Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
5665 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
Home
Features
News
Forums
Classifieds
Links
Downloads
Extras
OS4 Zone
IRC Network
AmigaWorld Radio
Newsfeed
Top Members
Amiga Dealers
Information
About Us
FAQs
Advertise
Polls
Terms of Service
Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

(Uses JAVA Applet and Port 1024)
Visit the Chatroom Website

Who's Online
 61 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 fishy_fis:  5 mins ago
 BigD:  11 mins ago
 ilbarbax:  28 mins ago
 K-L:  29 mins ago
 RobertB:  41 mins ago
 Allanon:  47 mins ago
 Musashi5150:  1 hr 6 mins ago
 WOSPUPOS4:  2 hrs 16 mins ago
 Tarzin:  2 hrs 43 mins ago
 Trekiej:  3 hrs 15 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga General Chat
      /  Benchmarks time 2018 Edition! ;-)
Register To Post

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next Page )
PosterThread
Tuxedo 
Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 16:21:05
#1 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2284
From: Perugia, ITALY

****************** RESULTS ****************

NOTE I put there topic result on top of the topic to made easyer to found and compare results. (to read the topic main body plz scroll down)


DNTEC (higher better)

*OGR-NG*

42,445,595 nodes/sec ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
35,555,096 nodes/sec ---> PowerBook5.6(MOS3.9 G4@1667MHz)
33,753,320 nodes/sec ---> PowerMac3.1(MOS3.9 G4@1600MHz/Radeon9800)
24,282,846 nodes/sec ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
23,157,919 nodes/sec ---> NON AltiVec ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
22,245,376 nodes/sec ---> AmigaOne X5000/40 (AO4.1FEBETA P5040@2.2GHz)
20,136,464 nodes/sec ---> AmigaOne X5000/20 (MOS beta P5020@2GHz)
16,853,928 nodes/sec ---> NON AltiVec ---> PowerBook5.6(MOS3.9 G4@1667MHz)
11,616,256 nodes/sec ---> NON AltiVec ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
8,892,416 nodes/sec ---> "Rapture"(AOS3.9 G4@450)
8,647,111 nodes/sec ---> Amithlon(AOS3.9 Intel Core2Duo@4.0 Ghz)
5,218,781 nodes/sec ---> Sam440ep(AOS4.x AMCC440@667MHz)
5,569,086 nodes/sec ---> WinUAE(AOS4.x Intel i5 3570k)
5,051,323 nodes/sec ---> "Rapture"(AOS3.9 G4@450)
4,785,134 nodes/sec ---> WinUAE(AOS3.x Intel E8500@3 Ghz)
2,629,582 nodes/sec ---> WinUAE(AOS4.1FEu1 Corei3-5005U@2.0GHz/IntelHD5500)

*RC5-72*

19,947,454 keys/sec ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
17,340,324 keys/sec ---> PowerBook5.6(MOS3.9 G4@1667MHz)
16,692,156 keys/sec ---> PowerMac3.1(MOS3.9 G4@1600MHz/Radeon9800)
12,010,461 keys/sec ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
6,492,355 keys/sec ---> NON AltiVec ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
6,395,272 keys/sec ---> NON AltiVec ---> PowerBook5.6(MOS3.9 G4@1667MHz)
6,182,771 keys/sec ---> AmigaOne X5000/40 (AO4.1FEBETA P5040@2.2GHz)
6,130,651 keys/sec ---> Amithlon(AOS3.9 Intel Core2Duo@4.0 Ghz)
5,590,276 keys/sec ---> AmigaOne X5000/20 (MOS beta P5020@2GHz)
5,457,530 keys/sec ---> WinUAE(AOS3.x Intel E8500@3 Ghz)
4,785,523 keys/sec ---> WinUAE(AOS4.x Intel i5 3570k)
4,438,031 keys/sec ---> NON AltiVec ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
4,112,400 keys/sec ---> "Rapture"(AOS3.9 G4@450)
2,193,253 keys/sec ---> WinUAE(AOS4.1FEu1 Corei3-5005U@2.0GHz/IntelHD5500)
1,689,142 keys/sec ---> Sam440ep(AOS4.x AMCC440@667MHz)

AFinch 68k (lower better)

2.040 ---> Amithlon(AOS3.9 Intel Core2Duo@4.0 Ghz)
3.360 ---> WinUAE(AOS3.x Intel E8500@3 Ghz)
6.240 ----> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
9.080 ---> PoweBook G4(MOS3.9 G4@1670/Radeon9700)
9.640 ---> PowerMac3.1(MOS3.9 G4@1600MHz/Radeon9800)
13.740 ---> Pegasos2(MOS3.9 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
13.780 ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)

AfinchWOS (lower better)

1.380 ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
3.820 ---> PoweBook G4(MOS3.9 G4@1670/Radeon9700)
4.660 ---> Pegasos2(MOS3.9 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
4.680 ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
5.600 ---> WinUAE(AOS4.x Intel i5 3570k)
8.000 ---> Sam440ep(AOS4.x AMCC440@667MHz)

AFlops68k (higher better) (Arithmetic Average on MFLOPS() values)

280.3623 ---> Amithlon(AOS3.9 Intel Core2Duo@4.0 Ghz)
191,6126 ---> WinUAE(AOS3.x Intel E8500@3 Ghz)
126.9868 --> MacDaulG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
82,3220 ---> PowerMac3.1(MOS3.9 G4@1600MHz/Radeon9800)
3.171 ---> Pegasos2(MOS3.9 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
0,9642 ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)

AFlopsWOS(higher better)(Arithmetic Average on MFLOPS() values)

957.9619 ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
402.4370 ---> PoweBook G4(MOS3.9 G4@1670/Radeon9700)
279.8695 ---> Pegasos2(MOS3.9 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
274.1507 ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
153.5365 ---> Sam440ep(AOS4.x AMCC440@667MHz)
26.9518 ---> WinUAE(AOS4.x Intel i5 3570k)

LAME (lower better)

0:09 / 35.823x ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
0:26 / 12.146x ---> PoweBook G4(MOS3.9 G4@1670/Radeon9700)
0:34 / 9.2925x ---> PowerMac3.1(MOS3.9 G4@1600MHz/Radeon9800)
0:41s / 7.7933x ---> Pegasos2(MOS3.9 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
0.42s / 7.6164x ---> Amithlon(AOS3.9 Intel Core2Duo@4.0 Ghz)
0:44 / 7.3445x ---> NON AltiVec ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
0:49s / 6.5045x ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
0š58 / 5.4185x ---> NON AltiVecPoweBook G4(MOS3.9 G4@1670/Radeon9700)
1:05 / 4.1899x ---> WinUAE(AOS3.x Intel E8500@3 Ghz)

mPlayer (lower better)

60.488s ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
73.144s ---> NON AltiVec ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
164.519s --> WinUAE(AOS4.1FEu1 Corei3-5005U@2.0GHz/IntelHD5500)

MUImPlayer (lower better)

11.713s ---> MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)
15.721s ---> AROS(Icaros2.2 Intel Core2 6400@2130MHz/nVidea Gallium)
20.485s ---> AROS(Icaros2.2 Intel Core2 T5600@1830MHz/Intel GMA)
21.195s ---> AmigaOneX1000(AOS4 PA6-T@1.8Ghz)
29.067s ---> PoweBook G4(MOS3.9 G4@1670/Radeon9700)
29.240s ---> PowerBook5.6(MOS3.9 G4@1667MHz)
29.989s ---> MacMiniG4(MOS3.9 G4@1500GHz)
39.546s ---> AROS(Icaros2.2 Intel Atom N450@1660MHz/Intel GMA)
47.737s ---> Pegasos2(MOS3.9 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
50.375s ---> PowerMac3.1(MOS3.9 G4@1600MHz/Radeon9800)
55.491s ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
68.308s ---> NON AltiVec ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
82.490s ---> WinUAE(AOS3.x Intel E8500@3 Ghz)
152.362s ---> NON AltiVec --->WinUAE(AOS4.1FEu1 Corei3-5005U@2.0GHz/IntelHD5500)

BoingCube benchmark (higher better)

---FullScreenHARDware

95.894 FPS ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
10.997 FPS ---> WinUAE(AOS4.1FEu1 Corei3-5005U@2.0GHz/IntelHD5500)

---FullScreenSOFTware

81.967 FPS ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)

---WindowedHARDware

99.140 FPS ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)

---WindowedSOFTware

83.932 FPS ---> Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)
11.189 FPS ---> WinUAE(AOS4.1FEu1 Corei3-5005U@2.0GHz/IntelHD5500)

GPMARK (higher better)

***MacDualG5(MOS3.9 G5@2.7GHz)***
Blitting test 610.6
Plasma 558.9
Rotozoomer 274.0
Rotozoomer near 274.8
Roptozoomer far 273.8
Radial blur 320.7
3d bunny 59.8

***PowerMac3.1(MOS3.9 G4@1600MHz/Radeon9800)***
Blitting test: 473.1
Plasma: 395.7
Rotorzoomer: 207.8
Rotorzoomer near: 207.5
Rotorzoomer far: 203.7
Radial blur: 121.0
3D bunny: 18.1

***AROS(Icaros2.2 Intel Core2 6400@2130MHz/nVidea Gallium)***
Blitting test 273.4
Plasma 269.5
Rotozoomer 261.7
Rotozoomer near 262.0
Roptozoomer far 261.3
Radial blur 166.4
3d bunny 85.1

***AROS(Icaros2.2 Intel Core2 T5600@1830MHz/Intel GMA)***
Blitting test 183.5
Plasma 178.7
Rotozoomer 174.8
Rotozoomer near 175.0
Roptozoomer far 174.7
Radial blur 129.1
3d bunny 70.4

***AROS(Icaros2.2 Intel Atom N450@1660MHz/Intel GMA)***
Blitting test 70.4
Plasma 66.8
Rotozoomer 65.6
Rotozoomer near 66.4
Roptozoomer far 63.5
Radial blur 46.4
3d bunny 24.0

***Pegasos2(AOS4.1FEu1 G4@1131/Radeon9000pro)***
Blitting test 103.9
Plasma 51.5
Rotozoomer 57.9
Rotozoomer near 59.7
Roptozoomer far 57.2
Radial blur 9.7
3d bunny 8.3

***WinUAE(AOS4.1FEu1 Corei3-5005U@2.0GHz/IntelHD5500)***
Blitting test 27.9
Plasma 19.6
Rotozoomer 19.6
Rotozoomer near 19.8
Rotozoomer far 19.5
Radial blur 7.5
3D bunny 4.5







**************** TOPIC BODY ****************


Hi Guys and Happy New Year!

Since the old Benchmarks time topic(http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30008&forum=2) becomes a bit messy and want to try to update benchs and various tests I'll start a new topic where try to do things in a better way...

Hope also to make things ordered to have a better comparison against various systems...

I dont found all the tests for all the systems however that can be a good comparison for all Amiga-˛like systems(included WinUAE, WinUAE_PPC and also Vampire)

Lets start...

For guys interested, download:

http://http.distributed.net/pub/dcti/current-client/dnetc-amigaos-ppc.lha ---> dntec AmigaOS4

http://http.distributed.net/pub/dcti/current-client/dnetc-morphos-ppc.lha ---> dntec MorphOS

http://http.distributed.net/pub/dcti/current-client/dnetc-amigaos-68k.lha ---> dntec AmigaOS68k

http://http.distributed.net/pub/dcti/current-client/dnetc-amigaos-ppc-wos.lha ---> dntec WarpOS

http://aminet.net/util/moni/afinch.lha ---> integer CPU benchmark interesting to test in all systems

http://aminet.net/util/moni/aflops.lha ---> float CPU benchmark interesting to test in all systems

http://os4depot.net/share/audio/record/lame.lha ---> lame OS4 version(NOTE: in the archive there was a version for non altivec cpu based on newev 3.100 and an AltiVec version based on 3.98.2, dunno if there was speed differences)

http://morphos-files.net/download/LAME ---> lame MOS version as above version number not same, dunno if there was speed differences

http://aminet.net/mus/misc/lameAros-3.100.lha ---> lame 3.100 AROS

http://aminet.net/mus/misc/lameA68K-3.100.lha ---> lame 3.100 68k

http://os4depot.net/share/video/play/mplayer-mickjt.lha ---> mplayer from MickJT AmigaOS4

http://os4depot.net/share/video/play/muimplayer.lha ---> mui mplayer port from kas1e

http://morphos-files.net/remote/MPlayer ---> mplayer MorphOS

http://archives.aros-exec.org/share/video/play/mplayer-1.0-v4.i386-aros.zip ---> mplayer AROS

http://aminet.net/demo/misc/BoingCube.lha ---> OS4(and maybe MOS with os4emu?) test for gfx and cpu

http://os4depot.net/share/utility/benchmark/gpmark.lha ---> OS4 GPmark test

http://aminet.net/gfx/3d/GPmark.lha ---> MOS GPmark test

http://archives.aros-exec.org/share/utility/benchmark/gpmark-i386-aros.zip ---> AROS GPMark test


MEDIA TO DOWNLOAD

Audio file from:

http://www.boorp.com/musica_libera_mp3_royalty_free_senza_copyright/mp3_don't_break_my_hearth_royalty_free_musica_libera_senza_diritti_autore.php

Video file from:

http://trailers.divx.com/divx_prod/profiles/Fashion_DivX720p_ASP.divx



NOTES

- for dntec(all program cores) test do:

dntec -bench

- for the lame test starting from the mp3 file use the above command to obtain the wav file to encode:

lame --decode don't_break_my_hearth.wav to don't_break_my_hearth.mp3

than use:

lame don't_break_my_hearth.wav

to perform the test

- for mplayer test use:

mplayerYOURCPUVERSION -nosound -vo null -benchmark Fashion_DivX720p_ASP.divx

to perform the test

- to rum Afinch and AFlops 68k on OS4 plz download ixemul from os4depot:

http://os4depot.net/share/development/library/ixemul_bin.tar.bz2

and skip the etc: volume request


My results scored on my Pegasos2 G4@1131 1GB RAM and Radeon9000pro on AmigaOS4.1FE Upd1

*** dntec ***

dnetc v2.9112-521-CTR-16020313 for AmigaOS (OS 4.1, PowerPC).
Please provide the *entire* version descriptor when submitting bug reports.
The distributed.net bug report pages are at http://bugs.distributed.net/

[Jan 06 16:44:05 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
a PowerPC 7445/7455 (G4) processor.
[Jan 06 16:44:05 UTC] OGR-NG: using core #0 (KOGE 3.1 Scalar).
[Jan 06 16:44:26 UTC] OGR-NG: Benchmark for core #0 (KOGE 3.1 Scalar)
0.00:00:17.11 [11,616,256 nodes/sec]
[Jan 06 16:44:26 UTC] OGR-NG: using core #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid).
[Jan 06 16:44:46 UTC] OGR-NG: Benchmark for core #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid)
0.00:00:17.29 [24,282,846 nodes/sec]
[Jan 06 16:44:46 UTC] OGR-NG benchmark summary :
Default core : #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid) 24,282,846 nodes/sec
Fastest core : #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid) 24,282,846 nodes/sec
[Jan 06 16:44:46 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (MH 2-pipe).
[Jan 06 16:45:04 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (MH 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.08 [4,372,341 keys/sec]
[Jan 06 16:45:04 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (KKS 2-pipe).
[Jan 06 16:45:23 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (KKS 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.18 [4,341,963 keys/sec]
[Jan 06 16:45:23 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (KKS 604e).
[Jan 06 16:45:42 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (KKS 604e)
0.00:00:16.08 [4,438,031 keys/sec]
[Jan 06 16:45:42 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (KKS 7400).
[Jan 06 16:46:01 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (KKS 7400)
0.00:00:17.07 [10,290,169 keys/sec]
[Jan 06 16:46:01 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (KKS 7450).
[Jan 06 16:46:20 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (KKS 7450)
0.00:00:16.45 [12,010,461 keys/sec]
[Jan 06 16:46:20 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (MH 1-pipe).
[Jan 06 16:46:38 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (MH 1-pipe)
0.00:00:16.41 [4,013,160 keys/sec]
[Jan 06 16:46:38 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (MH 1-pipe 604e).
[Jan 06 16:46:57 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (MH 1-pipe 604e)
0.00:00:16.54 [3,983,269 keys/sec]
[Jan 06 16:46:57 UTC] RC5-72 benchmark summary :
Default core : #4 (KKS 7450) 12,010,461 keys/sec
Fastest core : #4 (KKS 7450) 12,010,461 keys/sec
[Jan 06 16:46:57 UTC] Compare and share your rates in the speeds database at
http://www.distributed.net/speed/
(benchmark rates are for a single processor core)

*** AFinch 68k ***

Amiga Fibonacci Benchmark V1.0 By Chris De Maeyer
(C)1999 Visionary Software - Released as Freeware

Calculating, please wait...
Run Time Seconds = 13.780

*** AFinch WOS ***

Amiga Fibonacci Benchmark V1.0 By Chris De Maeyer
(C)1999 Visionary Software - Released as Freeware

Calculating, please wait...
Run Time Seconds = 4.680
Processo: Shell 3

*** AFlops 68k ***

Amiga Flops Benchmark (Double Precision), V2.0

Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
1 2.0836e-09 =.6700 1.0241
2 -3.5527e-10 7.0100 0.9986
3 -2.6995e-11 16.8200 1.0107
4 -7.7337e-11 15.6800 0.9566
5 -3.4114e-11 29.4000 0.9864
6 -1.4921e-11 29.4200 0.9857
7 1.7627e-07 12.7700 0.9397
8 -1.9886e-11 30.4400 0.9855

Iterations = 2000000
NullTime (usec) = 0.0200
MFLOPS(1) = 1.0025
MFLOPS(2) = 0.9739
MFLOPS(3) = 0.9852
MFLOPS(4) = 0.9853

*** AFlops WOS ***

Amiga Flops Benchmark (Double Precision), V2.0

Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
1 4.0146e-13 0.0531 263.5294
2 -1.4166e-13 0.0352 199.1111
3 4.7184e-14 0.0397 428.3465
4 -1.2546e-13 0.0586 256.1708
5 -1.3800e-13 0.0946 306.6501
6 3.2374e-13 0.0631 459.4059
7 -8.4583e-11 0.1396 85.9301
8 3.4855e-13 0.0677 443.4180

Iterations = 512000000
NullTime (usec) = 0.0018
MFLOPS(1) = 241.3343
MFLOPS(2) = 175.1846
MFLOPS(3) = 282.7445
MFLOPS(4) = 397.3392

*** LAME ***

LAME 3.98.2 32bits (http://www.mp3dev.org/)
Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 16537 Hz - 17071 Hz
Encoding don't_break_my_hearth.wav to don't_break_my_hearth.wav.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (11x) 128 kbps qval=3
Frame | CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU | ETA
12206/12206 (100%)| 0:49/ 0:49| 0:49/ 0:49| 6.5045x| 0:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kbps LR MS % long switch short %
128.0 3.3 96.7 96.6 2.2 1.2
Writing LAME Tag...done
ReplayGain: +3.5dB

*** mplayer ***

BENCHMARKs: VC: 55.721s VO: 0.034s A: 0.000s Sys: 4.733s = 60.488s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 92.1195% VO: 0.0561% A: 0.0000% Sys: 7.8244% = 100.0000%

*** mplayer NON AltiVec **

BENCHMARKs: VC: 68.264s VO: 0.030s A: 0.000s Sys: 4.850s = 73.144s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 93.3280% VO: 0.0413% A: 0.0000% Sys: 6.6307% = 100.0000%


*** mui mplayer ***

BENCHMARKs: VC: 51.238s VO: 0.025s A: 0.000s Sys: 4.229s = 55.491s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 92.3342% VO: 0.0451% A: 0.0000% Sys: 7.6207% = 100.0000%

*** mui mplayer NON ALtiVec ***

BENCHMARKs: VC: 64.116s VO: 0.017s A: 0.000s Sys: 4.174s = 68.308s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 93.8638% VO: 0.0252% A: 0.0000% Sys: 6.1110% = 100.0000%


*** BoingCube benchmark ***

Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.45 - 6.1 - 6.1 (20160425)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced HARDware
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 960 frames
Duration: 10011 ms (10.011 seconds)
Rendering time: 109 ms (0.109 seconds) [lower is better]
R. frame-rate: 8807.339 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]
Result: 95.894 FPS (displayed frames/second) [higher is better]

*** BoingCube benchmark ***

Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.45 - 6.1 - 6.1 (20160425)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced SOFTware
Hardware acc.: Buff: OFF (software) Gfx: OFF (software)
Iterations: 820 frames
Duration: 10004 ms (10.004 seconds)
Rendering time: 584 ms (0.584 seconds) [lower is better]
R. frame-rate: 1404.109 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]
Result: 81.967 FPS (displayed frames/second) [higher is better]

*** BoingCube benchmark ***

Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.45 - 6.1 - 6.1 (20160425)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced HARDware
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 992 frames
Duration: 10006 ms (10.006 seconds)
Rendering time: 75 ms (0.075 seconds) [lower is better]
R. frame-rate: 13226.666 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]
Result: 99.140 FPS (displayed frames/second) [higher is better]

*** BoingCube benchmark ***

Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.45 - 6.1 - 6.1 (20160425)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced SOFTware
Hardware acc.: Buff: OFF (software) Gfx: OFF (software)
Iterations: 840 frames
Duration: 10008 ms (10.008 seconds)
Rendering time: 562 ms (0.562 seconds) [lower is better]
R. frame-rate: 1494.661 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]
Result: 83.932 FPS (displayed frames/second) [higher is better]

*** GPMARK ***

Blitting test 103.9
Plasma 51.5
Rotozoomer 57.9
Rotozoomer near 59.7
Roptozoomer far 57.2
Radial blur 9.7
3d bunny 8.3



+++++ Results om MorphOS 3.9 on my Pegasos2 G4@1131 1GB RAM & Radeon 9000pro +++++


*** AFinch68k GENERIC ***

Amiga Fibonacci Benchmark V1.0 By Chris De Maeyer
(C)1999 Visionary Software - Released as Freeware

Calculating, please wait...
Run Time Seconds = 13.740

*** AFinchWOS ***

Amiga Fibonacci Benchmark V1.0 By Chris De Maeyer
(C)1999 Visionary Software - Released as Freeware

Calculating, please wait...
Run Time Seconds = 4.660

*** AFlops 68k GENERIC ***

Amiga Flops Benchmark (Double Precision), V2.0

Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
1 4.4764e-13 4.4400 3.1532
2 -8.3933e-14 2.2350 3.1320
3 1.2879e-14 5.2750 3.2227
4 4.4187e-14 4.9600 3.0242
5 -3.9857e-14 9.3550 3.0999
6 1.2323e-14 9.3500 3.1016
7 7.9751e-11 4.1000 2.9268
8 -1.7431e-14 9.6300 3.1153

Iterations = 4000000
NullTime (usec) = 0.0100
MFLOPS(1) = 3.1611
MFLOPS(2) = 3.0534
MFLOPS(3) = 3.0991
MFLOPS(4) = 3.1148

*** AFlopsWOS ***

Amiga Flops Benchmark (Double Precision), V2.0

Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
1 4.0146e-13 0.0519 269.8795
2 -1.4166e-13 0.0348 201.1223
3 4.7184e-14 0.0384 442.7263
4 -1.2546e-13 0.0571 262.4744
5 -1.3800e-13 0.0929 312.0639
6 3.2374e-13 0.0616 470.4689
7 -8.4583e-11 0.1375 87.2479
8 3.4855e-13 0.0661 453.9007

Iterations = 512000000
NullTime (usec) = 0.0027
MFLOPS(1) = 244.7959
MFLOPS(2) = 178.3727
MFLOPS(3) = 288.7515
MFLOPS(4) = 407.5577


*** lame ***

LAME 3.99.5 32bits (http://lame.sf.net)
Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 16538 Hz - 17071 Hz
Encoding //don't_break_my_hearth.wav to //don't_break_my_hearth.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (11x) 128 kbps qval=3
Frame | CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU | ETA
12205/12205 (100%)| 0:40/ 0:40| 0:41/ 0:41| 7.7933x| 0:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kbps LR MS % long switch short %
128.0 4.1 95.9 96.5 2.2 1.3
Writing LAME Tag...done
ReplayGain: +3.5dB

*** mui mplayer ***

BENCHMARKs: VC: 45.166s VO: 0.016s A: 0.000s Sys: 2.555s = 47.737s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 94.6141% VO: 0.0345% A: 0.0000% Sys: 5.3514% = 100.0000%

Last edited by Tuxedo on 22-Jan-2018 at 08:34 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 09-Jan-2018 at 10:02 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 07-Jan-2018 at 10:55 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 07-Jan-2018 at 10:50 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 06-Jan-2018 at 09:29 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 06-Jan-2018 at 08:40 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 06-Jan-2018 at 08:38 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 06-Jan-2018 at 05:24 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 06-Jan-2018 at 03:29 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 06-Jan-2018 at 03:26 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 01-Jan-2018 at 06:38 PM.
Last edited by Tuxedo on 01-Jan-2018 at 06:33 PM.

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 16:48:37
#2 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 8599
From: Unknown

@Tuxedo

New audio and video files? Why not use the same like in previous benchmarks for better comparison?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tuxedo 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 16:59:29
#3 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2284
From: Perugia, ITALY

@pavlor

to start from zero for every system...

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
BigD 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 17:20:04
#4 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Aug-2005
Posts: 4259
From: UK

@Tuxedo

Why don't you encourage creative uses of Amiga hardware rather than pointless benchmarking? A ridiculous endeavour as ALL Amigas are relatively slow hardware wise

_________________
"Art challenges technology. Technology inspires the art."
John Lasseter, Pixar Animation Studios

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 17:38:36
#5 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 8599
From: Unknown

@BigD

Benchmarks are useful, period. However, I wouldn┤t select some of the above benchmarks for my own comparison.


@Tuxedo

Fresh start then.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
BigD 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 17:47:02
#6 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Aug-2005
Posts: 4259
From: UK

@pavlor

A simple X5000>X1000>Tabor>Sam 460>Sam 440EX

With Pegasos G4 and older AmigaONE machine slotted into there correct positions would be fine for me.

When the machines are mostly thrashed by 2006 era G5s anyway in pure CPU grunt then it really does bare the question:

Who cares?

More importantly:
Can you play video in 1080p?
Can you bank using the machine with a secure browser?
Can you animate Anim5 files?
Can you run an Office Suite using this machine?
etc

_________________
"Art challenges technology. Technology inspires the art."
John Lasseter, Pixar Animation Studios

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
klx300r 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 17:55:40
#7 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 4-Mar-2008
Posts: 3273
From: Toronto, Canada

@ Tuxedo

great idea, love benchmarks! also posted this over at amigans

btw, for lame test it should be (to convert mps to wav):

lame --decode don't_break_my_hearth.mp3

@BigD

why don't you just ignore this thread and let others who actually want to participate have some fun

_________________
____________________________
c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII
! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 !
mancave-ramblings
X1000 I BELIEVE

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
BigD 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:05:18
#8 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Aug-2005
Posts: 4259
From: UK

@klx300r

Fine, you all do the equivalent of reving up your little mopeds if it makes you happy but it bears no resemblance to the Amiga I know. Usability and fun is the order of the day not banging the metal to generate statistics!!!!

_________________
"Art challenges technology. Technology inspires the art."
John Lasseter, Pixar Animation Studios

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tuxedo 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:07:28
#9 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2284
From: Perugia, ITALY

@BigD

Because we have that...no other unfortunately...

And that way we can see how current Amiga hw perform related to "old"...

If you dont like them as described on topic is for interested users...

@klx300r

whoops...typo...

However BIG PROBLEM!
Cant edit topic...while pressing "edit" button I get a blank edit window...

Any idea why?

Last edited by Tuxedo on 01-Jan-2018 at 06:08 PM.

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tuxedo 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:10:09
#10 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2284
From: Perugia, ITALY

@BigD

sorry...but you have an AmigaOS/MOS capable hw and you use it currently?

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:12:50
#11 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 8599
From: Unknown

@Tuxedo

Host: Core i3-5005U 2.0 GHz, 4 GB RAM, Intel HD5500 (my low cost notebook)
Guest: WinUAE 3.3.0 Beta 18/604e, 640 MB RAM, Picasso IV, AmigaOS 4.1 FEu1


MUIMplayer:
BENCHMARKs: VC: 149.835s VO: 0.034s A: 0.000s Sys: 2.493s = 152.362s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 98.3418% VO: 0.0221% A: 0.0000% Sys: 1.6361% = 100.0000%

dnetc:
dnetc v2.9109-518-CTR-10121712 for AmigaOS (OS 4.1, PowerPC).
Please provide the *entire* version descriptor when submitting bug reports.
The distributed.net bug report pages are at http://bugs.distributed.net/

[Jan 01 17:44:09 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
a PowerPC 604e processor.
[Jan 01 17:44:09 UTC] OGR-NG: using core #0 (KOGE 3.1 Scalar).
[Jan 01 17:44:29 UTC] OGR-NG: Benchmark for core #0 (KOGE 3.1 Scalar)
0.00:00:16.89 [2,629,582 nodes/sec]
[Jan 01 17:44:29 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (MH 1-pipe 604e).
[Jan 01 17:44:48 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (MH 1-pipe 604e)
0.00:00:16.41 [2,193,253 keys/sec]


Commentary: dnetc shows raw integer performance (cca G3 266 MHz), mplayer integer+memory performance (cca your G4 412 MHz), both benefit from AltiVec (which I don┤t have ).

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tuxedo 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:15:32
#12 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2284
From: Perugia, ITALY

@pavlor

hum...where to donwload dntec?

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:20:43
#13 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 8599
From: Unknown

@Tuxedo

There are many dnetc G4 results for comparison, but if you want, you may get it here (I see I use older version):

http://www.distributed.net/Download_clients#amiga

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tuxedo 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:34:33
#14 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2284
From: Perugia, ITALY

@pavlor

yes I found and updated the topic(fortunately I saved a txt with topic text)

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 18:40:06
#15 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2463
From: Amiga land

@pavlor

my amd athlon II x2 215 gave me really near your resullt on fs-uae on ubuntu .

soon i will have a threadripper im courious how will be the dnetc there in any way your is really small result compared my macbook pro i7 2102 too.

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Beans 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 19:09:39
#16 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 26-Aug-2016
Posts: 447
From: Bear Delaware USA

@tlosm

Quote:
my amd athlon II x2 215 gave me really near your resullt on fs-uae on ubuntu.


I have a Phenom II B59 @ 3.4 GHz with all four cores unlocked that does better.
And this is old technology.

Threadripper is a little too expensive for me, but Ryzen II should be within reach when I feel like upgrading.

_________________
Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
recedent 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 1-Jan-2018 19:37:13
#17 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 28-Jan-2010
Posts: 206
From: Unknown

@Tuxedo

MorphOS 3.9 on PowerMac G5 Dual 2,7 GHz:

dnetc (full benchmark - for all cores, not only the fastest ones):

[Jan 01 19:29:58 UTC] OGR-NG: Benchmark for core #0 (KOGE 3.1 Scalar)
0.00:00:16.98 [23,157,919 nodes/sec]
[Jan 01 19:29:58 UTC] OGR-NG: using core #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid).
[Jan 01 19:30:18 UTC] OGR-NG: Benchmark for core #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid)
0.00:00:16.71 [42,445,595 nodes/sec]
[Jan 01 19:30:19 UTC] OGR-NG benchmark summary :
Default core : #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid)
Fastest core : #1 (KOGE 3.1 Hybrid)
[Jan 01 19:30:19 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (MH 2-pipe).
[Jan 01 19:30:37 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (MH 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.07 [5,971,716 keys/sec]
[Jan 01 19:30:37 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (KKS 2-pipe).
[Jan 01 19:30:55 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (KKS 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.22 [6,492,355 keys/sec]
[Jan 01 19:30:55 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (KKS 604e).
[Jan 01 19:31:14 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (KKS 604e)
0.00:00:16.19 [5,916,867 keys/sec]
[Jan 01 19:31:14 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (KKS 7400).
[Jan 01 19:31:33 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (KKS 7400)
0.00:00:16.11 [16,733,223 keys/sec]
[Jan 01 19:31:33 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (KKS 7450).
[Jan 01 19:31:52 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (KKS 7450)
0.00:00:16.50 [19,947,454 keys/sec]
[Jan 01 19:31:52 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (MH 1-pipe).
[Jan 01 19:32:11 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (MH 1-pipe)
0.00:00:16.10 [5,039,712 keys/sec]
[Jan 01 19:32:11 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (MH 1-pipe 604e).
[Jan 01 19:32:29 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (MH 1-pipe 604e)
0.00:00:16.16 [5,011,873 keys/sec]
[Jan 01 19:32:29 UTC] RC5-72 benchmark summary :
Default core : #4 (KKS 7450)
Fastest core : #4 (KKS 7450)


more to follow.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Zylesea 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 2-Jan-2018 0:10:35
#18 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 16-Mar-2004
Posts: 2063
From: Ostwestfalen, FRG

@Tuxedo

Mac mini G4 1500 MorphOS 3.9

mplayer (console)

BENCHMARKs: VC: 29.114s VO: 0.018s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.857s = 29.989s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 97.0817% VO: 0.0596% A: 0.0000% Sys: 2.8586% = 100.0000%

_________________
My programs: www.via-altera.de
MorphOS user since V0.4 (2001)

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tuxedo 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 2-Jan-2018 20:39:28
#19 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2284
From: Perugia, ITALY

@recedent

mmm....I really not expert on dnetec bench...
Why different results on different cores?

MOS uses all cores separately?

HHowever taking fastest scores seems that in single core was about 2 times fast as my G4.

@Zylesea

really GOOD!
I think due to FAST RAM of MacMini compared to Pegasos2/A1 RAM...and also higher clock speed naturlly.

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Benchmarks time 2018 Edition!
Posted on 2-Jan-2018 20:42:38
#20 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 8599
From: Unknown

@Tuxedo

Quote:
MOS uses all cores separately?


No, single core only - different dnetc cores = different benchmarks (eg. koge is scalar and not using AltiVec - so comparable with G3 CPUs).

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next Page )

[ home ][ about us ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright ę 2000 - 2017 Amigaworld.net.

Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle