@Hammer

Quote:

Hammer wrote: @BigD Quote: BigD wrote: @Hammer Why is this of interest? This is just geek porn surely?! Why don't people just choose a console that has the games they want to play, features they need (HD graphics/SD graphics, DVD/Blu-Ray) and budget to fit? All this tech bumf doesn't make any difference! Killzone will never be on the XBox and downloadable content for Grand Theft Auto IV will never be available for the PS3. The Wii is for the fad chasers and casual/party gamers, but some people want a fun casual experience for the family/party situation!! I'd prefer to play on the Sony Eyetoy really unless a good Light Saber game is ever made (not holding my breath as Lucasarts are now workshy morons)! The GPU issues on the PS3 don't change it's elegance or professional sheen, it's lack of back compatibility does! The lack of Blu-Ray/Cell Processor does not relegate the XBox 360 to a lesser console, it's criminal failure rate does! Get things in perspective. The figures are not as important as you think!!!! The Wii is woefully underpowered and last gen technology, but gimmicks sell- GO FIGURE!!! The trigger for my comments was MikeB's "Well the PS3 has already demonstrated the console go well beyond what the 360 can do technically." If MikeB wants to talk technical then he should be open for the responses.

You don't realize by now, MIkeB seems to only pick and choose what to respond to, and when he has no response, he simply ignores it?

_________________
Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??!