Poster | Thread |
pavlor
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:07:17
| | [ #21 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9588
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Spectre660
That is interesting. Your 440EP is faster than 460EX. Strange. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:14:48
| | [ #22 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @pavlor
Looks like browsers on Javascript benchmar are ten times faster on x86 platform than on PowerPC. 440EP being marginally faster than 460 is meaningless when difference to x86 is at 10x scale.
_________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Antique
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:14:57
| | [ #23 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Jun-2005 Posts: 887
From: Norway | | |
|
| @nikosidis
???
Quote:
@Metalheart Lifeless piece of steel ;) Accept rules |
_________________ I'm an antique. Don't light my fuse |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Antique
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:17:37
| | [ #24 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Jun-2005 Posts: 887
From: Norway | | |
|
| @nikosidis
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 235.5ms +/- 4.3% --------------------------------------------
This is somekind of hp win7 machine. Think it's a dual core of some kind. Not sure. Ain't mine.
Quote:
@wawa It proves kind of lot as most pages use java-script. We can do other tests after this. The fact is that as you can see AROS runs as fast and faster than any other OS out there. |
_________________ I'm an antique. Don't light my fuse |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:18:15
| | [ #25 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9588
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @itix
Quote:
PowerPC. 440EP being marginally faster than 460 |
Still interesting (800 vs 1150 MHz)... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
nikosidis
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:30:12
| | [ #26 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Dec-2008 Posts: 994
From: Norway, Oslo | | |
|
| @Antique
Metal heart is an album of a band called Accept.
The lyrics is something like this.
Metal heart, Metal heart.
Lifeless piece of steal.
I'm sure metalheart know this ;) Last edited by nikosidis on 31-Mar-2012 at 11:34 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:32:27
| | [ #27 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @nikosidis so you wanna prove owb is as fast as other browsers when it comes to, what, java script on x86? quite likely. now lets someone compile it for 68k, would be fun to see what that achieves.. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:36:29
| | [ #28 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @nikosidis
On Vista I get 982.7ms +/- 0.5% with Firefox 11 and 1296.9ms with Google Chrome.
Machine is Acer TravelMate 5530 with Athlon X2 1.9GHz.
_________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
nikosidis
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:37:04
| | [ #29 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Dec-2008 Posts: 994
From: Norway, Oslo | | |
|
| @wawa From these test it has for sure proven to be very fast with AROS. I will make a video soon to demonstarte this for real and I promisse you it will give you a whow factor!!
Fair enough. I'm sure someone could do 68k version. It would be very slow on real hardware though.
Last edited by nikosidis on 31-Mar-2012 at 11:40 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:38:31
| | [ #30 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9588
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @wawa
Quote:
now lets someone compile it for 68k, would be fun to see what that achieves.. |
I fear even 100 MHz 68060 would be slow for nice browsing experience (how fast is NetSurf - without JS - on 68060?). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:55:23
| | [ #31 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| @pavlor
now, someone with X1000 should try this bench :) _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:58:05
| | [ #32 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9588
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Seiya
I would be more interested in Natami numbers. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 0:03:22
| | [ #33 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 5-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @pavlor
A kind of Magic ?
Quote:
pavlor wrote: @Spectre660
That is interesting. Your 440EP is faster than 460EX. Strange. | _________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Fab
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 0:11:32
| | [ #34 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 17-Mar-2004 Posts: 1178
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Obviously aros is much faster in this case, since jit is enabled. If there was a ppc backend in webkit, results would be about 5-10 times faster.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
terminills
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 0:13:38
| | [ #35 ] |
|
|
|
AROS Core Developer |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1472
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @nikosidis
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1718.7ms +/- 0.2% --------------------------------------------
3d: 210.7ms +/- 0.4% cube: 70.1ms +/- 0.3% morph: 57.8ms +/- 0.5% raytrace: 82.8ms +/- 0.8%
access: 209.3ms +/- 0.5% binary-trees: 27.9ms +/- 0.8% fannkuch: 96.5ms +/- 0.4% nbody: 56.2ms +/- 0.5% nsieve: 28.7ms +/- 2.9%
bitops: 139.6ms +/- 0.5% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 23.1ms +/- 1.0% bits-in-byte: 29.0ms +/- 0.0% bitwise-and: 37.6ms +/- 1.6% nsieve-bits: 49.9ms +/- 0.5%
controlflow: 15.7ms +/- 2.2% recursive: 15.7ms +/- 2.2%
crypto: 121.9ms +/- 0.8% aes: 68.9ms +/- 0.9% md5: 29.8ms +/- 2.5% sha1: 23.2ms +/- 1.3%
date: 248.4ms +/- 0.5% format-tofte: 128.3ms +/- 0.5% format-xparb: 120.1ms +/- 0.7%
math: 175.6ms +/- 0.7% cordic: 62.7ms +/- 1.9% partial-sums: 73.6ms +/- 0.5% spectral-norm: 39.3ms +/- 0.9%
regexp: 70.7ms +/- 0.7% dna: 70.7ms +/- 0.7%
string: 526.8ms +/- 0.6% base64: 62.4ms +/- 0.8% fasta: 68.8ms +/- 1.0% tagcloud: 113.6ms +/- 0.8% unpack-code: 187.1ms +/- 1.2% validate-input: 94.9ms +/- 1.1%
on my ipad2 _________________ Support AROS sponsor a developer.
"AROS is prolly illegal ~ Evert Carton" intentionally quoted out of context for dramatic effect |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tommysammy
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 5:40:02
| | [ #36 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 20-Jan-2010 Posts: 662
From: Isselburg,Germany | | |
|
| X1000 -------------------------------------------- Total: 5729.9ms +/- 0.6% --------------------------------------------
3d: 1056.2ms +/- 0.7% cube: 369.1ms +/- 1.7% morph: 399.4ms +/- 1.0% raytrace: 287.7ms +/- 1.6%
access: 1004.7ms +/- 0.5% binary-trees: 56.9ms +/- 3.9% fannkuch: 401.5ms +/- 0.9% nbody: 433.7ms +/- 1.4% nsieve: 112.6ms +/- 1.9%
bitops: 535.6ms +/- 0.8% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 111.5ms +/- 0.5% bits-in-byte: 118.3ms +/- 2.9% bitwise-and: 80.3ms +/- 0.6% nsieve-bits: 225.5ms +/- 2.3%
controlflow: 86.1ms +/- 0.7% recursive: 86.1ms +/- 0.7%
crypto: 374.5ms +/- 1.4% aes: 120.8ms +/- 1.7% md5: 121.9ms +/- 2.0% sha1: 131.8ms +/- 2.3%
date: 208.4ms +/- 2.0% format-tofte: 106.8ms +/- 2.2% format-xparb: 101.6ms +/- 2.4%
math: 930.9ms +/- 0.6% cordic: 336.3ms +/- 1.6% partial-sums: 335.2ms +/- 1.2% spectral-norm: 259.4ms +/- 0.9%
regexp: 749.7ms +/- 0.3% dna: 749.7ms +/- 0.3%
string: 783.8ms +/- 2.6% base64: 117.1ms +/- 3.1% fasta: 169.7ms +/- 3.7% tagcloud: 163.7ms +/- 2.2% unpack-code: 201.7ms +/- 3.1% validate-input: 131.6ms +/- 5.1%
X1000 running in softwaremode Last edited by tommysammy on 01-Apr-2012 at 05:41 AM.
_________________ Amiga600/Vampire2/PrismaMegaMix |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
recedent
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 8:11:49
| | [ #37 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 28-Jan-2010 Posts: 227
From: Tarnów | | |
|
| @pavlor
Now TenFourFox (7400 version) 5.0 on OSX and the same machine:
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 2992.1ms +/- 11.3% --------------------------------------------
3d: 421.0ms +/- 1.2% cube: 121.8ms +/- 2.0% morph: 45.4ms +/- 4.3% raytrace: 253.8ms +/- 0.9%
access: 280.0ms +/- 2.7% binary-trees: 111.2ms +/- 0.5% fannkuch: 86.4ms +/- 5.4% nbody: 30.7ms +/- 4.4% nsieve: 51.7ms +/- 3.1%
bitops: 85.9ms +/- 5.4% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 3.2ms +/- 17.6% bits-in-byte: 42.9ms +/- 4.2% bitwise-and: 8.0ms +/- 7.3% nsieve-bits: 31.8ms +/- 5.9%
controlflow: 124.3ms +/- 0.4% recursive: 124.3ms +/- 0.4%
crypto: 142.4ms +/- 1.6% aes: 77.0ms +/- 2.7% md5: 39.4ms +/- 1.5% sha1: 26.0ms +/- 1.8%
date: 226.4ms +/- 1.1% format-tofte: 137.8ms +/- 1.0% format-xparb: 88.6ms +/- 2.8%
math: 230.1ms +/- 16.9% cordic: 134.0ms +/- 2.8% partial-sums: 51.2ms +/- 38.7% spectral-norm: 44.9ms +/- 42.6%
regexp: 910.4ms +/- 20.7% dna: 910.4ms +/- 20.7%
string: 571.6ms +/- 20.1% base64: 29.2ms +/- 23.9% fasta: 118.7ms +/- 18.9% tagcloud: 190.2ms +/- 21.9% unpack-code: 171.9ms +/- 20.3% validate-input: 61.6ms +/- 22.4%
more to come... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 8:18:13
| | [ #38 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9588
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tommysammy
5 times faster than 440EP 800 MHz with the same JS implementation. Splendid. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
recedent
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 8:21:07
| | [ #39 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 28-Jan-2010 Posts: 227
From: Tarnów | | |
|
| and...
TenFourFox 7450 10.0.3 on OSX and Mini G4 1.5:
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1695.2ms +/- 1.1% --------------------------------------------
3d: 377.5ms +/- 2.1% cube: 181.8ms +/- 3.6% morph: 61.0ms +/- 1.1% raytrace: 134.7ms +/- 1.5%
access: 148.4ms +/- 4.9% binary-trees: 29.6ms +/- 4.9% fannkuch: 49.3ms +/- 14.7% nbody: 40.7ms +/- 1.4% nsieve: 28.8ms +/- 2.3%
bitops: 91.4ms +/- 0.7% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 8.2ms +/- 3.7% bits-in-byte: 13.5ms +/- 3.7% bitwise-and: 35.0ms +/- 1.0% nsieve-bits: 34.7ms +/- 1.0%
controlflow: 12.1ms +/- 1.9% recursive: 12.1ms +/- 1.9%
crypto: 282.2ms +/- 1.2% aes: 110.5ms +/- 1.8% md5: 140.3ms +/- 1.0% sha1: 31.4ms +/- 1.9%
date: 209.8ms +/- 1.9% format-tofte: 120.3ms +/- 3.3% format-xparb: 89.5ms +/- 1.2%
math: 139.4ms +/- 0.6% cordic: 35.8ms +/- 1.3% partial-sums: 62.0ms +/- 0.5% spectral-norm: 41.6ms +/- 1.2%
regexp: 47.9ms +/- 1.1% dna: 47.9ms +/- 1.1%
string: 386.5ms +/- 1.3% base64: 40.9ms +/- 1.5% fasta: 55.5ms +/- 1.9% tagcloud: 109.3ms +/- 2.3% unpack-code: 124.6ms +/- 1.5% validate-input: 56.2ms +/- 1.6%
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cha05e90
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 8:31:45
| | [ #40 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 18-Apr-2009 Posts: 1275
From: Germany | | |
|
| @tommysammy
Quote:
X1000 -------------------------------------------- Total: 5729.9ms +/- 0.6% -------------------------------------------- |
SAM440ep (Mini, 667 MHz) -------------------------------------------- Total: 21766.2ms +/- 0.7% AmigaOS4.1, MUIOWB 1.9 Total: 17974.6ms +/- 1.2% AmigaOS4.1, OWB 3.31 --------------------------------------------
Pegasos II (G4, 1GHz) -------------------------------------------- Total: 8787.2ms +/- 1.3% AmigaOS4.1, MUIOWB 1.9 Total: 7136.1ms +/- 2.9% MorphOS2.7, Odyssey 1.16 Total: 6757.8ms +/- 1.0% AmigaOS4.1, OWB 3.31 --------------------------------------------
Which browser did you use, Tommy? OWB or MUIOWB?_________________ X1000|II/G4|440ep|2000/060|2000/040|1000 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|