Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6078 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)



Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Your support is needed and is appreciated as is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.

Main sections
OS4 Zone
IRC Network
AmigaWorld Radio
Top Members
Amiga Dealers
About Us
Terms of Service

IRC Channel
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
62 crawler(s) on-line.
 9 guest(s) on-line.
 2 member(s) on-line.

 Nonefornow,  ian-uk

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 Nonefornow:  1 min ago
 ian-uk:  3 mins ago
 BigD:  1 hr 5 mins ago
 Rob:  2 hrs 3 mins ago
 ggw:  2 hrs 35 mins ago
 kolla:  2 hrs 59 mins ago
 Karlos:  3 hrs 5 mins ago
 NutsAboutAmiga:  3 hrs 18 mins ago
 zipper:  4 hrs 14 mins ago
 newlight:  4 hrs 21 mins ago

Miscellaneous News   Miscellaneous News : FutureMark seeks consensus on driver 'optimisations'
   posted by _Steve_ on 13-Aug-2003 15:20:24 (1506 reads)
FutureMark will soon say just how far graphics chip companies can go to optimise their drivers to improve their 3DMark scores.

The move follows the fight between the benchmark company and Nvidia earlier this year. Having tweaked its drivers to improve 3DMark scores - widely believed to be at the expense of image quality - Nvidia was accused by FutureMark of cheating.

FutureMark later retracted much of its initial criticism, stating that Nvidia has convinced it that the drivers weren't cheats but application-specific optimisations - a highly subtle distinction at best. At what point does an optimisation become a cheat? Presumably when the performance gain is made at the expense of some other desirable quality. Plenty of users certainly felt that Nvidia had stepped beyond that line with its driver tweaks. Nvidia, understandably, claimed it hadn't.

FutureMark's guidelines are no doubt intended to answer that question, though when that answer will come, it isn't saying.

"It's something in the works. We haven't finalised it yet," said Tero Sarkkinen, FutureMark's executive VP of sales and marketing in an interview with ExtremeTech. "When it's done we'll publish it."

FutureMark is currently canvassing member companies for their views, including Nvidia, now it's a member of the 3DMark beta programme again, and its arch-rival, ATI.

He added: "What we are hoping and pursuing here is that each and every player we hope will contribute to this draft and endorse it."

That assumes a compromise can be found. It's not hard to envisage one or more companies deciding they don't like the majority view, and pulling out of the process altogether. We hope they're all mature enough to reach a decision they can all accept, but the graphics chip business is a highly competitive one - which is why so much fuss is made over the benchmarks - that we don't believe that reaching a compromise will be easy.

Source: The Register

Related Links
· More about Miscellaneous News
· News by _Steve_

Most read story about Miscellaneous News
DiscreetFX Partners Makes an Urgent Appeal to the Amiga Community

Last news about Miscellaneous News
Fabricating your own silicone chips!
Printer Friendly Page  Send this Story to a Friend

Re: FutureMark seeks consensus on driver 'optimisations
Posted on 13-Aug-2003 17:19:38
# ]

And this week on days of our Benchmarks.

Ati's open GL drivers were found sleeping with NVidia's latest Beta's.

3DFX was resuurected by a secret voodoo ceremony by school kids in the absement of the dungeon, it immediately stole the last Voodoo 5 card and the plans for the Voodoo 6 which are the only ways to send it back to where it came from. Last seen attacking owners of NVidia Graphics cards tearing off their heads and sucking their blood and screaming for Glide optimisations.

Meanwhile back at the ranch S3 has cancer, PowerVR 's face has fallen off, and Matrox is having triplets to an unknown father.

Remeber to tune in to the next episode of Days of our Benchmarks.

     Report this post  
Re: FutureMark seeks consensus on driver 'optimisations
Posted on 14-Aug-2003 2:13:53
#2 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 29-Jul-2003
Posts: 6739
From: Unknown

lol entropy!

Seriuously though, this is a sad state of affairs.


 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 was originally founded by David Doyle