Sure, this sommary don't like to faith Amiga, but must be done.

Here only the charts.

LAme, Mplayer e Blender




Brower Benchmark:
SunSpider 0.9.1

Benchmark Suit 8


Gallium test:
amigaworld link riferimento







Galliun in video:
Tremoulus:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz2Z5K3iToA
Unreal Tournement 2004:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PAvaBDedgY
X2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfhOzTtn_r8

Last edited by Seiya on 28-Apr-2012 at 05:59 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 27-Apr-2012 at 08:01 PM.

_________________

@Seiya

New X1000 benchmark thread without any new X1000 benchmark results?

I was lured to look as I thought there's x1000 Gallium results. :-/

And ... when we will never get nvidia support for x1000, prepare to get Radeon results also from x86.

But anyway, interesting results for x1000 alltogether, even if only one core is so far in use.

btw. some common HDDbenchmark would be nice as well (it would be more favorable towards Amiga, I think)

Last edited by KimmoK on 27-Apr-2012 at 06:24 PM.

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

@Pavlor
look better :)
X1000 benchmark are present here.
This thread is a sommary ot the other pages..

@thread
X1000 now have Debian Linux wi th, i think, alla cpu and gpu optimization and possibility to use Mesa + Gallium.
For now, a parte, a video where i saw linux loading, i don't see nothing..
A benchmark with linux now is a must!

Last edited by Seiya on 27-Apr-2012 at 06:29 PM.

_________________

@Seiya

Quote:

A benchmark with linux now is a must!

But not from me

_________________
Amiga600/Vampire2/PrismaMegaMix

@Seiya

Quote:

look better :)

You too. I wrote new X1000 benchmarks.

@pavlor

so, we have to wait some limited edition users :)

i have edit the title, because linux is available also on Sam4x0 and old AmigaOne, Pegasos 2 and Macmini so..someone could make some test on linux.

Last edited by Seiya on 27-Apr-2012 at 08:03 PM.

_________________

@Seiya

I doubt anyone is running Linux on those platforms...

_________________
Amiga Developer
Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook

@itix

I am trying to get a stable and error free Debian Squeeze installation on a Sam440ep-Flex 800mhz . Just for fun.

For the Sun spider test under Debian with Epiphany Browser
Total: 16515.9ms 12.9%

Under OS4.1 update 4 with MUI-OWB
Total: 29862.8ms +/- 0.9%


Quote:

itix wrote: @Seiya I doubt anyone is running Linux on those platforms...

_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card

@pavlor

Its pointless to post x86 gallium numbers. This has zero to do with actual real world numbers of a non existent amiga os port. Even if it was finished i'm sure the numbers wont come close to those you posted. So whats the point?

@realize

it's important to see gallium perfomance vs official driver linux and Windows.
But also to compare with Gallium on AROS in fullscreen and windowed.
One day we can see if Mesa + Gallium is better on OS4 hardware or on AROS or vs tinyGL

Last edited by Seiya on 28-Apr-2012 at 12:56 AM.

_________________

For 3D speed I will be interested:
Gallium3D speed on AOS4(PPC 0.7Ghz & 1.8Ghz) and AROS(x86 1.6Ghz & 3Ghz)

To my knowledge, we will not have Gallium3D for NVidia on AOS4.
To my knowledge, there is no Gallium3D for Radeon on AROS.
So, perhaps we need Linux Gallium for x86+HD4650 to compare driver maturity on similar HW (vs AOS4 system).

(some simple comparisson of 3D speed differences between Gallium and AMD drivers on HD4650 is enough what is nice to know for me about x86 in non-Amiga setups)

Also same for other tests if run on non-Amiga. Atom/E350 for low end and 3Ghz i3 for high end would be enough.

Last edited by KimmoK on 28-Apr-2012 at 11:14 AM.

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

@Seiya

What about HardInfo bench results under Linux ?
We can get results across machines ranging from A1,Pegs,Sam440ep,Sam460sx and -X1000 PowerPC Macs and of course Intel machines.


Computer
Summary
Computer
Processor PowerPC 440EP Rev. C (800.00MHz)
Memory 1034MB (374MB used)
Operating System Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.4
User Name
Date/Time Sat 28 Apr 2012 10:14:33 AM AST
Operating System
Version
Kernel Linux 2.6.31.5 (ppc)
Compiled #2 Tue Nov 10 23:49:28 CET 2009
C Library GNU C Library version 2.11.3 (stable)
Default C Compiler Unknown
Distribution Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.4
OpenGL
Vendor Mesa Project
Renderer Software Rasterizer
Version 2.1 Mesa 7.7.1
Direct Rendering Yes
Devices
Processor
Processor
Machine (null)
CPU PowerPC 440EP Rev. C (800.00MHz)
L2 Cache 0kB
Frequency 800.00MHz
BogoMips 1599.99
Byte Order Big Endian
NFS
Benchmarks
CPU Blowfish
CPU Blowfish
This Machine 800 MHz 86.944
Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 26.1876862
PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 172.816713
CPU CryptoHash
CPU CryptoHash
This Machine 800 MHz 12.240
CPU Fibonacci
CPU Fibonacci
This Machine 800 MHz 24.466
Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 8.1375674
PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 58.07682
CPU N-Queens
CPU N-Queens
This Machine 800 MHz 64.646
FPU FFT
FPU FFT
This Machine 800 MHz 88.107
FPU Raytracing
FPU Raytracing
This Machine 800 MHz 77.260
Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 40.8816714
PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 161.312647

Last edited by Spectre660 on 28-Apr-2012 at 02:53 PM.

_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card

@Seiya

Can I respectfully ask that you remove the benchmark for blender using my bricks_and_water_plugin.blend

1. I did not create this as benchmark rather an example of how to use plugins under the AmigaOS port of blender. I would prefer that it not misused.

2. The results are almost completely meaningless. The blendfile uses three plugins which do not come as standrad in the blender install. they are available on the net but unlikely to be installed as standard. Further to that even if said plugins were installed, the bend file refers to them by the amiga names for them (.bplug extention, rather than .so or .dll) so they will not be loaded into the blend and processed.

You may ignore 1 if you wish I have no recourse to enforce it other than your respectfullness.

However as a result of point 2 any statistic for non AmigaOS4 version of blender will be at least twice as fast as the following testifies too....

6.AV:blender> bldyn -b projects/bricks_and_water_plugin.blend -o ram:pool -F JPEG -f 0
Blender is here AV:blender/bldyn
Initialised blenderpluginapi.library
Compiled with Python version 2.5.5.
Checking for installed Python... got it!
homedir PROGDIR:.blender
could not open library PROGDIR:plugins/texture/water0.24.bplug
could not open library PROGDIR:plugins/texture/t_bricks.bplug
could not open library PROGDIR:plugins/texture/ceramictiles.bplug
Fra:1 Mem:0.19M | Preparing Scene data
Fra:1 Mem:0.35M | Preparing Scene data
Fra:1 Mem:0.35M | Creating Shadowbuffers
Fra:1 Mem:9.28M Sce: Scene Ve:104 Fa:127 La:2
Fra:1 Mem:9.28M | Creating Environment maps
Fra:1 Mem:9.28M | SSS preprocessing
Fra:1 Mem:9.28M Sce: Scene Ve:104 Fa:127 La:2
Fra:1 Mem:11.25M | Part 1-4
Fra:1 Mem:11.25M | Part 2-4
Fra:1 Mem:11.25M | Part 3-4
Fra:1 Mem:11.25M | Part 4-4
Fra:1 Mem:1.75M Sce: Scene Ve:104 Fa:127 La:2
Saved: ram:pool0001.jpg Time: 00:30.57

Blender quit
close amigalibs called
6.AV:blender> 
6.AV:blender> uname -a
AmigaOS amiga 53.10 3.5 ppc AMCC PPC440EP Sam440EP AmigaOS
6.AV:blender> 

Last edited by broadblues on 28-Apr-2012 at 04:42 PM.

_________________
BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad

@broadblues

Quote:

Saved: ram:pool0001.jpg Time: 00:30.57

Quite a different result in comparison to 65.8 s in the table.

@broadblues

ok i can remove it, but this test is used like a benchmark in other site made by other users
can you , however, make test.blend?

ì'll remove this test from any site where i posted it

Last edited by Seiya on 28-Apr-2012 at 06:02 PM.

_________________

@Seiya

Quote:

ok i can remove it, but this test is used like a benchmark in other site made by other users

Sure, you can't stop others from misusing it, I don't expect that.

Quote:

can you , however, make test.blend?

I don't have time to redo benchmarsk ATM but my results were posted here:

http://www.eofw.org/bench/index.php?sortby=6


Reasonably sure mine is number 7 on that list as it's stands at the moment.

Quote:

'll remove this test from any site where i posted it

Thank you.

_________________
BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad

@Seiya

Quote:

can you , however, make test.blend?

It was done and posted somewhere here on AW. Result of X1000 (single core, OS4, Blender 2.48) was roughly between 6-7 minutes.

@pavlor

for a realistic test any users shoud use "test.blend".

_________________

@Seiya

Quote:

for a realistic test any users shoud use "test.blend".

That was benchmark with test.blend (maybe 6.53 min if I remember correctly).