Poster | Thread |
Kronos
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 21-May-2015 21:14:59
| | [ #61 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2562
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @cdimauro
On machines with >1.5GB you get about 50MB more RAM than on those with exactly 1.5GB (last gen iBook and Quicksilvers max out at 1.5)
Addressspace between 1.5 and 2GB is reserved for components (mostly the GFX-card).
A more flexible approach might be possible (pushing Quark beyond 2GB, only reserving so much for GFX as really used), but it wouldn't gain you more than 250MB and it seems noone considers this a worthwhile adventure.
Edit: Actually I did a bit of x86 coding in the mid 90s and yeah you were still expected to juggle 64k segments Last edited by Kronos on 21-May-2015 at 09:17 PM.
_________________ - We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet - blame Canada |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 21-May-2015 21:20:30
| | [ #62 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3650
From: Germany | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kronos
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 21-May-2015 21:46:44
| | [ #63 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2562
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @cdimauro
Moving anthing that might get accesed by DOS beyond 2GB sounds like a desaster waiting to happen. Doing it with GFX card shoul work and would not only get nearer to 2GB of RAM but would also be helpfull for cards with more than 256MB. _________________ - We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet - blame Canada |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 21-May-2015 21:54:03
| | [ #64 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3650
From: Germany | | |
|
| @Kronos: exactly. Nowadays video cards with 2 or more GB of memory are very common, and it's unacceptable that the o.s. can only use a little part of them because of the global 2GB limit.
Another thing which I was thinking about from a long time is a RAM: device which has a fixed size and uses all remaining memory.
Other option is having a RAD: for part of the system files, leaving the rest for the above RAM:. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 21-May-2015 22:04:36
| | [ #65 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @Kronos
I think VRAM is already in > 2 GB address space and IO, too. Cant check now, though. _________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kamelito
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 21-May-2015 22:58:26
| | [ #66 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 26-Jul-2004 Posts: 815
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @itix
Is there a kind of memory map showing the 2GB limitation of RAM?
PCI space, kernel, memory buffers, video buffer, I/O, what else?
Kamelito Last edited by kamelit0 on 21-May-2015 at 11:00 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kolla
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 1:12:07
| | [ #67 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2896
From: Trondheim, Norway | | |
|
| @Chain-Q
Does the Wireless Manager support "WPA2 Enterprise", aka 802.1x etc? It is something any student would want, to hook their laptops to eduroam (http:/www.eduroam.org). _________________ B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 2:51:06
| | [ #68 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2159
From: Australia | | |
|
| Not to get drawn into any "vs." crap here, both MOS and AROS have advantages vs. each other, but c'mon? Does whoever said it really expect AROS has only 83 (or less) systems supported natively? That's crazy talk
While it doesn't have Windows, or Linux level support it is supported by quite a few chipsets spanning 20 or so years (for x86 and x86-64 alone). Number of supported systems would span into the thousands. From 486 systems through to i7's. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Raffaele
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 8:21:42
| | [ #69 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 7-Dec-2005 Posts: 1906
From: Naples, Italy | | |
|
| @Thread
More or less topics that I said to naysayers in arc of years.
Naysayers people argue that it is impossible for a small team success to port MorphOS on any X86 architecture as there were dozillions of motherboards and graphic card to support with reliable drivers.
I answered that instead it is quite simple if team decide to support only one motherboard architecture and family of graphic cards and then expand in the future.
That is more or less what Apple does with their hardware. They support with drivers only their motherboards and are stick to ATI graphic cards drivers, in order to have a stable and reliable platform OS without the hassle of support any kind of X86 architecture. Well for Apple it is even more simple as they must just make drivers for their own hardware and should concentrate efforts on graphic cards drivers only.
_________________ "When the Amiga came out, everyone [at Apple] was scared as hell." (J.L. Gassée, former CEO of Apple France and chief of devs of Mac II-fx, interviewed by Amazing Computing, Nov 1996). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ASiegel
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 11:12:39
| | [ #70 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 22-Oct-2013 Posts: 212
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @fishy_fis
Quote:
Does whoever said it really expect AROS has only 83 (or less) systems supported natively? That's crazy talk |
There is a difference between "getting something to boot somehow" and "using an officially supported system."
The MorphOS development team maintains a public list of specific systems that are considered to be compatible to MorphOS. The team officially commits to maintain compatibility for these target systems with every new release and aims to fix newly introduced incompatibilites if any are found.
With AROS, there is a system compatibility list on Wikibooks but, based on its revision history, it is not necessarily as well maintained as it could be. While the list is quite long, numerous entries refer to various degrees of incompabilities and quite a few refer to tests made with years old AROS distributions, which are hardly reliable indicators as far as more recent versions of AROS are concerned.
So, unless more effort is put into keeping its hardware compatibility lists current and complete, you can hardly blame interested parties for remaining confused regarding what specifc computing systems would be suitable for running AROS without too many restrictions. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
jacadcaps
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 11:41:58
| | [ #71 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 20-Nov-2007 Posts: 203
From: Canada | | |
|
| @kolla
It should but there's no GUI - you'd have to edit the config yourself, best by copypasting it from linux (since this is a regular wpa_supplicant config file)
edit:typo Last edited by jacadcaps on 22-May-2015 at 11:42 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
phoenixkonsole
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 11:51:49
| | [ #72 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 8-Nov-2009 Posts: 1770
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 13:25:10
| | [ #73 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| ooops... accidentaly destroyed my own post... and it's only monday ....
Interesting week ahead for me it seems... Last edited by KimmoK on 25-May-2015 at 09:01 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 25-May-2015 at 08:59 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 02:26 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 02:26 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:40 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:39 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:39 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:35 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:33 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:33 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:33 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 22-May-2015 at 01:25 PM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 20:37:56
| | [ #74 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3650
From: Germany | | |
|
| @KimmoK
Quote:
KimmoK wrote: IIRC, AROS releases come on a DVD image rather than on a CD image. So, one should never ever try to get it running natively on pre-DVD era x86 HW (unless looking for trouble). (I have swapped from CD to DVD on some old P4 HW, just to see that it was futile) |
It's Icaros which is available as a DVD image, but there's also a light version as a CD image.
AROS, itself, requires much less space. Take a look at the native versions for x86 and x64, here. Quote:
@cdimauro
IIRC, AOS4.1 can now have RAM drive to use memory above 2GB via ext mem. Just needs modified/updated ram drive handler (or something). Surely similar could be done for MorphOS if the need is big enough. |
Please, keep such horrible bank switching hack out of a modern o.s..
It's possible to use memory >2GB, even >4GB, without requiring it. At least for system related stuff (included RAM:, RAD:, and possibly some memory for filesystem blocks caching). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 20:47:09
| | [ #75 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9593
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @cdimauro
Quote:
It's possible to use memory >2GB, even >4GB, without requiring it. |
Sounds good! I´m so tempted to see your solution...
Quote:
At least for system related stuff (included RAM:, RAD:, and possibly some memory for filesystem blocks caching). |
...well, you really think this above is more useful than bank switching? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 21:43:27
| | [ #76 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 3650
From: Germany | | |
|
| @pavlor
Quote:
pavlor wrote: @cdimauro
Quote:
It's possible to use memory >2GB, even >4GB, without requiring it. |
Sounds good! I´m so tempted to see your solution... |
I don't lose my time trying to improve an archaic system. 64 bit processors existed from a LOOOONG time: just use one of them instead of emulating an 8-bit processor. Quote:
Quote:
At least for system related stuff (included RAM:, RAD:, and possibly some memory for filesystem blocks caching). |
...well, you really think this above is more useful than bank switching? |
Yes. You don't need to introduce new APIs to force the software work like an 8-bit processor, because all the things that I cited can be internally and transparently handled by the o.s., freeing memory.
New APIs also means: - effort to the o.s. devs to write them; - effort to the applications devs to use them; - a legacy baggage that you will bring when/if you decide to go to the a real 64-bit platform.
AROS is already available a real 64-bit platform. MorphOS will take the same direction. Guess who is missing from the obvious "next step"... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 22:27:44
| | [ #77 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2159
From: Australia | | |
|
| @ASiegel
There are no "officially supported" machines, and Im talking machines with full support, not just machines that boot, or partially boot. There's about 2 dozen systems between ASUS eeepc and AspireOnes alone. Literally hundreds of systems with a p35/ich7/8/9/10 combo chipset (very well supported). Compaq Presario v6xxx is also well supported in its various models...... This is a few hundred options already, without even looking or scratching the surface. I must agree though that the information regarding hardware support is a bit all over the place. I might try to find time to help with tidying it up a bit myself actually. Given my experience with AROS and the volume of hardware I come across (my own and otherwise) I'm probably a reasonable choice for such an endeavour.
@Kimmok
Seems you've had bad luck then. Of the dozen machines I currently have, not one fails to work. All varying specs up unto my 3.7ghz i7+gf580gtx. My i5-760+gf 560ti also works great, as does my 4.1ghz core2duo+gf9600gt. Laptop wise the 2.4ghz athlon64/gf7300 Compaq Presario works nicely (although its a bit slow these days, but that's probably perspective more than anything). Having said this though, I do seem to have been unusually lucky with my AROS hardware experiences over the years, and purchases are based on having tested it on a lot of hardware, so it's not all dumb luck.
Last edited by fishy_fis on 23-May-2015 at 01:07 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 22-May-2015 22:44:21
| | [ #78 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9593
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @cdimauro
Quote:
because all the things that I cited can be internally and transparently handled by the o.s., freeing memory. |
Things like RAM and RAD disk? Surprising progress.
Quote:
AROS is already available a real 64-bit platform. |
Nobody is using it, guess why...
Quote:
MorphOS will take the same direction. |
In 2050, day after Hyperion introduces SMP. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
terminills
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 23-May-2015 0:37:52
| | [ #79 ] |
|
|
|
AROS Core Developer |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1472
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @pavlor
I use the 64 bit branch :P
_________________ Support AROS sponsor a developer.
"AROS is prolly illegal ~ Evert Carton" intentionally quoted out of context for dramatic effect |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kolla
| |
Re: Morphos X86 Posted on 23-May-2015 6:48:37
| | [ #80 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2896
From: Trondheim, Norway | | |
|
| @jacadcaps
Well, wpa_supplicant must also be compiled with the needed support and somehow linked to SSL libraries, since it is required to validate IdP certificate and create a TLS connection of some sort for passing on credentials (many methods supported) Last edited by kolla on 23-May-2015 at 06:49 AM.
_________________ B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|