Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
13 crawler(s) on-line.
 86 guest(s) on-line.
 1 member(s) on-line.


 zipper

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 zipper:  4 mins ago
 AMIGASYSTEM:  6 mins ago
 pixie:  22 mins ago
 K-L:  24 mins ago
 Frank:  1 hr 3 mins ago
 clint:  1 hr 14 mins ago
 Torque:  1 hr 31 mins ago
 BigD:  1 hr 43 mins ago
 Deaths_Head:  1 hr 52 mins ago
 Gunnar:  2 hrs ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga General Chat
      /  Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )
PosterThread
Deniil715 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 12:59:19
#41 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-May-2003
Posts: 4236
From: Sweden

@fingus

Quote:
Aehm, didn´t that do SetXFerRate and SavetoNVram?


Only after the OS4 drivers has been loaded, and those drivers are part of the kickstart, which itself is loaded using UBoot IO-functions that uses PIO0 mode. UBoot itself doesn't read these sii_* variables, unfortunately

How else would you explain that it takes 7 seconds to read 7MB or data? (Yes, the kickstart is only about 7MB, although you would expect it to be more like 70MB considering the load time.)

_________________
- Don't get fooled by my avatar, I'm not like that (anymore, mostly... maybe only sometimes)
> Amiga Classic and OS4 developer for OnyxSoft.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tomppeli 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 13:01:43
#42 ]
Super Member
Joined: 18-Jun-2004
Posts: 1652
From: Home land of Santa, sauna, sisu and salmiakki

@kas1e

Quote:
my os4 system partition are FFS, while system partioin of morphos are SFS0

So there was a reason to your slow booting and you wasn't doing a good comparison at all.

You should target boot time of Win 8 actually nowadays. (It boots into a sort of early menu so maybe the early startup menu of AmigaOS is equivalent and UBoot/Firmware shoudn't initialize all hardware to speed up that part as well.)

@Deniil715
Quote:
UBoot IO-functions that uses PIO0 mode.


Last edited by Tomppeli on 20-Oct-2011 at 01:12 PM.

_________________
Rock lobster bit me. My Workbench has always preferences. X1000 + AmigaOS4.1 FE
"Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system." -Seymour Cray

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tomas 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 14:25:08
#43 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 25-Jul-2003
Posts: 4286
From: Unknown

@kas1e
The boot time are cold right? I ask because i got less than 10 seconds boot times when doing a warm reboot when i tested it on update 2. I have not checked the times on update 3, since i have hardly used the system since the update came out.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tomas 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 14:29:38
#44 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 25-Jul-2003
Posts: 4286
From: Unknown

@nikosidis

Quote:

nikosidis wrote:
Why not compare with AROS booting on ACER aspire one ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIQTRViPKLg

12 sec..

www.aspireos.com


Big part of the lag is the hardware/bios itself. It takes ages on my sam system before it starts even loading the kickstart. Warm reboot on the other than took about 7-10 seconds using update 2.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
asymetrix 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 15:04:07
#45 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 9-Mar-2003
Posts: 868
From: United Kingdom

@thread

we should be improving alot more. Windows 8 is around the corner :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG86f3WCkmk&feature=related

I also have seen a video of Windows 8 boot time 5 seconds !

_________________
Download 499.26 Mbps, 659.94 Mbps Upload :)

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kas1e 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:06:49
#46 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Jan-2004
Posts: 3549
From: Russia

@all

Just for sake of truth , i just use sfs0 partition (same buffers, same blocksizes for both) for booting of aos4.1u3, remove amidock from startup (just because my morphos not run any panels at startup) and comment out in kicklaout those files as voodoo.chip and sixxxxx.devices and remove from startups any assigns which was done by some 3d party progs.

Also i delete evnarcs: from all ringio files, and appdir directory (which are pretty big should to say after 1 year of using)

That all in end give me 34 seconds for booting (not 38 with ffs and amidock as before).

So, 17 seconds over 34 = 50% of differene still.

Still, of course, need just to get new fresh hdd, and do clean installs on, to avoid any tweaks and "maybe because of ..."

Last edited by kas1e on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:09 PM.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kas1e 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:18:21
#47 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Jan-2004
Posts: 3549
From: Russia

@Tomas
Quote:

The boot time are cold right? I ask because i got less than 10 seconds boot times when doing a warm reboot when i tested it on update 2. I have not checked the times on update 3, since i have hardly used the system since the update came out.


Yes, i compare cold boots of course (after reset, but, without time to loading firmware) , just because for benchmarking of cold-boots of both oses. Soft boot are same fast as morphos's cold-boot (through, after update3 softboot also start to be slower than with update2).

Last edited by kas1e on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:19 PM.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
danwood 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:23:40
#48 ]
Super Member
Joined: 30-Sep-2008
Posts: 1059
From: Unknown

Well found out maybe why my 4.1.3 install was taking so long, my hard disk died today, must have been on the way out :(

Awaiting a new 160 gig IDE drive off ebay now.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kas1e 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:28:18
#49 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Jan-2004
Posts: 3549
From: Russia

@danwood
Quote:

Awaiting a new 160 gig IDE drive off ebay now.

Why not fresh-new one , and not ide , but sata and or sata-card, or sata-to-ide adapter ? Should be faster and better :)

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
KimmoK 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 20:48:58
#50 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland

Tried some on my 440ep & u3

57M file from SFS0 to RAM about 3s (wb drag&drop) (dopus is now 2s slower, IIRC originally with first 4.1 versions wb/dos was slower than dopus)
Warm boot 13s
Cold boot 9s for BIOS to start to load kickstart (includes 1s delay)
at 15s kickstart is started and at 27s wb is loaded fully.

IB starts below 3 seconds
RA-OWB starts in about 3s
MUI-OWB starts in about 5s
Netsurf starts in about 3s
Timberwolf alpha .. tens of seconds?

Dopus4 below 3s
Filer below 2s
DiskMaster 1s
AmiDVD 1s

Timed with 1s accuracy.

It would be nice if we could have cold boot accelerated more. We should try to get DMA driver to BIOS and perhaps kickstart could be loaded as one file. Not sure if the initial UBoot 9s could be reduced ... the HDD needs to spin up first anyway ... ? Or could we have a small flash device on the lattice XP expansion connector, to house the kickstart etc?

I'm very happy of AOS4.1 speed. Everything seem to start a lot faster than on my 3800+ Ubuntu system & 1,7Ghz LinuxMintLXDE system.

Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 09:11 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 09:05 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:58 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:52 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:51 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 20-Oct-2011 at 08:50 PM.

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
divina 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 21:05:29
#51 ]
Member
Joined: 14-Jul-2009
Posts: 50
From: Unknown

@kas1e

hi,

first update to MorphOS2.7 or 3.0 :)
If you want update without burning cd http://www.nonsoloamiga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=129

here benchmarks about Quake3 in OSX, MorphOS2.x, AROS, AmigaOS4.x
http://www.nonsoloamiga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=131

here benchmarks about Quake4 in OSX
http://www.nonsoloamiga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=136

here simple USB2.0 test in MorphOS2.7 and AmigaOS4.1.3 (FAT32 and SFS)
http://www.nonsoloamiga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=646&start=75#p6078

regards


 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kas1e 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 20-Oct-2011 21:15:10
#52 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Jan-2004
Posts: 3549
From: Russia

@divina
Quote:

here benchmarks about Quake3 in OSX, MorphOS2.x, AROS, AmigaOS4.x
http://www.nonsoloamiga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=131

Yeah, same as before and as for all the others who do those quake3 tests.

Quote:

here benchmarks about Quake4 in OSX
http://www.nonsoloamiga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=136

Non amiga-related, so make no sense for us at all.

Quote:

here simple USB2.0 test in MorphOS2.7 and AmigaOS4.1.3 (FAT32 and SFS)
http://www.nonsoloamiga.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=646&start=75#p6078


That one interesting. Seems usb2.0 on aos4 again slower than usb2.0 on morphos via the same HW/cards :)

And as i see, writing on fat32, are slower in 3 (!!) times ! 2.6mb/s on os4 vs 7.7mb/s on mos (as far as i remember , something like this was already reported on hp's forum). In other copy-tests , seems that posedeon faster on 25-70% in all the tests with usb2.

So.. One more moment which need to improve, and which can be improve. Expectually writing to fat should be improved radically.

Last edited by kas1e on 20-Oct-2011 at 09:16 PM.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
danwood 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 21-Oct-2011 20:35:24
#53 ]
Super Member
Joined: 30-Sep-2008
Posts: 1059
From: Unknown

@kas1e

Quote:
Why not fresh-new one , and not ide , but sata and or sata-card, or sata-to-ide adapter ? Should be faster and better :)


That would involve losing my DH1 and DH2 disks which are also IDE and my DVD-ROM, a replacement 3.5" IDE drive should be fine rather than change everything.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
samo79 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 10-Nov-2011 7:21:59
#54 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 13-Feb-2003
Posts: 3505
From: Italy, Perugia

@kas1e

Quote:
EDIT: i somehow manage to start the demo with need it settings (without touching of mouse, just from keyboard), and in 640x480 i have 30.2 fps


Your result is a bit low for a Peg2 @ 1 Ghz

At the same 640*480 resolution/graphics details i get:

20.4 FPS on my Sam Flex 800 (Radeon 9250)
28.4 FPS on my AmigaOne G3 800 (Radeon 9200 SE)

_________________
BACK FOR THE FUTURE

http://www.betatesting.it/backforthefuture

Sam440ep Flex 800 Mhz 1 GB Ram + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6
AmigaOne XE G3 800 Mhz - 640 MB Ram - Radeon 9200 SE + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
KimmoK 
Re: Some comparing of morphos vs amigaos4 (benchmarks)
Posted on 10-Nov-2011 10:54:34
#55 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland

I get 2MB/sec write and 6MB sec (36% CPU usage) read with a usb memory stick & my SAM. (it's SFS, IIRC)

(noticed that on my PC I get 25MB/sec when I copy HDD to USB hard drive and the same speed with partition to partition copy. I should try the USB HDD on my SAM one day...)


About the win8 startup: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ia3zBs42cc

I wonder if they are starting a "suspended to disk" -system.
If not, it's time to get the BIOS startup to 2 seconds and OS startup below 3 seconds, especially on x1000 kind of system, SAM is allowed to boot 2s more!!!

Last edited by KimmoK on 10-Nov-2011 at 04:45 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 10-Nov-2011 at 10:56 AM.

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle