That's nice for them, but how is this news related to Amiga computers?
I would rather read Amiga related news here.

Kind regards,

Dennis

Well Denis, it got posted so the moderator thinks it was important/related. But I guess you'd rather not see IBM making PPC's using 65nm tech....

It's called progress, what Intel invents is just as important to us as if IBM invented it.

_________________
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you..
~

This is the next milestone beyond 90nm, Intel and IBM/AMD have been working on it since before 90nm was fully functional and IBM is allready talking up 45nm

This is the next milestone beyond 90nm, Intel and IBM/AMD have been working on it since before 90nm was fully functional and IBM is allready talking up 45nm

Also note the part about "leakage". Shrinking is one thing, but also increasing transistor performance is (imo) somethinge else.

_________________
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you..
~

Quote:

It's called progress, what Intel invents is just as important to us as if IBM invented it.

Besides, my dad can beat up your dad anyday.

_________________
ExecSG Team Lead

Besides, my dad can beat up your dad anyday.

Well, really, that's not so difficult... My dad ain't big

Perhaps I was a bit agressive.

_________________
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you..
~

@seer

> Well Denis, it got posted so the moderator thinks it was
> important/related. But I guess you'd rather not see IBM
> making PPC's using 65nm tech....

I didn't say it wasn't important, I just don't understand how an anouncement by Intel affects the Amiga 'community'.

> It's called progress, what Intel invents is just as
> important to us as if IBM invented it.

I don't agree with you. What IBM invents could end up in an AmigaOne someday. What Intel invents can only affect the Amiga in an indirect way, as Intel stuff is not used any Amiga (AFAIK). (I do have some zorro boards with AMD chips.)

Kind regards,

Dennis

I don't agree with you. What IBM invents could end up in an AmigaOne someday. What Intel invents can only affect the Amiga in an indirect way, as Intel stuff is not used any Amiga (AFAIK). (I do have some zorro boards with AMD chips.)

Intel made a big step forward in chip processing, it's not about Intel, it's about technology. If it was IBM who was the first to get 65nm chips then it counts as news ?

Back in the good old days we read about Atari news. By your reasoning what Atari did wouldn't affect us as well, as it would never be used in our Amigas.

Intel is a big player in this market, what Intel does surely is important to IBM/Motorola as well even if they don't make x86 chips, but they sure will look at this and make use of it sooner or later. If not, they'll fall behind.

Besides, maybe some of the memory chips you use are made by intel. Then this news is related if you read it.

_________________
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you..
~

> Intel made a big step forward in chip processing,
> it's not about Intel, it's about technology.

OK, I get it now. Sorry if I was a little slow to understand.

Kind regards

Dennis

Sorry if I was a little slow to understand.

Hey, you're a cheesehead like me, you're forgiven

_________________
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you..
~

@A3000T

Quote:

I don't agree with you. What IBM invents could end up in an AmigaOne someday. What Intel invents can only affect the Amiga in an indirect way, as Intel stuff is not used any Amiga (AFAIK). (I do have some zorro boards with AMD chips.)

Intel invented PCI. Intel invented USB. (Neither of which is
affected by this announcement)

_________________
Tony T.

People who generalize are always wrong.


1989 - 500 / 1991 - 3000 / 1997 - Genesis Flyer 1200T / 2003 - A1XE

@digitaldisaster

Quote:

This is the next milestone beyond 90nm, Intel and IBM/AMD have been working on it since before 90nm was fully functional and IBM is allready talking up 45nm

"fully functional"
Last I was aware, Intel, IBM, and AMD weren't 'quite' up to 100
percent yield on their 90nm processes. There don't seem to be many
3.6GHz P4s available even now, and 3.4s still are priced quite a bit
more than the 3.2GHz parts. (Let's not talk about the EEs)

I don't expect a whole lot of 65nm parts much before the end of 2005.

_________________
Tony T.

People who generalize are always wrong.


1989 - 500 / 1991 - 3000 / 1997 - Genesis Flyer 1200T / 2003 - A1XE

The fabs are fully functional in the sense that they are churning out chips for production use. No fab ever acheives 100% yields, impurities in silicon ensure that. I can't remember off the top of my head (And it's too alte to go and look it up) but I suspect most don't go above 60%, at least not consistantly.

One that relates to AMD/IBM 65 nm processes refer to http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20040813040951.html

Since AMD/IBM are partners i.e. one could guess the next IBM's PPC development. PPC970 and AMD64 seem to be running near parallel with each other.

_________________
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB RAM, GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
Amiga 1200 (Rev 1D1, KS 3.2, PiStorm32lite/RPi 4B 4GB/Emu68)
Amiga 500 (Rev 6A, KS 3.2, PiStorm/RPi 3a/Emu68)

@A3000T

One could include AC97, AGP, PCI-Express and X86 ISA**.
**A1?s Uboot BIOS carries a light weight X86 emulator for PCI initialization (recalling)...

_________________
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB RAM, GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
Amiga 1200 (Rev 1D1, KS 3.2, PiStorm32lite/RPi 4B 4GB/Emu68)
Amiga 500 (Rev 6A, KS 3.2, PiStorm/RPi 3a/Emu68)

That web page seriously screwed up my eyes. WHITE ON BLACK TEXT ARRGGHHH. im gunna b seein lines on everythin for the rest of the day now grrrr