Poster | Thread |
adiaux
|  |
Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 14:39:57
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 1-Jun-2006 Posts: 1249
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
COBRA
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 14:50:57
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Apr-2004 Posts: 1809
From: Auckland, New Zealand | | |
|
| @takemehomegrandma
Looks interesting, but any info on the pricing? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
billt
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 15:05:16
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 24-Oct-2003 Posts: 3205
From: Maryland, USA | | |
|
| @takemehomegrandma
It's a neat idea. For us as people wanting to play videogames and things like that, the LCD controller is probably a bit weak for the performance we;d like as desktop and gamer users. We're of course not the kind of people this chip was made for though. It's a cool idea, and I hope to see more of that sort of thing. But after PA Semi was learned about, I'm more interested in 64bit, and I believe PA Semi's power consumption is lower than the e600 core to core. I was pretty disappointed when the 8641 core power ratings were announced, was noticably higher than originally estimated. My dream is an Amiga laptop, and if we are stuck with PowerPC, then I think the PA Semi is the best choice for that for both battery life and performance. Power consumption is really my only complaint, unless they've maybe improved that since what I saw for the 8641's e600 implementation and I just haven't been paying attention anymore. _________________ All glory to the Hypnotoad! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Drako
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 15:09:19
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 6-Aug-2005 Posts: 223
From: Poland/Chelm | | |
|
| @takemehomegrandma
The 8610 Developer Program announced...
http://bbrv.blogspot.com/2008/01/what-has-changed.html _________________ Mac Mini G4 1.5 Ghz & MorphOS 3.x Power Mac G5 dual 2.3 Ghz MorphOS 3.x BlaBla Team Member -> http://blabla.ppa.pl AmiParty Team Member -> http://chal.pl |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Radov
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 15:17:09
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 22-Aug-2006 Posts: 139
From: Poland | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Crumb
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 15:22:17
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Mar-2003 Posts: 2209
From: Zaragoza (Aragonian State) | | |
|
| @takemehomegrandma
Looks very nice... as the perfect replacement for PegasosII.
BTW, what happened to 8641D?
Let's hope they are capable of producing it in enough numbers this time _________________ The only spanish amiga news web page/club: CUAZ |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
COBRA
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 15:38:10
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Apr-2004 Posts: 1809
From: Auckland, New Zealand | | |
|
| @billt
I think the 8610 is comparable to AMCC's 460EX, but is slightly more powerful (1.3GHz vs. 1.2GHz) with Altivec, which the 460EX does not have. Both have 32/32k L1 cache, 256MB L2 cache, DDR1/2 memory controller, 4-channel DMA and PCI-Express. The 460EX has built-in USB2.0, Gigabit Ethernet and SATA, while the 8610 has built-in LCD controller and AC97. The 460EX is considerably cheaper, with about $50 for larger quantities. Last edited by COBRA on 15-Jan-2008 at 04:33 PM. Last edited by COBRA on 15-Jan-2008 at 04:32 PM. Last edited by COBRA on 15-Jan-2008 at 03:39 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Crumb
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 16:21:57
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Mar-2003 Posts: 2209
From: Zaragoza (Aragonian State) | | |
|
| @COBRA
8641 has 1MB of L2 cache and 8641 has Altivec.
It looks as if AMCC's 460EX was based on a 603e core. Unfortunately it lacks Altivec support
IMHO any new machine should include Altivec and a nice L2 cache as standard. There are already low-end machines like Efika/Sam440. The amiga market needs a Peg2/A1-G4 substitute.
@to those who will add stupid comments about not much Altivec software being available or Altivec being useless:
There's no much Altivec software for OS4 because Eyetech took the stupid decission of using a G3 instead of G4 on uA1s. Last edited by Crumb on 15-Jan-2008 at 04:25 PM. Last edited by Crumb on 15-Jan-2008 at 04:22 PM.
_________________ The only spanish amiga news web page/club: CUAZ |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
COBRA
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 16:33:07
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Apr-2004 Posts: 1809
From: Auckland, New Zealand | | |
|
| @Crumb
Sorry I meant the 8610, I corrected my post. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hans
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 16:34:47
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 27-Dec-2003 Posts: 5122
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @Crumb
Quote:
Crumb wrote: IMHO any new machine should include Altivec and a nice L2 cache as standard. There are already low-end machines like Efika/Sam440. The amiga market needs a Peg2/A1-G4 substitute. |
Agreed. Altivec can definitely boost performance when used.
Hans
_________________ Join the Kea Campus - upgrade your skills; support my work; enjoy the Amiga corner. https://keasigmadelta.com/ - see more of my work |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ssolie
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 16:52:14
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 2755
From: Alberta, Canada | | |
|
| @takemehomegrandma I think bbrv are asking for favours again from people to "spread the news". Call me when something actually ships.  _________________ ExecSG Team Lead |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
adiaux
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 17:55:57
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 1-Jun-2006 Posts: 1249
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ssolie
Quote:
I think bbrv are asking for favours again from people to "spread the news". |
What's wrong with you? This thread is here because I wanted some reflections about this upcoming processor in the context of our community! No products are here, no products has been announced, but it's an interesting CPU and I hope it got the attention of some people, as the thread also brought AMCC's 460EX to *my* attention (looks interesting, though it has lower performance and other things embedded than the display).
Quote:
Call me when something actually ships. |
Never claimed anything ships!
Just wanted to highlight this CPU since it is a SoC that addresses what some people around here has objected against the 5xxx SoC's, namely CPU raw performance, while at the same time it integrates a display core which is *very unusual* in SoC designs and a great cost saver for system builders. It could potentially be used in LimePC-kind-of devices instead of 5121e (bottom of post), or why not (since it IMHO is a "Pegasos 3 on a chip" (or a Peg2.5 at least)) an upgraded *desktop* motherboard? And *a discussion* is not out of place since Genesi obviously has their eye on this chip, which necessarily doesn't have to mean a thing, but what's wrong with discussing potential technology in a discussion forum, especially technology that has popped up on the radar of the few who actually develops hardware?
Bläh! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
adiaux
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 18:02:43
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 1-Jun-2006 Posts: 1249
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @COBRA
Quote:
COBRA wrote: @takemehomegrandma
Looks interesting, but any info on the pricing? |
I'd say that could be a matter of negotiation...  |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Richi
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 18:25:30
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 25-Dec-2004 Posts: 158
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Hans I definitely agree! Once I read a document on how to use Altivec to decode the TCP header!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Zylesea
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 19:56:21
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 16-Mar-2004 Posts: 2265
From: Ostwestfalen, FRG | | |
|
| @COBRA
While the AMCC 460EX is definitely an intersting chip the 440 core (that is used in the 460EX) is *not* en par with the e600 core. But ibm shows impressively that the 440 core ban be capable of quite a lot to say the least (BlueGene).
_________________ My programs: via.bckrs.de MorphOS user since V0.4 (2001) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
BigGun
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 19:56:47
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 8-Aug-2005 Posts: 438
From: Germany (Black Forest) | | |
|
| @COBRA
Quote:
COBRA wrote: @billt
I think the 8610 is comparable to AMCC's 460EX, but is slightly more powerful (1.3GHz vs. 1.2GHz) with Altivec, which the 460EX does not have. Both have 32/32k L1 cache, 256MB L2 cache, DDR1/2 memory controller, 4-channel DMA and PCI-Express. The 460EX has built-in USB2.0, Gigabit Ethernet and SATA, while the 8610 has built-in LCD controller and AC97. The 460EX is considerably cheaper, with about $50 for larger quantities. |
I don't think that the 8610 and 460 are compareable by clockrate.
The 460 has TWO INTEGER INSTRUCTION UNITS The G4 has FOUR INTEGER INSTRUCTION UNITS And as you said already the G4 has ALTIVEC.
I would always expect the G4 to be 25-50% faster than the 460.
Cheers Gunnar_________________ APOLLO the new 68K : www.apollo-core.com |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
BigGun
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 20:02:40
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 8-Aug-2005 Posts: 438
From: Germany (Black Forest) | | |
|
| @billt
Quote:
billt wrote: @takemehomegrandma
It's a neat idea. For us as people wanting to play videogames and things like that, the LCD controller is probably a bit weak for the performance we;d like as desktop and gamer users. We're of course not the kind of people this chip was made for though. It's a cool idea, and I hope to see more of that sort of thing. But after PA Semi was learned about, I'm more interested in 64bit, and I believe PA Semi's power consumption is lower than the e600 core to core. I was pretty disappointed when the 8641 core power ratings were announced, was noticably higher than originally estimated. My dream is an Amiga laptop, and if we are stuck with PowerPC, then I think the PA Semi is the best choice for that for both battery life and performance. Power consumption is really my only complaint, unless they've maybe improved that since what I saw for the 8641's e600 implementation and I just haven't been paying attention anymore. |
The PA-Semi produces cetainly very nice chips. And their clever design achiving their low power consumption was very impressive when it came out.
But I wonder if 64bit is of any advantage for a Desktop or Amiga system? 64bit is really about 64bit adresses - this makes sense if you need more than 2GB of memory. If you think that this is nesssary for a desktop or Amiga system then 64bit makes sense. Otherwise 64bits is more of a disadvantage than an advantage.
Clock by clock the Freescale G4 is the PowerPC with the most integercalculation power. Clock by clock the G4 beats the G3,G5,Pa-Semi and even the POWER chips from IBM in integer performance.
_________________ APOLLO the new 68K : www.apollo-core.com |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
CodeSmith
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 15-Jan-2008 20:35:00
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 3045
From: USA | | |
|
| @ssolie
If bbrv somehow works out a deal with Hyperion and Amiga Inc to sell OS4 with their hardware, I will gladly buy most anything they sell (it would need to be at least G4+altivec and cost at most $1000 for the bare board+CPU though - not a lot to ask for).
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaPapst
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 16-Jan-2008 8:33:34
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 2-Nov-2003 Posts: 637
From: Amigavatikan | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Zylesea
|  |
Re: Freescale MPC8610 Posted on 16-Jan-2008 12:09:28
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 16-Mar-2004 Posts: 2265
From: Ostwestfalen, FRG | | |
|
| @AmigaPapst
The 8641is pretty expensive and draws some power. The 8641 is the perfect choice for network applications. _________________ My programs: via.bckrs.de MorphOS user since V0.4 (2001) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|