Poster | Thread |
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Nov-2014 20:40:05
| | [ #101 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2758
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| It is the right prometheus
mplayer -benchmark -nosound -ao null -vo null -lavdopts skiploopfilter=none /Users/intermediadc/Downloads/prometheus-trailer/Prometheus\ -\ Trailer.mp4 MPlayer 1.1-4.2.1 (C) 2000-2012 MPlayer Team192 audio & 400 video codecsCan't init Apple Remote. Playing /Users/intermediadc/Downloads/prometheus-trailer/Prometheus - Trailer.mp4.libavformat version 54.6.101 (internal)libavformat file format detected.[lavf] stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0[lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang eng VIDEO: [H264] 1920x816 24bpp 90000.000 fps 6828.3 kbps (833.5 kbyte/s) Clip info: major_brand: mp42 minor_version: 0 compatible_brands: mp42isomavc1 creation_time: 2011-12-23 08:24:51 genre: Trailer artist: 20th Fox title: Prometheus - Trailer encoder: HandBrake 4344svn 2011111001 date: 2012 Load subtitles in /Users/intermediadc/Downloads/prometheus-trailer/ ========================================================================== Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family libavcodec version 54.23.100 (internal) Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264) ========================================================================== Audio: no sound Starting playback... Unsupported PixelFormat 61 Unsupported PixelFormat 53 Unsupported PixelFormat 81 Movie-Aspect is 2.35:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect. VO: [null] 1920x816 => 1920x816 Planar YV12 V: 69.3 0/ 0 56% 0% 0.0% 0 0
BENCHMARKs: VC: 39.215s VO: 0.003s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.688s = 39.906s BENCHMARK%: VC: 98.2681% VO: 0.0081% A: 0.0000% Sys: 1.7238% = 100.0000%
Exiting... (End of file)
note only one core of four and no altivec i check in options _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Pecosbil
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 10:38:26
| | [ #102 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 11-Mar-2003 Posts: 79
From: Rovaniemi, Finland | | |
|
| @tlosm
These are from my main MorphOS machine (PowerMac G5 970FX@2GHz):
BENCHMARKs: VC: 48.719s VO: 0.007s A: 0.000s Sys: 1.074s = 49.800s BENCHMARK%: VC: 97.8293% VO: 0.0148% A: 0.0000% Sys: 2.1559% = 100.0000%
It's about 20% slower than your quad...I'm a little bit surprised, that the 970MP isn't faster than that. Well, the G5 wasn't a top-of-the-line performer in 2005 either. For example, a machine equipped with Athlon 64 3800+ is about twice as fast in this benchmark.
This is from my 6 years old Intel machine (Core2Duo E8400@4GHz):
BENCHMARKs: VC: 12.909s VO: 0.000s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.278s = 13.187s BENCHMARK%: VC: 97.8919% VO: 0.0000% A: 0.0000% Sys: 2.1081% = 100.0000% |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Rob
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 10:46:56
| | [ #103 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 20-Mar-2003 Posts: 6400
From: S.Wales | | |
|
| Has anyone been benching the network speed. I got about 20Mbit/s using the bench built into Sysmon.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 11:07:48
| | [ #104 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2758
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Pecosbil
For sure because your mplayer is using altivec like all the porting on Morphos . An example on linux PPc i have Lame encoding at 11x on Lame altivec on OSx 25x..
Quote:
This is from my 6 years old Intel machine |
How much cpu is using mplayer there ... and for sure is optimized for mmx/sse instruction.. i have to see if i can find some port optimized for altivec
I found my mplayer from macports just compiled it and is really generic port no Altivec and only one Core of 4
PS: my quad is 10y old :)
Edit im making a new altivec optimized version :) ... soon the benchmark "if everything will right in my compile" Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:29 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:11 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:10 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:10 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:10 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:09 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:09 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 11:08 AM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Pecosbil
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 12:20:04
| | [ #105 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 11-Mar-2003 Posts: 79
From: Rovaniemi, Finland | | |
|
| @tlosm
Quote:
For sure because your mplayer is using altivec like all the porting on Morphos . An example on linux PPc i have Lame encoding at 11x on Lame altivec on OSx 25x.. |
I've tried a few different builds for OSX as well, one of them was supposed to be G5 optimized. I uploaded them here, you can try them if they make any difference. None of them, however, match the speed of the MorphOS counterpart - I quess that's the advantage running it in a lightweight OS...
Quote:
How much cpu is using mplayer there ... and for sure is optimized for mmx/sse instruction |
I used a generic mplayer build. I tried the specific core2 builds, but they were only slightly faster. In other words: CPU only and only 1 core was utilized.
Quote:
PS: my quad is 10y old :) |
Well, if we're splitting hairs it's about 9 years old...first G5 Quads were released in late 2005.  But, like I wrote above, even an average AMD machine from the same era is almost twice as fast than a 2GHz G5 (in this benchmark).Last edited by Pecosbil on 29-Nov-2014 at 12:21 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 12:27:24
| | [ #106 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @ALL
Can anyone plz with WinUAE with ppc support and AmigaOS 4.use LoView to test load time of 8 and 12 mpx images?
Thank you! _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 12:32:46
| | [ #107 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9684
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
Any particular image to test? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 12:51:50
| | [ #108 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2758
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Pecosbil
For sure Morphos is more faster and optimized compared the 10.5.x ... and if i think i never will know how will be the G5 working with an Osx in 64bit it make me really nervous... Debian/lubuntu make me understand how much can do and perform this machine.
with your Mplayer exe
BENCHMARKs: VC: 38.661s VO: 0.005s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.668s = 39.334s BENCHMARK%: VC: 98.2890% VO: 0.0135% A: 0.0000% Sys: 1.6975% = 100.0000%
The old : BENCHMARKs: VC: 43.032s VO: 0.004s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.807s = 43.843s BENCHMARK%: VC: 98.1500% VO: 0.0087% A: 0.0000% Sys: 1.8413% = 100.0000%
Debian
BENCHMARKs: VC: 39.834s VO: 0.005s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.375s = 40.214s BENCHMARK%: VC: 99.0549% VO: 0.0133% A: 0.0000% Sys: 0.9317% = 100.0000%
Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 01:27 PM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 12:57 PM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 13:31:38
| | [ #109 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 14:49:45
| | [ #110 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9684
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
LoView refuses to load these images - unsupported format - and locks up. Loading other images (eg. mediacube backgrounds) works fine. Isn´t low Fast RAM problem there? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 15:25:12
| | [ #111 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @pavlor
Plz try to download some 10mpx images from different sources and tell me results(be sure to check same size) _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 15:59:32
| | [ #112 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2758
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Pecosbil
Download Cinebench 11.5 and run it on cpu only bench for your G5 and on your Intel same you can do with geekbench2 there you will have a good speed comparison :) I will do the same from my quad and after you can make comparisons :P Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 04:06 PM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 16:25:39
| | [ #113 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9684
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
LoView seems to not work with such big images for me. Maybe more than 69 MB Fast RAM is needed? Even IBrowse wasn´t able to display your pictures (other 4000x3000 were displayed without problem - still no luck in LoView). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 16:30:01
| | [ #114 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @pavlor
Mmm... Tried multiview and or some other image viewer like warpview?
EDIT: however 69 mb fast ram was really few memory...any way ti get some.more with WonUAE?
Or maybe setting a swap partition in os4? Last edited by Tuxedo on 29-Nov-2014 at 04:31 PM.
_________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 16:38:38
| | [ #115 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9684
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
Quote:
...any way ti get some.more with WonUAE? |
No way, until Hyperion supports Z3 RAM as normal fast RAM. Blizzard603e emulation allows up to 256 MB Fast RAM, but it is too slow to be useable (1/10 speed of CyberstormPPC emulation).
Quote:
Tried multiview and or some other image viewer like warpview? |
It seems to be low memory problem - there was out of memory alert with one image I tried, then lock up.
Quote:
Or maybe setting a swap partition in os4? |
I use Z3 RAM as SWAP, but it isn´t reliable - using SWAP leads in most cases to system freeze.
Can I try some smaller image.  |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Pecosbil
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 16:47:40
| | [ #116 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 11-Mar-2003 Posts: 79
From: Rovaniemi, Finland | | |
|
| @tlosm
Quote:
Download Cinebench 11.5 and run it on cpu only bench for your G5 and on your Intel same you can do with geekbench2 there you will have a good speed comparison :) I will do the same from my quad and after you can make comparisons :P |
Already done it a few years ago...let's see if I can dig up the numbers.  One thing though, you can't use anything newer than Cinebench R10 - PPC isn't supported anymore in newer releases. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 17:00:19
| | [ #117 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2758
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Pecosbil
Naa i have the 11.5 :) check here :)

HERE ALL THE BENCH! Geekbench too
Compare my Quad with Macpro 1.1 :) or with iMac (Mid 2007) Intel http://www.primatelabs.com/blog/2008/06/mac-performance-june-2008/ Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 05:05 PM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Nov-2014 at 05:03 PM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 17:01:37
| | [ #118 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @pavlor
Plz.look what was larger image loadable....
PS why blizzards emu was so slow? _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 17:33:02
| | [ #119 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9684
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
Quote:
Plz.look what was larger image loadable.... |
1920x1080 was fine. Enough?
Quote:
PS why blizzards emu was so slow? |
Strange indeed. I think only CyberstormPPC emulation was properly tested. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Nov-2014 19:34:19
| | [ #120 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @pavlor
plz try the bigger you can load...1080p wasnt so much honestly... _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|