how come the usb is so slow on AOS?

_________________
Modern Retro Experience

really weird..
maybe someone with an AmigaOne(with working usb) can do the same test?

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

Here we go again...

_________________
AmigaOS 4.1 FEu2 on Sam440ep-flex 800MHz 1GB RAM
C128, A500+, A1200, A1200/40, AmigaForever 2008+09+16, 5 x86/x64 boxes
Still waiting (or dreaming) for the Amiga revolution...
m4rko.com/AMIGA

Why would it be weird ?

_________________
http://www.warpdesign.fr/

Daff : why going on throwing oil on fire ? (Pourquoi continuer à jeter de l'huile sur le feu ? ).

Dont' you think this kind of Blue vs Red war could live without coming back again and again with benchmarks ?

And yes, i would say exactly the same thing if the advantage was on the side of AmigaOS 4.1

I just think, as I already said, that these tests are nothing than tests for thoses who love comparing the lentht of their.....

The real question is : is your system ok you or not ?

_________________
PowerMac G5 2,7Ghz - 2GB - Radeon 9650 - MorphOS 3.14
AmigaONE X1000, 2GB, Sapphire Radeon HD 7700
FPGA Replay + DB 68060 at 85Mhz

Sorry for not explaining...
I say weird becauseI like to see the same tests on an AmigaOne OS4.1 tio confirm the results so no possibility of "difference" due non optimised drivers or something similar can exists...
Only that...

Last edited by Tuxedo on 20-Sep-2009 at 04:41 PM.

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

@K-L: why anything negative toward OS4 (or the other way around) would mean trolling ?

Accepting what these benchs show would be a good way to improve the OS instead of crying for troll...

_________________
http://www.warpdesign.fr/

Quote:

Sorry for not explaining... I say weird becauseI like to see the same tests on an AmigaOne OS4.1 tio confirm the results so no possibility of "difference" due non optimised drivers or something similar can exists... Only that...

Well, who cares why it's slower ? Be it drivers, the core OS, the applications used, or anything else ? This test isn't supposed to determine why it is slower (I guess the developers would be the best to look for that...), but just which one is faster/slower, if any.

Fact it is slower. The reason won't change anything to that.

_________________
http://www.warpdesign.fr/

Quote:

Well, who cares why it's slower ? Be it drivers, the core OS, the applications used, or anything else ? This test isn't supposed to determine why it is slower (I guess the developers would be the best to look for that...), but just which one is faster/slower, if any.

True. As end user, i don't care who screwed, nor i am interested. Developers should take care for that, not me.

The same goes when i bought my pc; i don't care why XP is slower than linux on same mashine; be it drivers, core os or anything.

Nice work man, i am going to see the results (didn't do yet). Please, give us more tests, ignore trolls.

Question:
i see aros rising fast. Ok, it is still not very usable, but can you make some real-time tests on usability, responsivness and general feeling? I just can't find the time to install it again and play with it (my deadline is soooo close)

_________________
May the force be with you...

Hi!

What's the point of these comparisons?
There hasn't been any hardware produced for MorphOS for several years!
So who is supposed to use it. There can't be any new users - Or!?

Quote:

There hasn't been any hardware produced for MorphOS for several years!

You can still buy new efika.

The point of tests is just what it says; which OS is faster. And the pegasos is the only h/w that supports both OS'es.

We still can't know if MOS might appear on SAM.

Quote:

So who is supposed to use it. There can't be any new users - Or!?

Who knows? If i could afford amiga, i would buy pegasos+MOS because of tests like this. But this is still way more than i can afford for a toy, but than again, ppl in rest of world can afford it more easily than i can do it here...

_________________
May the force be with you...

Micro 800MHz using a1ide.device, OS4.1

Copy 34MB file from sfs partition to a 4GB USB stick: 50 sec
Copy 34MB file from a 4GB USB stick to RAM: 39 sec

USB 1.1 is slow, but not as slow as indicated in the given bench test.

Last edited by sundown on 20-Sep-2009 at 05:54 PM.

_________________
Hate tends to make you look stupid...

@Leo

for example I mean exactly that sundown test his usb and get really faster speeds than on test...
SO if you can(or someone else) reproduce all the tests on an AmigaOne and a PEg with same cpu clock and gfx board I think the comparison was much real...
Only that...
I like very much the benchmarks but made it on a single machine wasnt without much meaning to me...only that...

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

CyberGfx for OS4 please.....
That should sort out the Gfx performance..


Wol..

_________________
It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.~Albert Einstein

Well, you can usually see much variance in USB devices in general, to say it nicely...

Maybe the stick used for the test was particularly unfavorable to OS4 USB stack, and not so problematic for Poseidon. Who knows.

Leo : where did you see I blame Daff for trolling ? Except you, who are used to troll, I never blame anyone for this sport

Anyway, You should read carefully my post and not the part that only interests you before answering.

Last edited by K-L on 20-Sep-2009 at 06:41 PM.

_________________
PowerMac G5 2,7Ghz - 2GB - Radeon 9650 - MorphOS 3.14
AmigaONE X1000, 2GB, Sapphire Radeon HD 7700
FPGA Replay + DB 68060 at 85Mhz

KL : I don't throw oil on fire. It's a simple update suggested by user because some benchmark was not fair in the first version (MPlayer for exemple).

K-L: I meant you're assuming it's "throwing oil on water", "war",... and it has nothing to do with that. That's the only thing I meant.

_________________
http://www.warpdesign.fr/

@K-L

Quote:

Dont' you think this kind of Blue vs Red war could live without coming back again and again with benchmarks ?

Funny how you blame the poor messenger of the news. It's just an objective data.. and since the two systems runs on the same hardware, it is logical that the comparison has appeared...

_________________
Modern Retro Experience

@Nicsfot

Quote:

What's the point of these comparisons? There hasn't been any hardware produced for MorphOS for several years! So who is supposed to use it. There can't be any new users - Or!?

And since when the comparisons in general are allowed only if the HW is still being produced? What kind of rule is that?

_________________
Modern Retro Experience