If Amiga Inc license an Amiga branded product running it, then that act will be in breach of the terms of the Agreement, being an OS exhibiting a substantially similar software architecture
depends on what you think when saying substantially similar. It may be similar, but is it "substantially" similar? IMHO, it would be very difficult to, first define substantially similar, then prove AROS is that.
I missed your reply earlier ... I certainly agree with those points ... however to claim it is behind in every way is foolish. which was my original point =]
Tim
_________________ Support AROS sponsor a developer.
"AROS is prolly illegal ~ Evert Carton" intentionally quoted out of context for dramatic effect
0 crawler(s) on-line.
96 guest(s) on-line.
1 member(s) on-line.
WolfToTheMoon 
