|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 2-May-2003 Posts: 2097
From: Rocket City, USA | | |
|
| @Lou
Quote:
Blah blah blah, you glance over facts of the contract again that are not in your favor. Hyperion took money and applied it to outstanding debts prior to applying it to OS4 and both parties have agreed that they were still $250 short...so your view of things is wrong. Later, they were paid separately for the Artic port. That money did not go towards the original OS4 contract either. |
First of all Itec has no outstanding debts with Hyperion and the 2003 contract surely doesnt say anything about Itec paying Aminos debts. As for $250 short, not an issue for for several reasons as you well know. 1) Its only 1% which is less then the 5% threshold that Hyperion set for bookkeeping errors so it isnt a valid issue 2) Hyperion presented a receipt that implied they had in fact paid the $250 3) Hyperion has so far shown at no time when they requested the missing $250 and in fact used other reasons for not providing the OS to KMOS (we still havent paid Olaf). In additon they then asked for $7200 for the buyback and finally $8850 for the buyback both of which AI (KMOS) paid. -Tig
_________________ We played the first thing that came to our heads, it just happened to be the best song in the world. |
|