Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
37 crawler(s) on-line.
 44 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 NutsAboutAmiga:  19 mins ago
 Gunnar:  26 mins ago
 t0lkien:  27 mins ago
 retrofaza:  58 mins ago
 Rob:  1 hr 5 mins ago
 pixie:  1 hr 36 mins ago
 OlafS25:  1 hr 42 mins ago
 MarcioD:  2 hrs 9 mins ago
 kolla:  2 hrs 18 mins ago
 gryfon:  2 hrs 40 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  General Technology (No Console Threads)
      /  EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.
Register To Post

PosterThread
jahc 
Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.
Posted on 7-Sep-2006 10:29:23
#1 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-May-2003
Posts: 2959
From: Auckland, New Zealand

@Samwel

Quote:
Sammy? My name is Harry not Sammy.. You must have me confused with someone else.

Troll why? No need to troll. I now about BPlan's G5 project. It's nice but I see no relevance here because if dual core and/or dual CPU can't be used by MOS or OS4 the Pegasos3 will be slower than ACK's 7448 board running these OS'es.

It has been tested elsewhere that G4's running at the same frequency as single core G5's are about the same speed (running 32bit code). Why buy a 4 core board when the OS only can use 1 core? Which infact run about 500MHz slower than ACK's offer.

Someone on here posted a list of PPC prices the other day, and IIRC the G5's were cheaper than the 7448! I wonder if theres someone who's got time on their hands and is interested enough to want to research this.

From the OS4.0 feature list released years ago:
Quote:
Planned and already partially implemented functionality:
- Symmetric Multi-Processing (SMP): support for multiple CPUs.
- Multithreading: Tasks can consist of multiple threads of execution which are scheduled individually on a higher frequency.

I wonder how much progress Hyperion have made so far, and if their implementation will be compatible with existing stuff. They've stated for months that they're just doing boring bugfixing, and implementing the virtual memory pager, but I'm sure they're beavering away on something cool as well. :)

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
 Top | Parent

Replies
SubjectPosterDate
      Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.Samwel7-Sep-2006 13:44:06
          Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.polka.7-Sep-2006 13:48:49
              Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.Samwel7-Sep-2006 14:17:42
                  Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.tomazkid7-Sep-2006 14:20:18
                  Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.polka.7-Sep-2006 14:27:32
                      Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.bbrv7-Sep-2006 14:45:12
                          Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.jorkany7-Sep-2006 14:57:12
                          Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.ironfist7-Sep-2006 16:25:14
                          Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.tomazkid7-Sep-2006 18:13:16
                          Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.dimitros8-Sep-2006 11:26:39
                      Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.Samwel7-Sep-2006 17:08:21


PosterThread
Kronos 
Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.
Posted on 7-Sep-2006 10:58:28
#1 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 2572
From: Unknown

@Samwel

"tested elsewhere" is a nice term, and if you just search hard enough
you'll find test results that back up pretty much everything.

It might be that a G4 running at 1.7GHz (I'll just assume thats the
one you are refering to) will outperform a single core G5 running at
1.2GHz when doing CPU-intensive task.

But will that still be true when one factors in RAM-performance and
such ? And what about the price of the fish ?

Btw. all is pretty mucht theoretical, since noone has yet seen any
ACK-boards or on G5 from Genesi/bPlan, and I seriously doubt thats
gonna change anytime soon.

But let us not get to much down into the real world ....

I think noone would doubt that a 2xG5-dual-core will easily outperform
any single G4 on an HW-basis.

Now both Amigaoid-PPC-OSes can't make use of more than a single core
atm, but I see no problem letting them grow into it, just like they
have grown into 3D on the Radeons. Cos following your logic and
looking what both offered at the time of initial release every A1 and
Peg should have come with something between an S3 or Permedia instead
...

_________________
- We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet
- blame Canada

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
 Top | Parent

Replies
SubjectPosterDate
      Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.Samwel7-Sep-2006 13:57:01
          Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.DoodooHead7-Sep-2006 14:02:31


PosterThread
mr.calibra 
Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.
Posted on 7-Sep-2006 16:46:38
#1 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2005
Posts: 159
From: Unknown

@Samwel

I don't know that you have been smoking. I can't discuss with you harry. Comeback then ACK have shown their hardware. It maybe is a hoax, who knows.. Genesi have proven that they can get hardware out to the market.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
 Top | Parent

Replies
SubjectPosterDate
      Re: EFIKA, interviews, a future, etc.Samwel7-Sep-2006 17:02:21



[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle