Poster | Thread |
A1200
| |
Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:15:06
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 5-May-2003 Posts: 3092
From: Westhall, UK | | |
|
| What Amiga(like) OS is best. Whoever wins is the ultimate winner ever, so tell your fellow fanbois to vote or you will lose! _________________ Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:25:51
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9591
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @A1200
I will not vote in such thread.
What I use most (not calling it best):
1. OS4.1 2. OS3.x 3. AROS x86 4. AROS 68k |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
A1200
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:27:55
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 5-May-2003 Posts: 3092
From: Westhall, UK | | |
|
| @pavlor
People died so you can have the vote, now vote! You know you want to. _________________ Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
hotrod
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:29:39
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 11-Mar-2003 Posts: 2993
From: Stockholm, Sweden | | |
|
| @A1200
I can't vote either but to me I like AOS 3.x for classic Amigas. They kind of belong together for nostalic reasons, history and they where made for them. You can tell.
AOS 4 for NG Amigas because it feals just like AOS 3.x and works the same but with lots and lots of improvements.
MOS feals like something different and is not for me.
AROS also feals like something different and is not for me. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:36:41
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9591
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @A1200
Quote:
People died so you can have the vote |
Well, in our country one-party rule was ousted without bloodshed. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
A1200
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:39:49
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 5-May-2003 Posts: 3092
From: Westhall, UK | | |
|
| @pavlor
OK then, people just happened to die whilst waiting for the vote. Better? _________________ Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
A1200
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:41:22
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 5-May-2003 Posts: 3092
From: Westhall, UK | | |
|
| Anyone here got a morphzone, or Aros Exec account? Post this poll on there. Those guys are getting murdered! _________________ Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Trewq
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 17:56:32
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 1-Jun-2012 Posts: 205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
A1200
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 18:19:01
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 5-May-2003 Posts: 3092
From: Westhall, UK | | |
|
| @Trewq
Nice tune! _________________ Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Signal
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 20:43:05
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 1-Jun-2013 Posts: 664
From: USA | | |
|
| @A1200
I can't vote either because I'm not a member. I used to be a member, but then I got dismembered. _________________ Tinkering with computers. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
BigD
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 21:00:34
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 11-Aug-2005 Posts: 7323
From: UK | | |
|
| @Thread
What a pointless thread. We've got more than one flavour of Amiga-like OS whether we like it or not so let's learn to live together without antagonising the other parties. It's doubtful many people have actually used all the different OSes in order to gauge which one is BEST!
This is a waste of time and will only start a flame war!!
_________________ "Art challenges technology. Technology inspires the art." John Lasseter, Co-Founder of Pixar Animation Studios |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Trewq
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 21:10:18
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 1-Jun-2012 Posts: 205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @BigD
Amen _________________ Best way to enjoy Amiga is without the community |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 21:16:16
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9591
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @BigD
Quote:
This is a waste of time and will only start a flame war!! |
Isn´t it intention of author of this thread? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
A1200
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 22:06:49
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 5-May-2003 Posts: 3092
From: Westhall, UK | | |
|
| @pavlor
Definitely. The war to end all wars. _________________ Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
NutsAboutAmiga
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 24-Apr-2015 22:18:31
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 9-Jun-2004 Posts: 12819
From: Norway | | |
|
| @A1200
I voted AmigaOS4, as this is what I have been using. (I have never used MorphOS), I have used AROS a long long time ago, but rally there is good and bad for etch.
All I can really say for sure is that AmigaOS4.x is better than AmigaOS3.x, as 3.x is an older version, that lacks many of newer features, and improvements.
If you're going to run old games then AmigaOS3.x is the only OS you should use, in the same way you need MacOS7 or MacOS8 to run old games. or some time Windows95 or MSDDOS aka DOSBox.
Anyway I like MacOS9 better then I like MacOSX, while MacOSX is the better one, this can be subjective.
_________________ http://lifeofliveforit.blogspot.no/ Facebook::LiveForIt Software for AmigaOS |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Drummerboy
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 25-Apr-2015 5:48:22
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 3-Jul-2003 Posts: 377
From: Santa Fe, Argentina - San Jose Costa Rica | | |
|
| The OS 3.. the last one original. _________________ Amiga 1000, 500, 600, 2000, 1200, 4000...
C= VIC 20 / 64 / SX64/ 128
Atari 600XL (SIC Cartdridge) Atari 800XL (SIO2SD Unit)
Jay Miner`s Atari 2600 - Wood front -
"Amiga, this Computer have a Own Live" |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hillbillylitre
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 25-Apr-2015 6:02:22
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 4-Apr-2015 Posts: 270
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Only AmigaOS up to 3.9, and only for the games and demos... Everything else is crap and waste of precious time. _________________ Using: One Commodore C64 - One Commodore Amiga 500 - One Commodore Amiga 1200 with BVision and Blizzard 68060 with PPC coprocessor running Amiga DOS - One Hellbillylitre Amigatwox86x64x6000x running Windows7 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
newlight
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 25-Apr-2015 17:47:32
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 10-Sep-2007 Posts: 1935
From: Somewhere in Spain | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
newlight
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 25-Apr-2015 17:54:15
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 10-Sep-2007 Posts: 1935
From: Somewhere in Spain | | |
|
| @Hillbillylitre
No my friend in Amiga nothing's crap is only a matter of taste to play games,view demos or enjoy Deluxe Paint,Cinema4D or Scala programs.
All is usable my miggy friend just... ENJOY!!!! _________________ AMIGA 500 1.5 MB ACA500/ACA1232 accelerators AMIGA 500 German CD32 unexpanded Amiga 1200 Tower on AmigaKit since years AMIGA 1300 030/50 Mhz/32 MB WB 3.9 with lots of games&demos AMIGA ONE XE G3 PPC 800 Mhz/1 GB RAM/RADEON 9250 128 MB/SATA CONTROLLER |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Templario
| |
Re: Which is best? Posted on 25-Apr-2015 19:25:11
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2004 Posts: 3663
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @A1200
MorphOS and OS3.9 with PNG icons. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|