Don't let me go search for the link, I'm sure Pavlor will post it as soon as he gets back Note: that was an example of irrelevant benchmarking not a good one. I mentioned it because posting a an irrelevant bench that depicts the PA6T badly or posting an irrelevant bench where the PA6T shines, will do US (amigans) no good. When the X1000 will be out we'll do street benchs with real desktop applications, that will indeed be helpful.
I do agree it won't be helpful since PA6T is out of production and unlikely to return. But it would be interesting, nether the less, to see that benchmark and what they had to do to exploit a weakness of the G5.
What a bunch of nonsenses are most of you debating about. CPUs that are dead, comparing them with some actual (discontinued) CPUs , then what would it be if something else was not to happen, then blame him because he said something that is against something that did not even egsisting but it sounds good and no one can say nothing against that. Not to mention that each post mutates into ppc vs. x86 / hyp vs. cusa circus.
of all this last 3 years of endless nonsenses, flame threads
Hello people... we live in 2011... 68xxx is long time dead, PPC is dead also... Let us be real, leave the past behind and remember it sometimes... stop living in past... what is wrong with you?
What is the current most selling dekstop platform? Most powerfull and most valuable in price/performance? Go, fetch it... Why to go always on harder, longer and more painfull road?
_________________ ____ ...administration is for serious people only....
9 crawler(s) on-line.
99 guest(s) on-line.
1 member(s) on-line.
damocles 
of all this last 3 years of endless nonsenses, flame threads
