Poster | Thread |
saimon69
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 20:58:28
| | [ #121 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Dec-2007 Posts: 307
From: Los Angeles, CA | | |
|
| @Signal
Same misinterpretation of DC_Edge: as far as i remember what ARIX was, they are just using a stripped down kernel and NOT all linux cruft: no, not even the shell.
What you fear about is the usual hosted that is yes bloated because has all the linux heritage stuff.
If instead is a matter of purism (mean if is not EXEC is not an amiga-like os, is taaaaainted, impure, a monster etc.) then feel free to not use it. Last edited by saimon69 on 24-Oct-2013 at 09:06 PM. Last edited by saimon69 on 24-Oct-2013 at 09:05 PM. Last edited by saimon69 on 24-Oct-2013 at 09:03 PM. Last edited by saimon69 on 24-Oct-2013 at 09:02 PM. Last edited by saimon69 on 24-Oct-2013 at 09:02 PM. Last edited by saimon69 on 24-Oct-2013 at 08:59 PM.
_________________ Scarabocchi Binari - Italian AROS Blog Binary Doodles - English language AROS Blog |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
michalsc
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:05:39
| | [ #122 ] |
|
|
|
AROS Core Developer |
Joined: 14-Jun-2005 Posts: 377
From: Germany | | |
|
| @DC_Edge
Quote:
Linux is completely different than aOS(ses), this is a true nightmare for me, where every piece of software in absolutely un-understandable by any tech guy who has not spent 500 hours playing with the su command and any other non senses (editors with so strange shortcuts). |
Once again. Linux kernel is not the same as GNU/Linux! The "su" command *IS NOT* part of the Linux kernel. Editors with "so strange shortcuts" are neither part of the Linux kernel.
People, come on. *THINK* before you post... PLEASE....
Quote:
mac products are linux ones |
What??? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TheDungeonDelver
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:06:53
| | [ #123 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 17-Apr-2004 Posts: 815
From: Unknown | | |
|
| The tragedy of losing Amithlon as the way forward meant that a far, far easier route to better software was lost too. You could code x86 apps that ran on the Linux kernel that Amithlon ran on top of and they'd run seamlessly on the Amiga side - at least that's my understanding. Imagine a working Firefox port, for example.
_________________ The problem with AmigaOS on PPC isn't that PPC is big-endian. The problem with AmigaOS on PPC is that PPC is dead-endian. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
eliyahu
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:06:57
| | [ #124 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 3-Mar-2010 Posts: 1961
From: Waterbury, Connecticut (USA) | | |
|
| @saimon69
ah. so that's what ARIX is? AROS userland + linux kernel? nice. i'll probably stick with linux-hosted AROS because i want the GNU userland, too, but good luck with it.
how much work -- beyond a recompile -- will be required of AROS application developers to support the new underpinnings?
-- eliyahu
_________________ "Physical reality is consistent with universal laws. When the laws do not operate, there is no reality. All of this is unreal." |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
saimon69
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:08:06
| | [ #125 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Dec-2007 Posts: 307
From: Los Angeles, CA | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
terminills
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:09:42
| | [ #126 ] |
|
|
|
AROS Core Developer |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1472
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @eliyahu
is it? ;)
_________________ Support AROS sponsor a developer.
"AROS is prolly illegal ~ Evert Carton" intentionally quoted out of context for dramatic effect |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:19:49
| | [ #127 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| @drstrangelove
Quote:
It's really not that bad, and even if it was, there would be no need to apologize for it.
You should see my french...
_________________ "Unix is supposed to fix that." -- Jay Miner |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:26:25
| | [ #128 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| @Signal
Quote:
I have tried most of them.... something is either missing or just does not feel right. Yeah, 'feel'. No, I can't explain it, and for those that have forgotten or have never used AmigaOS, there is no hope of ever expressing that man AND machine feeling. |
For me it's the latency in the UI. Even if the difference is very small, it's perceptible in the "feel" of the UI. This is why I prefer LXDE to Gnome or KDE, although it's still not as good as Amiga.
AmigaOS wouldn't have been nearly as good without Intuition — hats off to RJ!_________________ "Unix is supposed to fix that." -- Jay Miner |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 21:30:47
| | [ #129 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| @DC_Edge
Quote:
Linux is almost mainstream, and thus, is really boring. |
Linux is mainstream on the server (and the phone), but still an "alternate" on the desktop. Personally, I like it that way! _________________ "Unix is supposed to fix that." -- Jay Miner |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 22:24:10
| | [ #130 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @saimon69
Quote:
If instead is a matter of purism (mean if is not EXEC is not an amiga-like os, is taaaaainted, impure, a monster etc.) then feel free to not use it. |
lets remember os4 exec *is* already foreign (who knows, what it is)..- |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 22:29:18
| | [ #131 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @eliyahu
Quote:
how much work -- beyond a recompile -- will be required of AROS application developers to support the new underpinnings? |
its not clear what do you mean. we have to do with two processes at the same time.
aros v0 -> aros v1 = api breakage, apps need recompile. aros v1 -> arix = api remains the same (apps remain safely usable on both, no recompile needed)
thus the aros application library will have to be recompiled as soon as v1 is stable anyway, while it wouldnt need to be recompiled against arix. thats how i imagine it, correctme if im wrong.Last edited by wawa on 24-Oct-2013 at 10:30 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
saimon69
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 24-Oct-2013 23:36:16
| | [ #132 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Dec-2007 Posts: 307
From: Los Angeles, CA | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
DC_Edge
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 10:01:03
| | [ #133 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 1-Oct-2003 Posts: 190
From: France | | |
|
| if i put a "general motor" motor in my peugeot car, it's a general motor based car, because the heart is a general motor one.
if i think general motor motors are bad, who ever made the tires, the glass, and every component, it's a general motor machine.
i'm sorry i'm not instructed/qualified enough to talk about linux, wether it's about a core, or a linux distro.
i'm just phd in information infrastructure, and you know, guys like you who think they are better than you just because they play with words....are the same guy who call me because they are unable to put a cisco switch up with a proper config, doesn't even know how to put an IP in an ILO card, and doesn't even know how to setup the linux servers they all defend at all. Last time a linux tech guy bored me, that was because "he was better on linux than me", and managed to broke the whole routing table "because he knows linux, but have a limited view of what is a complete infrastructure".
You should not "attack" personnaly someone you don't know about, when the subjet is about something else than personnal griefs, just playing with words.
now excuse me, I have more interessant things to do than playing with words.
Last edited by DC_Edge on 25-Oct-2013 at 10:13 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
olegil
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 12:08:25
| | [ #134 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Aug-2003 Posts: 5895
From: Work | | |
|
| @DC_Edge
Good for you that you know _something_, but the fact of the matter is that bringing cryptic command line syntaxes into a discussion of which kernel to choose is RATHER SILLY. GNU runs on AmigaOS also, it's called Geek Gadgets.
Does that make Exec bad? _________________ This weeks pet peeve: Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
terminills
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 12:37:34
| | [ #135 ] |
|
|
|
AROS Core Developer |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1472
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @DC_Edge
Quote:
if i put a "general motor" motor in my peugeot car, it's a general motor based car, because the heart is a general motor one. |
In the car world that would still be called a peugeot._________________ Support AROS sponsor a developer.
"AROS is prolly illegal ~ Evert Carton" intentionally quoted out of context for dramatic effect |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Arko
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 12:48:35
| | [ #136 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 17-Jan-2007 Posts: 1989
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @fishy_fis
Quote:
fishy_fis wrote: @Arko
Funny enough, and unless Im mistaken you cant do this with p96 under UAE, ...
. |
-----------------------
Brian King of Cloanto has done an excellent job with the his latest release of Win 32 UAE with Picasso 96 support. This latest version has a UAE Picasso 96 driver supporting 640X400 8bit, 640X480 8bit, 640x480 16bit, 800X600 8bit and 800X600 16bit workbench screens. Also support of 32 bit addressing has also been included which allows me to have virtual Amiga with an 020, graphics card, 2megs of chip ram and 16 megs of fast ram. This version of uae running on a P100 and utilizing the Picasso 96 drivers is very fast compared to a Amiga 1200 if you press scroll lock to disable the native chipset update and set the CPU emulation setting to 1 instead of the default 4.
Below are links to the captured output of the Showconfig utility included with AmigaOS 3.1 in Amiga and PC ASCII formats and a screen shot of my Workbench running in 800X600 16bit on my Uae running on my p100. http://www.geocities/SiliconValley/Park/7481/p96uaeconfig_ami.txt http://www.geocities/SiliconValley/Park/7481/p96uaeconfig_pc.txt http://www.geocities/SiliconValley/Park/7481/uaepicasso96_800x600.jpg
This version of UAE is very impressive and if they could support Amiga CD-roms with label changes that would be even better. ---- -----------------------
Source : https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.amiga.advocacy/c3YcU1pMwkk
Here is a P96 on UAE Installation Guide: http://classicwb.abime.net/classicweb/instructionsp96.htm
And UAE could call x86 native coded software: http://eab.abime.net/showthread.php?t=10235
---
I'm not a friend of Amithlon or UAE because they where not aimed for an AOS improvement but UAE can do a lot of things Amithlon could.
There is no nead to cry for Amithlon.Last edited by Arko on 25-Oct-2013 at 01:22 PM.
_________________ AmigaONE. Haha. Just because you can put label on it does not make it Amiga.
I borrowed this comments from here (#27 & #28): http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=38873&forum=2&start=20&order=0 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
IntuitionAmiga
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 13:10:53
| | [ #137 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 5-Sep-2013 Posts: 118
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @DC_Edge
OS4 uses a brand new written from scratch kernel not based on the original Exec so by your twisted logic that makes OS4 not Amiga OS.
As Olegil said, the GNU operating system runs on many different kernels not just Linux. You don't like GNU but keep confusing it with the Linux kernel for some reason. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 13:23:43
| | [ #138 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2160
From: Australia | | |
|
| @Arko
Yeah, as I said p96 is possible under UAE, but it doesn't give the direct hardware access in the same way Amithlon does.
Not suggesting that it makes it bad because of it, they're just different. Really though, the only reason I even bring these things up (and my responses to hypex) is to point out that they're different beasts and as such neither makes the other redundant. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Yo
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 14:18:59
| | [ #139 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 8-Oct-2004 Posts: 2043
From: France, on an ADSL line | | |
|
| @thread
Let's please use respect and tolerance, everyone has their own opinions. No trolling or personal attacks, as usual. Plus having a thicker-than-normal skin is always of use when putting forth an idea or point of view, I believe.
(As an aside with the 'engine-in-car reference', in the 1960's, a standard Porsche 914 had a 4-cylinder Volkswagen engine. It certainly was never referred to as a Bug, nor did it have the pricing structure of a 'People's Automobile.')
Carry on, but, again, please... think before you hit 'submit' and again before you hit A/R, not everyone has English as their Mother Tongue. I'll ask everyone to please play nicely. _________________ ¤¤ Official Hyperion Zealot ¤¤
(No, I didn't type that with a straight face.) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kronos
| |
Re: Should Linux kernel power future AOS solution ? Posted on 25-Oct-2013 14:39:49
| | [ #140 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2567
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Online! |
|
|