A small group of people would be better at determine what would be realistic projects than what the general public would be.
So, to extend on that one a bit, what if a 'sampling' of projects were to be listed by such a group, and then allowed donors to vote on the priority of each, thus _hopefully_ balancing out 'realistic' goals with what individual donors would like to see?
I think having the community involved as much as (reasonably) possible would be key to any form of long-term success, but yeah, there are realities to be faced as well- if donation are totalling $400 USD, that isn't exactly a sane expectation to see Macromedia do a flash port
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??!