@Seer

to me it seems that hiding behind law can be the easy way Quote:

Seer wrote: @BillE Wheter you like it or not, they "Amiga Inc" who took the money is not the current Amiga Inc, just as the current Commodore is not the former Commodore, nor as the current Atari is not the former Atari.. That McEwen is involved in both.. Well, sorry, legally no problem, or else, sue him or Amiga Inc. There is nothing stopping McEwen refunding what he took. Maybe not, but, as I said, he has no legal obligation to do so. Morally maybe.

we all know it can be pretty easy to hide behind some law postulating you have the right lawyers. And it's too easy to say "they have no obligation to do so".
We are talking about credibility, just because they are so smart and found a legal hole, it's not that I personally prise or find them admirable. On the contrary they've lost credibility. Added to all the rest they stated in public forums, from my POV this credibility is almost eternally frozen to –273,15 °C; –459,67 °F.
I'm not even sure if I would stay loyal to OS4 if they're back in. Maybe if Bill would tell the truth and not some blabla fancy worded sentences referring to some previous paragraph on the last page of the before last letter he wrote 2 years back when he just came back from his barbie at 5 in the morning.
Quote:

And yes, I wouldn't mind my cash back either. I am not saying Amiga inc are angels (or that Hyperion or Eyetech are). If you believe you are entitled for a refund then take action. And no, complaining here is not taking action.

well, it's easy said wasn't there a poll some years back asking for whom would group together to file a charge against them? I for my self have not the time nor the money to pay an attorney to have legal action against some outlandish firm to get a refund for the 100Eur I paid -gullibly and lightheaded.

Don't you think?