Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
15 crawler(s) on-line.
 84 guest(s) on-line.
 1 member(s) on-line.


 RobertB

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 RobertB:  3 mins ago
 Rob:  27 mins ago
 matthey:  34 mins ago
 number6:  1 hr 32 mins ago
 Karlos:  2 hrs 8 mins ago
 kolla:  2 hrs 36 mins ago
 OneTimer1:  3 hrs 5 mins ago
 OlafS25:  3 hrs 39 mins ago
 pixie:  3 hrs 51 mins ago
 outlawal2:  4 hrs 58 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga OS4 Hardware
      /  Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 )
PosterThread
minator 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 12:03:07
#81 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 23-Mar-2004
Posts: 989
From: Cambridge

Quote:
Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?



Agnilux? Er, Don't you mean Google?


BTW They were rumoured to be working on ARM server chips.

_________________
Whyzzat?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Heinz 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 12:15:27
#82 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 10-Oct-2005
Posts: 212
From: Unknown

@Hondo

Quote:

Sadly a small handfull of people can't have the thought of good news for AOS - and immediately tries to ruin even the smallest bit of joy we have...by nitpicking and putting down every effort anybody makes to make OS4 succed.


While this might be true for some of them, I don't think it fits to most of the critical voices in this thread.
Most of them just put some reality in.

My personal opinion is that I hope that AmigaOS* evolves and enter new Markets and is generally more successful.

But I also have some problems seeing the wisdom in A/eon+Hyperions strategy.

Lets take a look from the outside. They try to sell a probably super expensive Desktop Machine to a world where everybody wants to a have something portable like a netbook or a notebook. And they start selling it in the summer when everybody wants to go outside (which would be fine with a netbook).
Of course some people will want a desktop because they do some serious work (Development / Engineering etc.) But the majority of the People I know, wants a portable system.

For MorphOS it is the same problem, but at least PowerPC Macs are cheap now.
AROS is a different case because no one needs to be convinced to buy it, as it is free.


The good news is, that the Summer is near, so in a few weeks we will see how the market reacts on the x1000.




*for me that Term includes MorphOS and AROS too

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kadenaa 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 12:58:32
#83 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 6-Apr-2003
Posts: 145
From: Sydney

@Heinz

Quote:
And they start selling it in the summer when everybody wants to go outside (which would be fine with a netbook).


News flash it will only be summer for half of the world. I for one will be tucked up inside hopefully with a roaring fire and an X1000 to keep me warm this winter (Northern hemisphere summer). So what do you think they should do sell it when it is winter in both hemispheres?

Oh yes I would also like a netbook. If I can't get an OS4 netbook I will most likely get an AROS netbook once it has WIFI support, which I know is currently being worked on.

Kad.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Heinz 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 13:07:14
#84 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 10-Oct-2005
Posts: 212
From: Unknown

@kadenaa

Quote:

News flash it will only be summer for half of the world.


Oops !
Please excuse my ignorance.

Quote:

So what do you think they should do sell it when it is winter in both hemispheres?


For heating purposes, a desktop machine obviously is the better choice !
Hopefully they don't utilize this damn energy efficient PA-Semi chip.
Because then you are screwed ;)


 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
KimmoK 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 14:56:03
#85 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland

@minator

ARM sounds pretty weird for a server... for example Cisco seems to use more PPC, MIPS, etc than ARM.

But yes, Agnilux could have been doing just about anything for a server. Something big enough to attract also Google.

(Most Google servers use x86 chips, it would be interesting if they change the CPU. I know server power consumption is important issue for Google.)

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
vidarh 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 17:08:06
#86 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 4-Jan-2010
Posts: 580
From: London, UK (ex-pat; originally from Norway)

@KimmoK

Quote:
(Most Google servers use x86 chips, it would be interesting if they change the CPU. I know server power consumption is important issue for Google.)


Power / heating is major for them, yes. And they have the luxury that almost everything they run is open source or "homegrown" so they can recompile it as they see fit.

They're in an ideal position to pick and choose based on performance per watt and performance per square foot of datacentre space (which is also quite tied to power usage, due to cooling). For many parts of their system, it's ok to go with slower individual chips if they can stuff accordingly more chips into the same space.


_________________
Wiki for new/returning Amiga users - Projects: ACE basic compiler / FrexxEd / Git

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
ddni 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 19:33:37
#87 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 11-Jan-2007
Posts: 818
From: Northern Ireland

oooohhh

New pic from Trevor! (hope you dont mind me linking to this Trevor)







What does the binary say? (nowt probably!)

Last edited by ddni on 24-Apr-2010 at 07:36 PM.

_________________
AmigaOne X1000

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
KimmoK 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 24-Apr-2010 20:57:04
#88 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland

@ddni

Quite a powerplant !

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
TheKorn 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 25-Apr-2010 0:27:28
#89 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 15-Oct-2008
Posts: 171
From: Texas

@ddni

Copy this

100100111010101111011001000101111011001001001001

and paste it here

http://www.roubaixinteractive.com/PlayGround/Binary_Conversion/Binary_To_Text.asp


Last edited by TheKorn on 25-Apr-2010 at 12:31 AM.
Last edited by TheKorn on 25-Apr-2010 at 12:29 AM.
Last edited by TheKorn on 25-Apr-2010 at 12:28 AM.

_________________
Raptor BlackBird (awaiting a Miggy like OS)
Amiga 4000 3.9 / Pegasos II 4.1 F.E.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
gregthecanuck 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 25-Apr-2010 2:35:30
#90 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 30-Dec-2003
Posts: 846
From: Vancouver, Canada

Quote:

KimmoK wrote:
@minator

ARM sounds pretty weird for a server... for example Cisco seems to use more PPC, MIPS, etc than ARM.

But yes, Agnilux could have been doing just about anything for a server. Something big enough to attract also Google.

(Most Google servers use x86 chips, it would be interesting if they change the CPU. I know server power consumption is important issue for Google.)


Don't forget the PA6T was designed to scale up to 8 cores per chip. There are old slides out there showing scalability of cores (1-8), cache sizes, memory controllers and high-speed serial i/o (PCI-e, ethernet, etc).

This would certainly fit into a low-power model ideally suited for Google, known for developing their own hardware.

Of course, if this is the "chosen one" for the X1000, life could get interesting...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
KimmoK 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 26-Apr-2010 7:07:07
#91 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland

To me that PCB picture confirms that the SoC does indeed have a dual 64bit DDR2 interface!
And it would seem that xilinx is used at least for some CF signalling.
And some serdes lines really seem to go directly from the PPC SoC to the xena.

Do those Xena JTAG lines go to the southbridge GPIO lines, instead of the CPU? ... perhaps.


I wonder when we see fully built nemo board. The motherboard pictures so far have not had real xcore in place.

UPDATE:
To me it is also clear that the SoC is the same as on this one: PA6T evaluation board



@gregthecanuck

After this year we anyway have a lot of interesting PPC SoCs in the market, if everything goes well. So even if the PA6T does not continue far to the future, there will be "ok" multicore alternatives.

nemo is a very good stepping stone to more modern computing technology, learning to use (A)SMP, etc...

Interesting year, again...

Agnilux speculation:
http://apple.techwatching.com/search/agnilux

More CPU rumors: http://www.h-online.com/newsticker/news/item/Processor-Whispers-About-Dark-Clouds-and-Hot-Things-985854.html

Last edited by KimmoK on 26-Apr-2010 at 02:09 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 26-Apr-2010 at 10:00 AM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 26-Apr-2010 at 07:23 AM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 26-Apr-2010 at 07:19 AM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 26-Apr-2010 at 07:19 AM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 26-Apr-2010 at 07:12 AM.

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kadenaa 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 26-Apr-2010 12:33:40
#92 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 6-Apr-2003
Posts: 145
From: Sydney

@Heinz

Quote:
Hopefully they don't utilize this damn energy efficient PA-Semi chip. Because then you are screwed ;)


I guess I'll have to overclock the GFX card then. They usually provide good heating. I know in winter my current dual core keeps my office nice and toasty :) Unfortunately it does the same in summer too :(

Btw my wife says anyone holding out for a high end Amiga wouldn't give a stuff about what time of year it came out.

Kad.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kadenaa 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 26-Apr-2010 12:40:55
#93 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 6-Apr-2003
Posts: 145
From: Sydney

@ddni

Quote:
What does the binary say? (nowt probably!)


Alas I fear you may be right. Still nice pics. I just need to know where to send my money so I can be sure to get one of the first batch.

Kad.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
kadenaa 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 26-Apr-2010 12:56:33
#94 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 6-Apr-2003
Posts: 145
From: Sydney

@TheKorn

Thanks that was very enlightening

Kad.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
billt 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 27-Apr-2010 15:51:24
#95 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 24-Oct-2003
Posts: 3205
From: Maryland, USA

I was pondering, if Apple does eat ARM, they'll likely put a stop to new designs from competitors. No more ARM Android phones for example... Could turn into a new opportunity for PowerPC to fill such a hole.

Now, would that lead to new PA6T? Apple owns that. If they've alrady licensed it to Agnilux, maybe it's safely in good hands. If they have not already done so, would Apple complete such a license for a some-ways competitor such as Google? Not sure. The PA6T could potentially find itself in limbo.

But if Apple kills ARM's wide usage in so many things, it could give Google reason to pick up PowerPC and run with it, and see somewhat of a comeback there. Particularly for mobile applictions.

Isn't wild speculation fun?

_________________
All glory to the Hypnotoad!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Crumb 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 27-Apr-2010 16:54:05
#96 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-Mar-2003
Posts: 2209
From: Zaragoza (Aragonian State)

@Hondo

we love you too.


Leo is a realist person, something people with vaporous dreams wouldn't like

Dammy is a practical person and quite realist, AROS probably wouldn't be as advanced as it is now without him. He was the first in making real the whole "bounty" idea. I doubt MorphOS and OS4 bounties would have been done if he hadn't shown with AROS-Bounties that the idea worked.

Amigaworld would be boring without Kronos' clever arguments. You probably won't like what he writes but he never spreads FUD

Opi loves Linux but despiting that defect his arguments are always reasonable and logical

Realize likes promoting MorphOS but you won't see him flooding pages with vapour products.

Good old Pixie likes all amiga flavours and he chooses inteligent arguments. What a boring place would this be without his friendly comments.

bernd_afa is a good coder who keeps real amigas alive releasing software. His english could be better but he always tries to back up his claims with facts (usually with code tests)

Koft is hated just because he doesn't agree that xmos chip is going to offer any significant advantage to x1000

Crumb is the soul of the party and the reason you want to enter AW.net again and again instead of boring amigans.net.

_________________
The only spanish amiga news web page/club: CUAZ

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Mechanic 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 27-Apr-2010 18:59:11
#97 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 27-Jul-2003
Posts: 2007
From: Unknown

@Crumb

Quote:
blah-blah-blaaah


Geeeee Wizzzz! Who farted.....

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Hondo 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 27-Apr-2010 19:09:14
#98 ]
Super Member
Joined: 10-Apr-2003
Posts: 1370
From: Denmark

@Crumb

Oh I feel so much better now you've told me what nice guys they/you are! - infact you're all here to brighten up the day for the amiga platform....well keep it coming then!

_________________
On Planet Boing Trevor is God

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
ajs 
Re: Agnilux - possible X1000 CPU supplier?
Posted on 27-Apr-2010 19:09:40
#99 ]
Super Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 1459
From: Surrey

@TheKorn

Quote:

TheKorn wrote:
@ddni

Copy this

100100111010101111011001000101111011001001001001

and paste it here

http://www.roubaixinteractive.com/PlayGround/Binary_Conversion/Binary_To_Text.asp




Well it said 0100111101101000001000000100111001101111001000000110100101110100001000000111

0100011001010110110001101100011100110010000001101110011011110111010001101000

011010010110111001100111 ( added gaps to keep page size small)

Last edited by ajs on 27-Apr-2010 at 07:14 PM.

_________________
Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen

Some people are like slinkies. Not really good for anything but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle