@ferrels I don't think that you have too much information about real street performance of the PA6T, to claim that. Only a few benchs appeared and the source of those benchs are unreachable for clarifications on how tests were performed, if they included both cores or just one, and other questions (peopel have speculated, but no official word). I'm afraid that the only way to know how fast the PA6T is in desktop applications, will be to wait for the x1000 release. Otherwise I would refrain to talk with authority about obscure CPUs nobody spent quality time with.
Application benchmarks show that PA6T is comparable to 970FX (two CPUs).
Quote:
And the Natami wasn't designed to compete with the x1000 or any other system out there. It's a 68k retro board and will perform as such.
My point was that if price/performance ratio is argument of some Natami supporters against X1000, then price/performance ratio of Natami is much worser.
@DAX
Quote:
Don't let me go search for the link, I'm sure Pavlor will post it as soon as he gets back