Poster | Thread |
ChrisH
 |  |
OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 17:49:34
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Jan-2005 Posts: 6679
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Is it more, or does OWB v3.21 (for OS4) feel a lot more responsive than older versions? (Maybe it happaned in v3.20 or 3.19 & I missed it because of the bugs.)
I'm tempted to guess that it was made more multi-threaded... Last edited by ChrisH on 22-Dec-2009 at 05:49 PM.
_________________ Author of the PortablE programming language. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 18:04:51
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Amiga Developer Team  |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4449
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| @ChrisH
I can't honestly say I can see a difffernce. I find OWB very useful, for those awkward sites, but you can't do anything with a webpage till it's completely loaded, includeing all javascript and images. This is very restricting as often you need to browse from a start apge to a subsequantly linked page, and in such a case you don't need to see the whole page etc. just click on the link once it's there. So if there is alsight increase once the page has loaded, it's masked by this behaviour IMHO.
But it's our best solution yet, and making constant progress....
_________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
HammerD
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 18:12:12
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 31-Oct-2003 Posts: 935
From: Ontario, Canada | | |
|
| @ChrisH
On classic I find it slower than 3.20, actually. _________________ AmigaOS 4.x Beta Tester - Classic Amiga enthusiast - http://www.hd-zone.com is my Amiga Blog, check it out! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ChrisH
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 20:08:53
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Jan-2005 Posts: 6679
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @broadblues Quote:
you can't do anything with a webpage till it's completely loaded, includeing all javascript and images |
I have to say that isn't true. I can click on links, scroll, etc while it is still loading some images (and maybe other stuff). But it does seem to need to load a lot of the page first, before rendering it, but I heard that may be due to CSS limitations (perhaps combined with OWB not loading stuff fast enough?).
I guess I was talking about noticing that I could switch tabs when the page had not finished loading._________________ Author of the PortablE programming language. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
austgarden
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 20:20:51
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 18-Oct-2004 Posts: 220
From: Norway | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
MichaelMerkel
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 20:21:43
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 9-Mar-2003 Posts: 819
From: Ilvesheim, Germany | | |
|
| @austgarden
Quote:
austgarden wrote: yes it feels a bit more responsive but i still am not able to logg inn at AW.net with it
worked well with 3.20
but no more loogginn with 3.21 just gets returned to the loggin promt
|
never got such a problem. using it right now!
regards..._________________ Michael Merkel  (Michael.Merkel@gmx.net Home) Member of Amiga-Freunde Pfalz, OS4 Welt |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ChrisH
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 20:40:32
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Jan-2005 Posts: 6679
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @austgarden Quote:
but i still am not able to logg inn at AW.net with it |
I got this problem some times. Seems to be due to a corrupt "cookie database", usually after a crash. Close OWB, delete "cookieCollection.db", and then try again with OWB._________________ Author of the PortablE programming language. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Metalheart
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 21:06:14
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2969
From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... | | |
|
| @austgarden
What the hell is that on your avatar ?? _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Moxee
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 22-Dec-2009 22:23:33
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 20-Aug-2003 Posts: 6291
From: County Yakima, WA State, USA | | |
|
| @Metalheart
You should talk. _________________ Moxee AmigaOne X1000 AmigaOne XE G4 I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Metalheart
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 0:01:42
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2969
From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... | | |
|
| @Moxee
Haha ! 
No one complained about my previous avatar though  And I thought it might be shocking to some.... _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
redfox
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 0:29:45
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 7-Mar-2003 Posts: 2095
From: Canada | | |
|
| @ChrisH
I have most of my applications on my system partition (DH0:).
OWB is updated fairly often, so when I upgrade to a newer version of OWB, I usually put the new one onto one of my other partitions until I am satisfied that it works, then I move the whole drawer over to my system partition.
With OWB 3.21 I found it runs faster from my second partition (DH1: formatted for JXFS) than from my system partition which is formatted for FFS. This may also have been the case with some of the earlier versions but I wanted to keep my working copies on my system partition.
Sometimes my system slows down to a crawl when I am using OWB 3.21. Not sure if something is munching away at RAM or if it is the usual limitations of my MicroA1 (256 MB RAM and 32 MB Video RAM).
I'm considering moving some other applications off my system partition and running a smaller cleaner system partition with the other stuff on my second partition.
--- redfox
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 0:48:38
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Amiga Developer Team  |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4449
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| @ChrisH
Quote:
I have to say that isn't true. I can click on links, scroll, etc while it is still loading some images (and maybe other stuff).
|
It is so ...
Actually it seems to depend on the page.
For a test I loaded http://blender.org and could click on links there before the main page had loaded. but at http://adsense.google.com non of the links or form elements become active till the whole page has loaded.
Last edited by broadblues on 23-Dec-2009 at 01:21 AM. Last edited by broadblues on 23-Dec-2009 at 01:21 AM.
_________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
austgarden
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 7:55:58
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 18-Oct-2004 Posts: 220
From: Norway | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
austgarden
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 7:56:59
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 18-Oct-2004 Posts: 220
From: Norway | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
danwood
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 8:14:22
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 30-Sep-2008 Posts: 1074
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ChrisH
Can't really feel any difference between it and older versions tbh.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
hotrod
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 8:48:39
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 11-Mar-2003 Posts: 3005
From: Stockholm, Sweden | | |
|
| @ChrisH
I think it feels a bit slower... also the snowflakes at amigans.net brings up CPU usage a lot... as soon as I scroll down a little bit to hide the snowflakes CPU usage gets lower again... It's allways been that way with OWB AFAIK and it's hard to tell if it's normal... I wonder if it'll be the same with timerwolf... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Metalheart
|  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 8:55:22
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2969
From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... | | |
|
| @austgarden
Ah ! But what kind of fish has those enormous kind of teeth ????
Do you have a larger version of your avatar ?
Cheers
ps, mine is a zombie hamster btw.... a christmas one, that is... _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ChrisH
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 9:27:32
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Jan-2005 Posts: 6679
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @redfox Quote:
my system partition which is formatted for FFS. |
Yuck! You really should consider moving to SFS.
Quote:
Sometimes my system slows down to a crawl when I am using OWB 3.21. Not sure if something is munching away at RAM or if it is the usual limitations of my MicroA1 (256 MB RAM and 32 MB Video RAM). |
No idea, but as you have half the video ram of my Sam440, it could be video memory running out. Have you added "video memory free" to your Workbench title bar? Then you can check if this is the case.
BTW, Update 1 is said to make video memory usage more efficient._________________ Author of the PortablE programming language. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ChrisH
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 9:30:39
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Jan-2005 Posts: 6679
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @hotrod I suspect high CPU usage because of snowflakes (heh, read that out of context!) is normal, since it's probably using Javascript heavily. _________________ Author of the PortablE programming language. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: OWB v3.21 much more responsive? Posted on 23-Dec-2009 10:56:42
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ChrisH
It feels and looks faster to me too.May be a Sam thing........... _________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|