Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
13 crawler(s) on-line.
 157 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 kriz:  15 mins ago
 amigakit:  18 mins ago
 kolla:  25 mins ago
 Karlos:  39 mins ago
 matthey:  44 mins ago
 Rob:  45 mins ago
 minator:  52 mins ago
 AMIGASYSTEM:  58 mins ago
 NutsAboutAmiga:  1 hr 5 mins ago
 Kronos:  1 hr 52 mins ago

hardware OS4   hardware OS4 : AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
   posted by Insanity on 22-Jan-2007 6:53:58 (8806 reads)
The around-here-not-unheard-of Jeremy Reimer, has conducted a new review of AmigaOS 4, with final update.

Read it here.

Read the original article on micro-AmigaOne and AmigaOS 4 Prerelease Update 1 here.
    

STORYID: 3574
Related Links
· More about hardware OS4
· News by Insanity


Most read story about hardware OS4
20 Answers with Alan Redhouse of Eyetech

Last news about hardware OS4
Sam460LE updates
Printer Friendly Page  Send this Story to a Friend

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 )

PosterThread
Simon 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 7:58:50
#1 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 16-Feb-2005
Posts: 999
From: Antwerp / Belgium

nice review, I only haven my doubts what is stated about virusses and malware. It existed in the past on Amiga so I fear it will return in some day. Altough not so extensive like on windowsplatforms.


_________________
- Proud Member Of The Belgian Amigaclub Since 2003 -

The Belgian Amiga Club on FACEBOOK !

The Belgian Amiga Club Website

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pixie 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 9:24:27
#2 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Mar-2003
Posts: 3373
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal

All in all it was a good article. It present a very good picture of the platform, which is really a nice to have and very well worth it


_________________
Indigo 3D Lounge, my second home.
The Illusion of Choice | Am*ga

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
The_Editor 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 11:45:57
#3 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 7-Mar-2003
Posts: 7629
From: 192.168.0.02 ..Pederburgh .. Iceni

"Whats the TFB"


mwahahahaha... It's the sensible voice of computing !!


hehe


_________________
******************************************
I dont suffer from Insanity - I enjoy it

******************************************

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
jmbattle 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 12:24:16
#4 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 31-May-2005
Posts: 277
From: Hamamatsu, Japan

What about old 'classic' OS viruses, abusing Petunia?

Cheers,
James
x

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Chip 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 12:39:13
#5 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 4-Mar-2005
Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary

@jmbattle:
Good luck for them with the new memory manager.

Last edited by Chip on 22-Jan-2007 at 12:39 PM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Laser 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 12:46:32
#6 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 19-Jul-2003
Posts: 333
From: Norwich, UK

Ye Gods! An external article that is actually balanced and objective, positioning Amiga where it's aimed!

I'd seen so many "reviews" of Amiga or OS4 lately that reviewed it as a wannabe M$-killer or focussed purely on an inability to perform some specific action that I'd lost hope of anyone giving it a fair look. The fact that the guy managed to successfully shift his workload to it for a day is very positive, if surprising.

Aside from the slightly overstated virus thing mentioned earlier in the thread, the only point I'd raise is the discussion of memory protection. As others have pointed out until they're hoarse, adding memory protection doesn't suddenly make the applications bug-free. It just means a buggy app will bomb out with an error instead of potentially trashing the machine. i.e. It forces developers to do their jobs properly, making the system more stable. Not that this is a bad thing at all, just that we shouldn't forget all those years AmigaOS 3 and before ran happily 99% of the time if you chose the right programs to trust.

(PS: Don't take that the wrong way. I know Hyperion have spent considerable effort to improve the memory system and I for one am very pleased they have done so. Perhaps I'm just a little weary of the continual harping on about memory protection from anti-OS4 quarters.)

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Yssing 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 12:53:59
#7 ]
Super Member
Joined: 24-Apr-2003
Posts: 1103
From: Unknown

Great review... I liked it very much....

It was nice to read that, for the writer, the daily work can be doen on the amiga...

Great :)

hmmm, now I need new HW even more...


_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Richi 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 13:21:20
#8 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 25-Dec-2004
Posts: 158
From: Unknown

Nice review!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
fryguy 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 13:39:52
#9 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 6-Dec-2003
Posts: 852
From: Tinytown

Does it really take 30 minutes to install OS4? :/

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Bishop2 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 13:54:53
#10 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 26-Mar-2005
Posts: 121
From: UK

lol, i dunno but its better than the couple of hours it take to get windows setup and updated


_________________
AMD Athlon 64 4000+, 2 GB DDR500, nVidia Gefore 7800 GS+ 512 mb, Win UAE, OS 3.9.

Amiga 1200 Tower, Apollo 68040 16mb, Mediator PCI, Voodoo 2 Banshee 16mb, OS 3.5

Micro A1-c 512 MB, onboard Radeon 7000 32mb, OS 4 Final.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
DaveAE 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 13:56:54
#11 ]
Super Member
Joined: 21-Mar-2003
Posts: 1091
From: The Netherlands

Quote:
Does it really take 30 minutes to install OS4? :/

Definately not for me. More like 10 minutes.


_________________
Audio Evolution
http://www.audio-evolution.com

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rogue 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 14:11:12
#12 ]
OS4 Core Developer
Joined: 14-Jul-2003
Posts: 3999
From: Unknown

Quote:
Not that this is a bad thing at all, just that we shouldn't forget all those years AmigaOS 3 and before ran happily 99% of the time if you chose the right programs to trust.


It isn't so much about the user. The user has nothing to fear (except malicious programs) when a developer has done his job right. However, memory protection helps the developer, which is the reason why it should be available.

And of course, malicious code is always problematic.


_________________
Seriously, if you want to contact me do not bother sending me a PM here. Write me a mail

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Chip 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 14:32:42
#13 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 4-Mar-2005
Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary

@fryguy:

Don't know how did he managed to 30 mins, but I was always finished less than 10 minutes during my testing. Maybe his CD-ROM drive were too slow?
I'm just guessing.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
ssolie 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 15:14:54
#14 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Mar-2003
Posts: 2755
From: Alberta, Canada

I think it is a balanced review myself. AmigaOS 4.0 is quite an achievement, especially under the circumstances, and it is great to see the team's hard work confirmed with a good review.

The future is still a really big question mark with various hardware supply efforts going on in the background. Even with hardware availability I wonder how many users and developers can be gained. The Amiga brand acid test has yet to be attempted.


_________________
ExecSG Team Lead

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Petah 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 15:34:54
#15 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 10-Mar-2003
Posts: 432
From: EU <3 ❤️

Quote:
However, memory protection helps the developer, which is the reason why it should be available.

Also, I think it goes without saying that tools such as Enforcer and Mungwall have historically showed that the development of stable software capable of leaving an open system untouched is in fact feasible. Although a complete protection scheme may be useful in some cases, I for one maintain that properly written programs that adhere a good development design is the way to go. Looking for shelter under an MMU protective umbrella will never justify writing poorly written software. No matter how waterproof it is, it will still rain on top of it so to speak.


_________________
That'll Put Marzipan In Your Pie Plate, Bingo
💻 Pro-Amiga, 🌍 Pro-Globalism, 🍅 Pro-Vegan, 🛦 Pro-NATO & 🇪🇺 Pro-Joint EU Defense Intervention Initiative

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Gopal 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 15:56:19
#16 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 15-Apr-2003
Posts: 196
From: Norway

@fryguy

I guess he connected both CD-ROM and HD to the one and only available ordinary IDE port (the other one is a 44 pin laptop style connector). If connected to separate Channels you get +/- 10 min. install time.


_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
MobbyG 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 16:12:53
#17 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 7-May-2003
Posts: 203
From: In the Hizzzeeww!

The author said he considers himself an Amigan. Population +1!


_________________
Follow the Amiga Roundtable Podcast on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/amized
AmiZed Studios Website - Amiga Roundtable * Carrier Whistle * NewsTek

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Hans 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 16:37:16
#18 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 27-Dec-2003
Posts: 5098
From: New Zealand

@Petah

While it is true that developing stable software that leaves an open system untouched, not everyone does it. Also, a good memory protection system can close the door to a number of possible malware exploits that might otherwise be available. I'd say memory protection is important because, while I strive to write safe legal code, one can't control the quality of everything a user tries to run on his/her machine.


_________________
Join the Kea Campus - upgrade your skills; support my work; enjoy the Amiga corner.
https://keasigmadelta.com/ - see more of my work

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
fryguy 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 18:00:09
#19 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 6-Dec-2003
Posts: 852
From: Tinytown

@DaveAE, Chip, Gopal:

Ok, maybe he had a really slow CDrom then.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
ssolie 
Re: AmigaOS 4 review on Arstechnica.
Posted on 22-Jan-2007 18:09:09
#20 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Mar-2003
Posts: 2755
From: Alberta, Canada

@fryguy
Quote:
Ok, maybe he had a really slow CDrom then.

Here's an insane idea. Just email the guy and ask.


_________________
ExecSG Team Lead

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle