Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6080 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
61 crawler(s) on-line.
 21 guest(s) on-line.
 2 member(s) on-line.


 Karlos,  Varthall

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 Karlos:  19 secs ago
 Varthall:  4 mins ago
 t0lkien:  6 mins ago
 zipper:  7 mins ago
 amigang:  15 mins ago
 Gunnar:  19 mins ago
 Hammer:  25 mins ago
 BigD:  28 mins ago
 Bosanac:  33 mins ago
 angl01sany:  35 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga PPC Linux
      /  Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 Next Page )
PosterThread
m3x 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 9:14:43
#141 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 15-May-2003
Posts: 311
From: Bologna, Italy

@Spectre660

Board: ACube Systems Sam440ep Flex
CPU: 440ep @ 833 Mhz
RAM: DDR 333 Mhz - 512 MB
OS: Linux Debian 6 stable
Kernel: 2.6.36

Blender 2.49 takes 15:53.03 seconds (running the test from a shell)

To be noted: it's really 833 Mhz, not 733 Mhz

It seems the AOS4 Blender version is slight slower than the 2.49 version for Linux?

I'll try to find some time to update the Linux 440ep kernel to a more recent version next days

_________________
Massimiliano Tretene, ACube Systems, Soft3

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Spectre660 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 12:26:28
#142 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 5-Jun-2005
Posts: 3905
From: Unknown

@m3x

You get a 12.33% increase in performance with a 4% increase in clock speed and newer kernel .

New kernel sounds good.

And happy fifth Anniversary .keep up the good work and product support.
I think that the full potential of the Sam boards has not yet been exploited by the supported OSes and software and they are very good value for money.


Quote:

m3x wrote:
@Spectre660

Board: ACube Systems Sam440ep Flex
CPU: 440ep @ 833 Mhz
RAM: DDR 333 Mhz - 512 MB
OS: Linux Debian 6 stable
Kernel: 2.6.36

Blender 2.49 takes 15:53.03 seconds (running the test from a shell)

To be noted: it's really 833 Mhz, not 733 Mhz

It seems the AOS4 Blender version is slight slower than the 2.49 version for Linux?

I'll try to find some time to update the Linux 440ep kernel to a more recent version next days

_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Seiya 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 15:59:57
#143 ]
Super Member
Joined: 19-Aug-2006
Posts: 1427
From: Italia



_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 16:50:14
#144 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 9373
From: Unknown

@Seiya

Nice graphs. Speed increase in newer Blender versions is clearly visible.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
broadblues 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 17:14:51
#145 ]
Amiga Developer Team
Joined: 20-Jul-2004
Posts: 4434
From: Portsmouth England

@pavlor

The newest blender has qute a lot of differences thus the benchmatk may no longer be valid. Although the engine has been optimised, that may not be the only factor.

To help eliminate this a post of the resultant images might help if they are identical all is good. If they differ then the faster speed cannot be taken at face value.

Last edited by broadblues on 12-May-2012 at 05:16 PM.

_________________
BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Kronos 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 17:26:23
#146 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 2262
From: Unknown

@broadblues

Got 184s in blender 2.49b on a dual 1.8GHz Quicksilver.

Currently struggling to update to 2.62....

_________________
- We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet
- blame Canada

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Kronos 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 19:29:10
#147 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 2262
From: Unknown

down to 113sec with 2.62.....

Had to use a stopwatch as the GUI/skin decided to act up-

Last edited by Kronos on 12-May-2012 at 08:43 PM.

_________________
- We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet
- blame Canada

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tommysammy 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 20:12:29
#148 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 20-Jan-2010
Posts: 659
From: Isselburg,Germany

@Kronos

Second test
AmigaOneX1000
MintPPC
Blender2.62
test.blend with Dualcore
112 sec

_________________
Amiga600/Vampire2/PrismaMegaMix

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
andres 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 20:38:04
#149 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 3-Nov-2008
Posts: 329
From: Firenze (Italy)

@Kronos
Is a dual core G5@1.8GHz?

_________________
A1200/020+68882 - 6 MB RAM - AmigaOS 3.0

Home Recording Audio

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Kronos 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 20:43:20
#150 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 2262
From: Unknown

@andres

Quicksilver (+Sonnet CPU-upgrade).

_________________
- We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet
- blame Canada

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
andres 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 20:45:56
#151 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 3-Nov-2008
Posts: 329
From: Firenze (Italy)

@Kronos
so a dual G4@1.8 GHz?

_________________
A1200/020+68882 - 6 MB RAM - AmigaOS 3.0

Home Recording Audio

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tommysammy 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 21:14:35
#152 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 20-Jan-2010
Posts: 659
From: Isselburg,Germany

Third Test without anti-aliasing
76sec

Last edited by tommysammy on 12-May-2012 at 09:15 PM.

_________________
Amiga600/Vampire2/PrismaMegaMix

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Kronos 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 21:16:29
#153 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 2262
From: Unknown

@tommysammy

/me runs a test without rendering : 0s !!!!!!

_________________
- We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet
- blame Canada

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tommysammy 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 21:27:35
#154 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 20-Jan-2010
Posts: 659
From: Isselburg,Germany

@Kronos

Are you angry with me?

_________________
Amiga600/Vampire2/PrismaMegaMix

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rose 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 12-May-2012 22:19:53
#155 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 5-Nov-2009
Posts: 982
From: Unknown

@tommysammy

Quote:

tommysammy wrote:
Third Test without anti-aliasing
76sec


So now modifying test to make it look better?

BTW... 6.78sec without AA on sub 600€ market PC... about as relevant in this thread as that result.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
sundown 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 13-May-2012 4:41:17
#156 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-Aug-2003
Posts: 5120
From: Right here...

@Rose

Quote:
So now modifying test to make it look better?

He can modify the test any way he likes, as long as he explains how....


Quote:
BTW... 6.78sec without AA on sub 600€ market PC... about as relevant in this thread as that result.

But when it comes to running OS4, the X1000 runs circles around any other PC

_________________
Hate tends to make you look stupid...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tommysammy 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 13-May-2012 5:08:48
#157 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 20-Jan-2010
Posts: 659
From: Isselburg,Germany

Enough has been said.Now I enjoy my X1000 and playing Angry Birds

_________________
Amiga600/Vampire2/PrismaMegaMix

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
bernd_afa 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 13-May-2012 11:35:32
#158 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 14-Apr-2006
Posts: 829
From: Unknown

http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=35671&start=140&post_id=665626&order=0&viewmode=flat&pid=665585&forum=34#665585

With this values a SAM 460 have better performance /MHZ as the pa6. And the pa6 have big cache. and big cache help alot in raytracing

A X1000 clocked to 1 Ghz need need 742 sec in Blender 2.49
The Sam 460 lite need 709 sec and is faster.

A X1000 clocked to 1150 MHZ as the SAM 460 need 645 sec.
Sam 460 need 625 sec.

Last edited by bernd_afa on 13-May-2012 at 11:37 AM.
Last edited by bernd_afa on 13-May-2012 at 11:36 AM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
AP 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 13-May-2012 19:13:06
#159 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 31-Jul-2003
Posts: 615
From: Vienna/Austria

@bernd_afa:

Interesting, although I got other values.

AmigaOne X1000@1 GHz should be 745,20 sek. (which is even better for the SAM 460ex)

So a higher clocked SAM 460x would be interesting!

I don´t know, if the CPU can be over-clocked (like ACube did with the SAMflex), but if yes, this would be a good base for an "AmigaOnePlus".



_________________
AmigaOne X5000/40, 2.2 Ghz, 4 GB RAM, Radeon R9 280X, M-Audio Revolution 5.1, 240 GB SSD

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
vox 
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks
Posted on 13-May-2012 19:37:03
#160 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-Jun-2005
Posts: 3725
From: Belgrade, Serbia

@TrevorDick

Quote:
We will probably skip v1.9 for the general release. The next version will probably be 2.0 and will include installation instructions for:- MintPPC


This is great!

Could same / similar instruction be used to install Mint on SAMs?

_________________
Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 Next Page )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle