, 20, 40, 80 bit data types and 5 or 10 byte floating point. So what? Why not? It's more than a 32 bit system and 32 bit still aren't bad.
This may be a big chance for Amiga, because no big player would give up 64 bit ... but 48 bit could be a very good idea: this could lead to a more efficient system, even with pretty much ECC ... and if this isn't a great idea, than what is? (imho, as ever)
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 18:46:01
| | [ #708 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3984
From: Germany | | |
|
| @KingKong: the problem is that you know of computer science the same as I know of do-it-yourself... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kronos
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 19:13:24
| | [ #709 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2648
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @cdimauro
Quote:
cdimauro wrote: @KingKong: the problem is that you know of computer science the same as I know of do-it-yourself... |
Do you know the difference between a screwdriver and a hammer ?
Your analogy has failed if the answer is yes._________________ - We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet - blame Canada |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 19:59:21
| | [ #710 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3984
From: Germany | | |
|
| @Kronos: I haven't said that my knowledge is zero. Just a little bit above, like Epsilon for mathematicians. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
saimon69
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 20:19:26
| | [ #711 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Dec-2007 Posts: 307
From: Los Angeles, CA | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
BrianHoskins
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 21:29:57
| | [ #712 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 4-Jan-2003 Posts: 727
From: South Wales, UK | | |
|
| @cdimauro
Quote:
cdimauro wrote: @Kronos: I haven't said that my knowledge is zero. Just a little bit above, like Epsilon for mathematicians. |
I think he was trying to say that if you know even the slightest thing about DIY (the difference between a hammer and a screwdriver) that's still more than 48-bit guy knows about computer science. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kolla
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 22:51:59
| | [ #713 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 3146
From: Trondheim, Norway | | |
|
| @KingKong
Quote:
KingKong wrote:
remember: AmigaOS and harware must be first class usable for military, industry and so on.
|
The old EULA for Amiga IIRC explicitly prohibits use of Amiga technologies for military purposes, it was a system made by and for hippies and alternative people, remember... "leftists" ;)_________________ B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 15-Jun-2015 23:27:29
| | [ #714 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2163
From: Australia | | |
|
| Oh boy.
Greatest display of ignorance ever. Not sure if this thread is funny or sad.
Poor guy seems incapable of understanding that he has no understanding of which he speaks, then thinks people are trolling when they (justifyable) scoff.
Only Amiga makes it possible. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kolla
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 16-Jun-2015 0:25:33
| | [ #715 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 3146
From: Trondheim, Norway | | |
|
| Well, in all fairness, computers with odd databus widths, like 12bit, 24bit and 36bit, but this was always done for sake of saving - going 48bit now just makes little sense, you would just end up with a system that for most practical purposes is 32bit, since most (if not all) modern" data structures (software as well as data) are typically multiples or simple fractions of 32bit.
For example an IPv6 address is 128bit, and is typically stored and treated as two 64bit entities, or four 32bit entities - in a 48bit world, it would be many options, but none optimal nor obvious - bits would be wasted. _________________ B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Trekiej
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 16-Jun-2015 2:53:08
| | [ #716 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 17-Oct-2006 Posts: 890
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @KingKong
I wish I could remember the site that talked about a 40 or 48 bit system. It sounded like it could do all that we needed in a computer system. _________________ John 3:16 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 16-Jun-2015 5:36:52
| | [ #717 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3984
From: Germany | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 16-Jun-2015 5:49:24
| | [ #718 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3984
From: Germany | | |
|
| @kolla
Quote:
kolla wrote: Well, in all fairness, computers with odd databus widths, like 12bit, 24bit and 36bit, but this was always done for sake of saving - going 48bit now just makes little sense, you would just end up with a system that for most practical purposes is 32bit, since most (if not all) modern" data structures (software as well as data) are typically multiples or simple fractions of 32bit.
For example an IPv6 address is 128bit, and is typically stored and treated as two 64bit entities, or four 32bit entities - in a 48bit world, it would be many options, but none optimal nor obvious - bits would be wasted. |
Right. That's why he has to show us how to solve all such kind of problems, starting from this 48-bit architecture up to the applications that have to be written or changed to take advantage (or at least to limit the problems) of it.
The first thing is to define the types hierarchies. If a 48-bit is the "equivalent" of "long long" aka 64-bit integer, I can suppose that an integer (or long, assuming they are the same; it depends on the ABI) is 24-bit, a short is 12-bit, and a char... 6 bits?!?
But it 48-bit is an integer/long, well, such architecture will not so much efficient as it was depicted.
And the same for floats.
Anyway, it's up to the guy, which has expressed such weird idea, to show how it works "in the real world".Last edited by cdimauro on 16-Jun-2015 at 06:10 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
resle
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 16-Jun-2015 6:33:42
| | [ #719 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 28-Nov-2005 Posts: 500
From: shanghai | | |
|
| @fishy_fis
Quote:
Greatest display of ignorance ever. Not sure if this thread is funny or sad.
Poor guy seems incapable of understanding that he has no understanding of which he speaks, then thinks people are trolling when they (justifyable) scoff.
|
What's sad is that rather than just ignoring him (the ideal reaction) or replying him with a face-palm (the understandable reaction), a bunch of people is even attempting to argue about what he says... and here you go, yet another utterly pointless thread.
But I actually envy this guy's candor, which once would have left me furious... ...except for a couple outstandingly irritating behaviors:
1) The slew of links to unrelated stuff he banters about here and there... in german.
2) That lecturer's tone he always uses... "ECC is very important - remember: AmigaOS and harware must be first class usable for military, industry and so on."
.....REMEMBER! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: How to make AmigaOS a leading operating system? Posted on 16-Jun-2015 8:08:22
| | [ #720 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| @kolla
>The old EULA for Amiga IIRC explicitly prohibits use of Amiga technologies for military purposes
Since when? I've used Amiga powered military device in 1991. Last edited by KimmoK on 16-Jun-2015 at 08:08 AM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|