Poster | Thread |
persia
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:27:34
| | [ #21 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 14-Jul-2009 Posts: 1059
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @eliyahu
Didn't we know it was the Apple chip six months ago?
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:32:51
| | [ #22 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 5-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @persia
We did not know for sure.
This should also mean that the first 250 production boards should be in the works due to the non disclosure before shipping clause . _________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
michalsc
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:37:53
| | [ #23 ] |
|
|
 |
AROS Core Developer  |
Joined: 14-Jun-2005 Posts: 346
From: Germany | | |
|
| @Phantom
Quote:
PA6T's CPU according to WikiPedia has Little/Big endian operation (bi-endian).
That means that porting to our platform will be a more easier task than now? |
No, it doesn't mean that. Porting effort does not change at all. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Karlos
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:38:40
| | [ #24 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 24-Aug-2003 Posts: 3517
From: As-sassin-aaate! As-sassin-aaate! Ooh! We forgot the ammunition! | | |
|
| @persia
Quote:
Didn't we know it was the Apple chip six months ago? |
The Pwrficient PA6T was designed by PA Semi well before they were bought by Apple, I wouldn't call it an apple chip, especially considering that apple aren't particularly bothered with PPC these days._________________ Doing stupid things for fun... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
_ThEcRoW
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:40:32
| | [ #25 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 12-Jan-2005 Posts: 833
From: Murcia (Spain) | | |
|
| Why keeping it secret until now?. I don't understand.
_________________ Amiga 1200 desktop. Apollo 030/50 Mhz 8mb ram + ClassicWB + Wb 3.1 Amiga 500 + ACA500plus 8mb + 30gb CF Raspberry Pi 3b+ and Amibian 1.4 Mac Mini G4 1GB Ram with the butterfly!! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ne_one
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:48:21
| | [ #26 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 13-Jun-2005 Posts: 905
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Brilliant. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Phantom
 |  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:56:22
| | [ #27 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 2-Aug-2007 Posts: 2047
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @_ThEcRoW
What would change if you knew it before?
You don't like surprises? _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
_ThEcRoW
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 15:58:49
| | [ #28 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 12-Jan-2005 Posts: 833
From: Murcia (Spain) | | |
|
| @Phantom
Not that i don't like surprises, but don't see the point in not wanting to tell that. Even they negated that it was a pa semi, now the say it's a pa semi. Weird.
_________________ Amiga 1200 desktop. Apollo 030/50 Mhz 8mb ram + ClassicWB + Wb 3.1 Amiga 500 + ACA500plus 8mb + 30gb CF Raspberry Pi 3b+ and Amibian 1.4 Mac Mini G4 1GB Ram with the butterfly!! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
eliyahu
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 16:02:17
| | [ #29 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 3-Mar-2010 Posts: 1899
From: Waterbury, Connecticut (USA) | | |
|
| @_ThEcRoW
Quote:
Why keeping it secret until now?. I don't understand. |
obviously i can't speak for A-EON, but having dealt with apple professionally in the past, the NDA requirements they have for you to discuss anything received from them prior to an agreed-upon announce date is unreal. of course A-EON may not be dealing with apple, i have no way of knowing. it's just an educated guess.
trevor has said many times, both publicly and privately, that A-EON is constrained from their uproc supplier on announcing details. i would suspect that constraint has now been lifted. only the A-EON principals can clear this one up officially.
that being said the PA6T was the most likely candidate based on what was announced. most folks figured that one out even before the famous 'pciscan' incident.
-- eliyahu
Last edited by eliyahu on 21-Dec-2010 at 04:03 PM.
_________________ Multicore support is still a priority |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Nibunnoichi
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 21-Dec-2010 22:07:54
| | [ #30 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 18-Nov-2004 Posts: 964
From: Roma + Lecco, Italia | | |
|
| @_ThEcRoW
Quote:
_ThEcRoW wrote: Why keeping it secret until now?. I don't understand.
|
I believe it was said various times that it wasn't their choice to keep the secret but was done by one of their partners' request.
_________________ Proud Amigan since 1987 Owner of various Commodore and a SAM440ep\OS4.1FE See them on http://retro.furinkan.org/ |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
IslandDreamer
 |  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 0:44:27
| | [ #31 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 18-Jan-2008 Posts: 71
From: Los Angeles, USA | | |
|
| I hope this question doesn't come across as a criticism, but I am very curious: why would anyone build a new system based around a discontinued processor?
I guess this approach guarantees that the X1000 will be an instant collector's item, but won't it make additional production runs impossible?
_________________ C64 / A1000 x 2 / A4000 / A4000T / iMica |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
eliyahu
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 0:47:27
| | [ #32 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 3-Mar-2010 Posts: 1899
From: Waterbury, Connecticut (USA) | | |
|
| @IslandDreamer
Quote:
I hope this question doesn't come across as a criticism, but I am very curious: why would anyone build a new system based around a discontinued processor?
I guess this approach guarantees that the X1000 will be an instant collector's item, but won't it make additional production runs impossible? |
probably because of the cachet, and also, when they started thinking about designing a machine like the X1000, the PA6T was the most performant processor in the broader power.org processor family that was attainable and to which amigaOS 4.x was portable.
i'm glad they chose it. i'd be happier still if it had shipped by now, but, hey, 'when it's done.'
as to follow-ons, ben hermans specifically mentioned the freescale QorIQ processor family (such as the P5 family) for future systems, IIRC.
-- eliyahu
Last edited by eliyahu on 22-Dec-2010 at 12:50 AM.
_________________ Multicore support is still a priority |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
eliyahu
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 0:52:04
| | [ #33 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 3-Mar-2010 Posts: 1899
From: Waterbury, Connecticut (USA) | | |
|
| @thread
from an A-EON press release this afternoon:
Quote:
A-EON Technology is pleased to finally reveal the identity of the mystery CPU powering the AmigaOne X1000. It’s none other than the uber cool PWRficient PA6T processor developed by fabless chip designer PA Semi. The PA6T-1682M is a high performance, low power, cool running dual-core, 64-bit, 2GHZ Power CPU specifically designed for embedded industrial and military applications. PA Semi was acquired by Apple in 2008 and all the indications were that they purchased the company for the technology and planned to shut down the PA Semi product line. However, following demand from military and industrial users, Apple agreed to continue supplying chips to pre-existing PA Semi customers for a limited time period. Fortunately Varisys, our hardware partner, had a long-standing relationship with PA-Semi and we were able to secure a supply of PA6T CPUs for the AmigaOne X1000 project, making it the first and most probably the last desktop computer based on the unique PA-Semi CPU technology as Apple have now closed down the PA-Semi product line. |
-- eliyahu
_________________ Multicore support is still a priority |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Painkiller
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 8:15:34
| | [ #34 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 22-Feb-2008 Posts: 26
From: Funland | | |
|
| @eliyahu
That doesn't sound good. I sure hope they have already selected a replacing CPU for the system. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Shufflepuck
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 8:34:09
| | [ #35 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 24-Sep-2009 Posts: 643
From: Home | | |
|
| @IslandDreamer
Exaclty, and having read A-EON press release I really hope that they were able to gather enough processors for at least a second batch! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Phantom
 |  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 8:35:10
| | [ #36 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 2-Aug-2007 Posts: 2047
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Shufflepuck
Yes, and what next? _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
olegil
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 8:48:37
| | [ #37 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 22-Aug-2003 Posts: 5888
From: Work | | |
|
| @Shufflepuck
I think we can deduce from that statement that they have enough for making a profit and funding a respin to a different family. It doesn't say "X1000 beta program", it says "X1000 project". Not the same thing  _________________ This weeks pet peeve: Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OldFart
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 10:12:15
| | [ #38 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Sep-2004 Posts: 3023
From: Stad; en d'r is moar ain stad en da's Stad. Makkelk zat! | | |
|
| @stychokiller
Quote:
but A-eon has only ten more days till "Late 2010" becomes "early 2011". |
Back in the heydays of massive transition to computer oriented administrations, we came across this very phenomenon and it was dealt with, with a solution which was typical for the culture of the time: -- Mondays were deleted altogether, so you would not end up debugging your Monday's code for the rest of the week. Exceptions were made in case of Public Holidays on Monday. -- Fridays on the other hand were doubled to provide for some slack towards projects which were planned to be finished by the end of the week. -- The last day of the month was replicated a number of time to provide sufficient slack for projects which were planned to be finished by the end of the month. -- The month of December got some 4 weeks extra to provide sufficient slack for projects which were scheduled to be finished by the end of the year.
The X1000 project falls within the last catagory, so by the standards of yore nothing to worry about 
Oldfart_________________ More then three levels of indigestion and you're scroomed! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Shufflepuck
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 12:26:30
| | [ #39 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 24-Sep-2009 Posts: 643
From: Home | | |
|
| Slightly off-topic, I think the PWRficient logo is great.
Would be cool to add it on a (white) X1000 case, my two cents.
I hope A-EON will also sell just the mobo.
Cheers, Shufflepuck |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
polka.
|  |
Re: OSnews.com sez: X1000 to be based on PA6T Posted on 22-Dec-2010 12:38:24
| | [ #40 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 13-Oct-2005 Posts: 1820
From: Tortuga | | |
|
| @persia
Quote:
persia wrote: @eliyahu
Didn't we know it was the Apple chip six months ago?
|
Indeed_________________ This signature is in the middle of a much needed facelift! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|