Poster | Thread |
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 26-Apr-2017 22:09:32
| | [ #161 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2755
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @kas1e
on linux ppc x5000/20 radeonhd 6570
640x480: 119 fps 1024x768: 105 fps 1600x1200: 103 fps
with old Mesa 12 _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
daveyw
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 26-Apr-2017 23:17:09
| | [ #162 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 6-Mar-2011 Posts: 276
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @kas1e
I notice the RageMem tests all show L3 Cache: None. Doesn't the X5000 have an L3 cache?
_________________ --------------- AmigaOne X5000 P5020 2Ghz, OS 4.1 AmigaOne XE G4 800mhz, OS 4.1 A1200T 40Mhz 68040, OS 3.9 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 27-Apr-2017 21:10:40
| | [ #163 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @kas1e
for quake1 test simply download the quake1 from here:
http://os4depot.net/share/game/fps/quake.lha
unpack and after launched in quake "shell" (the window opened with "\" key), timpe:
timedemo demo1 timedemo demo2 timedemo demo3
And write back the results... With that versionI get about 24 fps in 1024x768 i all demos
Simple and straight cpu horse power test...
PS remember to close the window after alunching the test pressing again "\" and at end reopen to see the result.
EIDT: on 640x480 I got 51 on 1680x1050 I got 14
PPS For ffmpeg test to compare results we need the linked video without it have to redo the test...kets wait few days I'll try to look for something more easy to get...and retest again wuith latest ffmpeg... Last edited by Tuxedo on 27-Apr-2017 at 09:16 PM.
_________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 5:30:41
| | [ #164 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2755
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
Timedemo demo2 640x480 135fps _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 12:45:11
| | [ #165 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3551
From: Russia | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
Quake1 tests:
640x480 timedemo demo1 - 128.8 fps timedemo demo2 - 127.7 fps timedemo demo3 - 126.1 fps
800x600 timedemo demo1 - 91.7 fps timedemo demo2 - 89.8 fps timedemo demo3 - 89.7 fps
1024x768 timedemo demo1 - 61.5 fps timedemo demo2 - 59.2 fps timedemo demo3 - 60.3 fps
1280x720 timedemo demo1 - 55.2 fps timedemo demo2 - 53.1 fps timedemo demo3 - 54.4 fps
1440x900 timedemo demo1 - 40.7 fps timedemo demo2 - REPRODUCABLE CRASH ALL THE TIME timedemo demo3 - 40.0 fps
1600x1200 timedemo demo1 - 28.4 fps timedemo demo2 - REPRODUCABLE CRASH ALL THE TIME timedemo demo3 - 27.9 fps
1920x1200 timedemo demo1 - 24.2 fps timedemo demo2 - REPRODUCABLE CRASH ALL THE TIME timedemo demo3 - 23.7 fps
Last edited by kas1e on 28-Apr-2017 at 12:51 PM.
_________________ Join us to improve dopus5! zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 13:01:05
| | [ #166 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2168
From: Australia | | |
|
| AROS/Dark Places Quake engine Timedemo demo1:
640x512:
556.5 fps
1920x1200:
124.3 fps
Amithlon (software renderer)/Clickboom Quake Timedemo demo1:
320x240:
303.9 fps
640x480
122.2 fps
AROS box is 3.8ghz i7-870/geforce 9600 Amithlon box is Core2duo e5300@3.86ghz/matrox g550 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 13:24:17
| | [ #167 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3551
From: Russia | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 13:53:53
| | [ #168 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2168
From: Australia | | |
|
| @kas1e
Ah, yep, Dark Places is hardware accelerated. I'll try a software rendered version and update my figures. As for the Amithlon results, given that its about 2x the clock rate, plus has a higher IPC, along with an optimized quake port that contains asm and large caches (Intel shared cache architecture means that the single core in use inherits entire processor caches) its not too surprising the results aren't too different to those of an x5000. Last edited by fishy_fis on 28-Apr-2017 at 02:03 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 18:23:33
| | [ #169 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3551
From: Russia | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 18:53:27
| | [ #170 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2168
From: Australia | | |
|
| @kas1e
It is running an emulated CPU and 68k binaries, nothing native :) Running native is a lot faster in terms of CPU performance, but I think I'm gfx card bound as well. Its a 20 year old gfx card on a 33mhz pci bus after all. :) Last edited by fishy_fis on 28-Apr-2017 at 06:54 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 19:23:37
| | [ #171 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @kas1e & @tlosm
about 2,2x not so bad
@fishy_fis
comparing different quake versions wasnt good...on OS4 i used a quite old version now look at a ne(and openGL version)... _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 19:43:17
| | [ #172 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2350
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @all
Trying that:
http://os4depot.net/share/game/fps/glquake.lha
with:
glquake_aos4 -width 640 -height 480 I get 111.5 fps glquake_aos4 -width 1024 -height 768 I get 65.9 fps glquake_aos4 -windowmode -width 640 -height 480 I get 90.9 fps glquake_aos4 -windowmode -width 1024 -height 768 I get 41,7 fps _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 21:01:45
| | [ #173 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3551
From: Russia | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
Tried glquake:
Created ID1 directory and put those 2 .pak files, but it crahes on running all the time for me. Sometime i can run it, but then it crashes and crashes again :) Ignore DSI help a bit, but again everything crashes after. I tried it without args , from shell, from icon - crashes. Adding more stack didn't help. Tried with options like you show - same result: keep crashing.
_________________ Join us to improve dopus5! zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
jabirulo
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 22:11:15
| | [ #174 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 20-Jun-2004 Posts: 370
From: Donosti (GUIPUZCOA) | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 22:24:47
| | [ #175 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2755
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
quakegl crash on x5000 probbly because build with some cpu optimization.
@kas1e
if you have time you can try to build it on x5000 glquake of os4depot have sources in the lha
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 28-Apr-2017 22:28:32
| | [ #176 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2755
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @fishy_fis
darkplaces on x5000 linuxppc radeonhd 6570 2gb 640x480 303 fps
On quad g5 same linux version radeon r5 230 2gb 307 fps on osx leopard on quad g5 nvidia 7800gtx (2005 gpu) 680 fps
mesa are not optimized on linux ppc Last edited by tlosm on 28-Apr-2017 at 10:30 PM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Apr-2017 5:19:32
| | [ #177 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2168
From: Australia | | |
|
| @tlosm
To be honest I have absolutely zero interest in Linux or osx. If I did I'd have posted results for them too. Its an Amiga based site. OSX benchmarks on Mac hardware is as irrelevant as Windows results (which is over 2x those I get on AROS). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Apr-2017 7:04:53
| | [ #178 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2755
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @fishy_fis
probably you dont understand the point on osx i have the double of performances of linux on the same machine. on linux i have better percrormances compared amiga os... _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kas1e
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Apr-2017 7:29:33
| | [ #179 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2004 Posts: 3551
From: Russia | | |
|
| @tlosm Fishiy mean that we not in interest in linux benchmarks at all :) Not for acatemic interest, not because of any other , we there in interest in amiga kind oses :) You still put everywhere those linux benchmarks, but we all just skip them all the time, as they have no interest for all of us :) At least for most of us.
As for GlQuake, yep, will try.
@Javier Yeah, will try those tests as well.
_________________ Join us to improve dopus5! zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Benchmarks time! :D Posted on 29-Apr-2017 15:00:40
| | [ #180 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2755
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @kas1e
i understand, but my point was cant compare different hardware architecture with different os because the result will differ for missing of optimization. exampe Mesa on Aros have asm optimizations inside for x86.
about my tests i just made a true test with same architecture PPC64 and same Linux PPC version Fedora 25 Sarver and see the x5000 goes little down compared the quad in darkplace or quakespasm. but with osx comparisons my point was how much the linux ppc mesa driver was not optimized ... it mean we dont know the real power of x5000.
For sure my prefer os is os4 but on os4 have one core only running dont make understand the true machine power same is on linux but less than os4 Last edited by tlosm on 29-Apr-2017 at 03:03 PM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Apr-2017 at 03:03 PM. Last edited by tlosm on 29-Apr-2017 at 03:02 PM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|