Poster | Thread |
tlosm
| |
Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 2-Nov-2020 23:31:40
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomppeli
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 2-Nov-2020 23:50:12
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 18-Jun-2004 Posts: 1652
From: Home land of Santa, sauna, sisu and salmiakki | | |
|
| @tlosm
That one is cool. That's how a computer-in-keyboard should be done at present day. I guess I want one (even I have a Pi which I don't use). But there's no resellers. Also it could have maybe more colour choices.
_________________ Rock lobster bit me. My Workbench has always preferences. X1000 + AmigaOS4.1 FE "Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system." -Seymour Cray |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Slash
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 0:07:36
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 686
From: Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK | | |
|
| @tlosm
Said it for years now: port OS4.x to ARM and work out a deal to bundle it with a Pi and you'll shift a lot of copies and gain a ton of new hobby users. Even more opportunities with something like this too; OS4.x version in beige with a licensed AMIGA logo on there.
Falls on deaf ears though. Ploughing millions into dead-on-arrival PPC boards for a handful of users seems like a gross waste of time and money to me, but what do I know _________________ This fire is burnin' and it's out of control It's not a problem you can stop, It's rock n' roll - GN'F'N'R |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Samurai_Crow
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 0:08:44
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Jan-2003 Posts: 2320
From: Minnesota, USA | | |
|
| @tlosm
The RasPi 400 is certainly a tough act to follow with a 64-bit quad-core pushing 4 GB of RAM for less than $100 including PSU, mouse and video cable.
This carrier board and compute unit pack a similar punch with a single-lane PCIe slot replacing the USB 3 controller. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 1:01:01
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| wow & that’s with Amiga colours too ...that’s what the new A1222 release should have looked like at Amiwest this year _________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 3:50:13
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| @Slash
Quote:
Falls on deaf ears though. |
This is a chicken and egg problem. Ben Hermans has said they won't port OS4.x to ARM unless there's a sufficiently large user base first, but that's never going to happen unless they do an ARM (or amd64) port first.
The best that can be done right now is to install FS-UAE or Amiberry on a Pi 400 and emulate an A1200. (In my experience emulating an A4000 uses too much CPU. Emulating a PPC is probably similar, or worse.)_________________ "Unix is supposed to fix that." -- Jay Miner |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 6:31:34
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9588
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tlosm
Computer in keyboard? How boring! Real computers have pizza box form factor. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
MEGA_RJ_MICAL
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 7:13:29
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 13-Dec-2019 Posts: 1200
From: AMIGAWORLD.NET WAS ORIGINALLY FOUNDED BY DAVID DOYLE | | |
|
| @Slash
Quote:
Slash wrote: @tlosm
Said it for years now: port OS4.x to ARM and work out a deal to bundle it with a Pi and you'll shift a lot of copies and gain a ton of new hobby users. Even more opportunities with something like this too; OS4.x version in beige with a licensed AMIGA logo on there.
Falls on deaf ears though. Ploughing millions into dead-on-arrival PPC boards for a handful of users seems like a gross waste of time and money to me, but what do I know |
Friend Slash,
the problem with the o̶w̶n̶e̶r̶s̶ robbers of Amiga-related IP is not one of hearing, it's one of intellectual capabilities.
After all, would they have to p̶u̶r̶c̶h̶a̶s̶e̶ grave-rob Intellectual Property, if they that the intellect to create their own?
Simply put: they are entirely incapable of porting OSx.y to ARM. May the show go on with more twitching of shoulders, grinning of teeth, suiting of laws, appointment of directors!
VVVVVVVVVVVVVOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Mega RJM
_________________ I HAVE ABS OF STEEL -- CAN YOU SEE ME? CAN YOU HEAR ME? OK FOR WORK |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
FairBoy
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 8:06:32
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 8-Jun-2020 Posts: 76
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tlosm Quote:
Feel more amiga then a cold ng |
Not at all to me. To me this one feels like a C64 NG, a keyboard computer with an user-port equivalent. This is what the TheC64 lacks. Unfortunately this pi 400 lacks TheC64's great keyboard and its adequate size.Last edited by FairBoy on 03-Nov-2020 at 08:09 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Turrican3
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 11:00:01
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 20-Jun-2003 Posts: 386
From: Italy | | |
|
| @tlosm
This would be a lovely (and reasonably priced, easily available) target platform for AmigaOS. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kolla
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 13:06:04
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2896
From: Trondheim, Norway | | |
|
| @bison
Quote:
Ben Hermans has said they won't port OS4.x to ARM unless there's a sufficiently large user base first. |
Ah yes, there are too few Raspberry Pi owners around.
Quote:
The best that can be done right now is to install FS-UAE or Amiberry on a Pi 400 and emulate an A1200. (In my experience emulating an A4000 uses too much CPU. Emulating a PPC is probably similar, or worse.) |
What's the difference between emulating an A1200 and emulating an A4000? It should be pretty much the same.Last edited by kolla on 03-Nov-2020 at 01:06 PM.
_________________ B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Troels
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 13:57:10
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2005
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tlosm
It's nice but not near what an NG custom design should have looked like IMHO. This looks more like an apple product of some sort.
I would have loved something compact that carried the A1200 legacy forward IF there was ever to be an all-in-one NG Amiga.
But as target HW this would be so cool, switch to new architecture should have been taken before the x1000 or x5000 though. Last edited by Troels on 03-Nov-2020 at 02:00 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
MEGA_RJ_MICAL
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 14:15:11
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 13-Dec-2019 Posts: 1200
From: AMIGAWORLD.NET WAS ORIGINALLY FOUNDED BY DAVID DOYLE | | |
|
| Quote:
Troels wrote:
It's nice but not near what an NG custom design should have looked like IMHO. This looks more like an apple product of some sort.
|
You mean that company whose products are "NG" iteration after iteration, friend Troels? Not that it actually looks like one. Because it doesn't. At all.
mrj m_________________ I HAVE ABS OF STEEL -- CAN YOU SEE ME? CAN YOU HEAR ME? OK FOR WORK |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Troels
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 14:48:54
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2005
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @MEGA_RJ_MICAL I don't speak about any companies, expect for original Commodore and their A1200 design.
There is no NG Amigas with a good Amiga like design. The big box for X1000 was OK, but not especially Amiga like _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Turrican3
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 15:05:50
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 20-Jun-2003 Posts: 386
From: Italy | | |
|
| @kolla
Quote:
Ah yes, there are too few Raspberry Pi owners around. |
Naaaaah, there are too many.
Unless it's niche, overpriced AND underpowered (by the way two or even worse just one out of the three features is not enough) it won't qualify as a viable target platform.
/s |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 15:11:50
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| for my test with PI4 i have Vulkan working in Linux ARM and Vulkan working in X86 (linux ) ... yes my PI4 is full Exagear X86-64 3D and audio working too with wine 5 and Vulkan working in wine ... ohhh yes (haking is wornderfull :P) ... there i make uae run and run good. Never test uae for linux , qemu ppc is slow . but dont test uae with ppc plugin.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
outrun1978
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 18:03:09
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 22-Feb-2015 Posts: 596
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tlosm
The Pi400 and Raspberry Pi 4 board shows exactly why there will be a constant struggle to attract fresh new people to the existing Amiga NG or MorphOS scenes.
_________________ Amigaone X5000/20 4GB Radeon RX 550 Polaris 12 AmigaOS4.1 Final Edition Update 1 Amiga 1200 Workbench 3.1.4 Amiga CD32 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: Pi 400 more ng than an ng Posted on 3-Nov-2020 22:56:13
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| @Turrican3
Quote:
This would be a lovely (and reasonably priced, easily available) target platform for AmigaOS. |
I agree. One could nitpick the details, but it's hardly worth it.
@kolla
Quote:
What's the difference between emulating an A1200 and emulating an A4000? It should be pretty much the same. |
Now that you mention it, it does seem odd. Emulating an A4000 on my i5 system takes a single core up to 105% and holds it there. I don't remember this being the case a few years ago, but 99% of the time I'm emulating an A500 to play games, so I may not have noticed it.
I suppose there could be something wrong with my configuration, or something wrong with the version of FS-UAE in the Mint repository.
@outrun1978
Quote:
The Pi400 and Raspberry Pi 4 board shows exactly why there will be a constant struggle to attract fresh new people to the existing Amiga NG or MorphOS scenes. |
Yeah, good point._________________ "Unix is supposed to fix that." -- Jay Miner |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|