Poster | Thread |
Deniil715
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 12:59:19
| | [ #41 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-May-2003 Posts: 4236
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @fingus
Quote:
Aehm, didn´t that do SetXFerRate and SavetoNVram? |
Only after the OS4 drivers has been loaded, and those drivers are part of the kickstart, which itself is loaded using UBoot IO-functions that uses PIO0 mode. UBoot itself doesn't read these sii_* variables, unfortunately
How else would you explain that it takes 7 seconds to read 7MB or data? (Yes, the kickstart is only about 7MB, although you would expect it to be more like 70MB considering the load time.)_________________ - Don't get fooled by my avatar, I'm not like that (anymore, mostly... maybe only sometimes) > Amiga Classic and OS4 developer for OnyxSoft. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomppeli
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 13:01:43
| | [ #42 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 18-Jun-2004 Posts: 1652
From: Home land of Santa, sauna, sisu and salmiakki | | |
|
| @kas1e
Quote:
my os4 system partition are FFS, while system partioin of morphos are SFS0 |
So there was a reason to your slow booting and you wasn't doing a good comparison at all.
You should target boot time of Win 8 actually nowadays. (It boots into a sort of early menu so maybe the early startup menu of AmigaOS is equivalent and UBoot/Firmware shoudn't initialize all hardware to speed up that part as well.)
@Deniil715 Quote:
UBoot IO-functions that uses PIO0 mode. |
Last edited by Tomppeli on 20-Oct-2011 at 01:12 PM.
_________________ Rock lobster bit me. My Workbench has always preferences. X1000 + AmigaOS4.1 FE "Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system." -Seymour Cray |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 14:25:08
| | [ #43 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @kas1e The boot time are cold right? I ask because i got less than 10 seconds boot times when doing a warm reboot when i tested it on update 2. I have not checked the times on update 3, since i have hardly used the system since the update came out. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 14:29:38
| | [ #44 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @nikosidis
Quote:
Big part of the lag is the hardware/bios itself. It takes ages on my sam system before it starts even loading the kickstart. Warm reboot on the other than took about 7-10 seconds using update 2. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
asymetrix
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 15:04:07
| | [ #45 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Mar-2003 Posts: 868
From: United Kingdom | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:06:49
| | [ #46 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3549
From: Russia | | |
|
| @all
Just for sake of truth , i just use sfs0 partition (same buffers, same blocksizes for both) for booting of aos4.1u3, remove amidock from startup (just because my morphos not run any panels at startup) and comment out in kicklaout those files as voodoo.chip and sixxxxx.devices and remove from startups any assigns which was done by some 3d party progs.
Also i delete evnarcs: from all ringio files, and appdir directory (which are pretty big should to say after 1 year of using)
That all in end give me 34 seconds for booting (not 38 with ffs and amidock as before).
So, 17 seconds over 34 = 50% of differene still.
Still, of course, need just to get new fresh hdd, and do clean installs on, to avoid any tweaks and "maybe because of ..." Last edited by kas1e on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:09 PM.
_________________ Join us to improve dopus5! zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:18:21
| | [ #47 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3549
From: Russia | | |
|
| @Tomas Quote:
The boot time are cold right? I ask because i got less than 10 seconds boot times when doing a warm reboot when i tested it on update 2. I have not checked the times on update 3, since i have hardly used the system since the update came out.
|
Yes, i compare cold boots of course (after reset, but, without time to loading firmware) , just because for benchmarking of cold-boots of both oses. Soft boot are same fast as morphos's cold-boot (through, after update3 softboot also start to be slower than with update2).Last edited by kas1e on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:19 PM.
_________________ Join us to improve dopus5! zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
danwood
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:23:40
| | [ #48 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 30-Sep-2008 Posts: 1059
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Well found out maybe why my 4.1.3 install was taking so long, my hard disk died today, must have been on the way out :(
Awaiting a new 160 gig IDE drive off ebay now.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:28:18
| | [ #49 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3549
From: Russia | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:48:58
| | [ #50 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| Tried some on my 440ep & u3
57M file from SFS0 to RAM about 3s (wb drag&drop) (dopus is now 2s slower, IIRC originally with first 4.1 versions wb/dos was slower than dopus) Warm boot 13s Cold boot 9s for BIOS to start to load kickstart (includes 1s delay) at 15s kickstart is started and at 27s wb is loaded fully.
IB starts below 3 seconds RA-OWB starts in about 3s MUI-OWB starts in about 5s Netsurf starts in about 3s Timberwolf alpha .. tens of seconds?
Dopus4 below 3s Filer below 2s DiskMaster 1s AmiDVD 1s
Timed with 1s accuracy.
It would be nice if we could have cold boot accelerated more. We should try to get DMA driver to BIOS and perhaps kickstart could be loaded as one file. Not sure if the initial UBoot 9s could be reduced ... the HDD needs to spin up first anyway ... ? Or could we have a small flash device on the lattice XP expansion connector, to house the kickstart etc?
I'm very happy of AOS4.1 speed. Everything seem to start a lot faster than on my 3800+ Ubuntu system & 1,7Ghz LinuxMintLXDE system. Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 09:11 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 09:05 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:58 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:52 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:51 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:50 PM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
divina
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 21:05:29
| | [ #51 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 14-Jul-2009 Posts: 50
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 20-Oct-2011 21:15:10
| | [ #52 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3549
From: Russia | | |
|
| @divina Quote:
Yeah, same as before and as for all the others who do those quake3 tests.
Quote:
Non amiga-related, so make no sense for us at all.
Quote:
That one interesting. Seems usb2.0 on aos4 again slower than usb2.0 on morphos via the same HW/cards :)
And as i see, writing on fat32, are slower in 3 (!!) times ! 2.6mb/s on os4 vs 7.7mb/s on mos (as far as i remember , something like this was already reported on hp's forum). In other copy-tests , seems that posedeon faster on 25-70% in all the tests with usb2.
So.. One more moment which need to improve, and which can be improve. Expectually writing to fat should be improved radically.Last edited by kas1e on 20-Oct-2011 at 09:16 PM.
_________________ Join us to improve dopus5! zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
danwood
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 21-Oct-2011 20:35:24
| | [ #53 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 30-Sep-2008 Posts: 1059
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @kas1e
Quote:
Why not fresh-new one , and not ide , but sata and or sata-card, or sata-to-ide adapter ? Should be faster and better :) |
That would involve losing my DH1 and DH2 disks which are also IDE and my DVD-ROM, a replacement 3.5" IDE drive should be fine rather than change everything. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
samo79
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 10-Nov-2011 7:21:59
| | [ #54 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 13-Feb-2003 Posts: 3505
From: Italy, Perugia | | |
|
| @kas1e
Quote:
EDIT: i somehow manage to start the demo with need it settings (without touching of mouse, just from keyboard), and in 640x480 i have 30.2 fps |
Your result is a bit low for a Peg2 @ 1 Ghz
At the same 640*480 resolution/graphics details i get:
20.4 FPS on my Sam Flex 800 (Radeon 9250) 28.4 FPS on my AmigaOne G3 800 (Radeon 9200 SE)_________________ BACK FOR THE FUTURE
http://www.betatesting.it/backforthefuture
Sam440ep Flex 800 Mhz 1 GB Ram + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 AmigaOne XE G3 800 Mhz - 640 MB Ram - Radeon 9200 SE + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks) Posted on 10-Nov-2011 10:54:34
| | [ #55 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|