Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6209 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
22 crawler(s) on-line.
 95 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 Karlos:  13 mins ago
 davidf215:  1 hr 18 mins ago
 matthey:  1 hr 19 mins ago
 pixie:  1 hr 41 mins ago
 Mobileconnect:  2 hrs 34 mins ago
 DiscreetFX:  3 hrs 2 mins ago
 cpaek72:  3 hrs 5 mins ago
 zipper:  3 hrs 10 mins ago
 minator:  3 hrs 23 mins ago
 amiwell:  3 hrs 25 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  General Technology (No Console Threads)
      /  x86 CPU Progress
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )
PosterThread
BrianK 
Re: x86 CPU Progress
Posted on 29-Dec-2003 19:26:42
#41 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-Sep-2003
Posts: 8111
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA

@vortexau

While, you are correct about each additional release of Windows requires more and more hardware. Longhorn's offical release date isn't out, let alone the specs. There are specs for the pre-alpha version. 30GB, I believe, is the minimum size drive not the requirement for the OS itself. Also, the current version of Longhorn, according to Microsoft, hasn't been gone through to reduce resources or speed up use.

Microsoft isn't my favorite company but I think it's hard to start stating what the requirements are for a software package that's estimated to ship end of 2005 if not 2006. Also, if prices for hardware continue their downward spiral the hardware requirements will be equal to or less then the cost of a new computer in 2003.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Seer 
Re: x86 CPU Progress
Posted on 29-Dec-2003 19:54:57
#42 ]
Team Member
Joined: 27-Jun-2003
Posts: 3725
From: The Netherlands

Having acces to Longhorn (Got 1 friend who get's all alpha/beta/RC's from M$, costs him a lot of money, and 1 coworker gets them as well, real nice to have those DVDs) it runs fine on a P4 2Ghz and 512MB ram.. Offcourse the new filesystem is a long way from completion and the "new" TCP/IP6 isn't working, so anything can happen..

As for now, the latest build is just as resource hungry as Win XP.. Sure its' not Amiga OS, but it's not Win98 either..

_________________
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you..
~

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
vortexau 
Re: x86 CPU Progress
Posted on 30-Dec-2003 17:15:46
#43 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Mar-2003
Posts: 2651
From: . . outside the Pod-bay; Australia

@BrianK & Seer:

Of course those RAM and drive size requirments I posted weren't factual! I was just driving home why I sometimes call the product FLAT TYRES 98, FLAT TYRES 2000, FLAT TYRES XP (etc) in saying what an ever more-powerful Personal Carriage is running on!

Didn't you see the "Longhorn -- running like cold treacle in Antarticia" . . . and Intel- "We ramp it up so MS can slow it down"! lines?

This was in relation to why PC Users never fully gain from the speed-increase in x86 CPUs!

_________________
-vortexau, who's A1 XE-G4 remains at half-RAM !
A2000HD (from 1991) 060 64Mb PicassoII with OS3.5 . . . still working.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
fricopal! 
Re: x86 CPU Progress
Posted on 20-Mar-2025 2:40:19
#44 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 12-Mar-2025
Posts: 799
From: Unknown

Quote:
by rayt on 11-Dec-2003 19:40:16

I wonder how much power will be consumed/wasted by the 4Ghz P4...


Estimating a typical desktop PC with an AMD Athlon XP X3 processor running at full load for about 8 hours would consume roughly 100-250 watts. Higher power consumption applies to systems that run intensive applications or multiple tasks simultaneously, potentially reaching up to the system's maximum TDP (Thermal Design Power).

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle