Poster | Thread |
abalaban
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 12:48:58
| | [ #101 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 1-Oct-2004 Posts: 1114
From: France | | |
|
| @Krashan
The last part of my post wasn't directed specifically to you it was a general one to all of us. I dream of an (Amiga)world where we would peacefully live together close to each other talking about our hobby with passion but without hate nor disrespect. _________________ AOS 4.1 : I dream it, Hyperion did it ! Now dreaming AOS 4.2... Thank you to all devs involved for this great job !
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 12:51:31
| | [ #102 ] |
|
|
|
Amiga Developer Team |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4447
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| Well it seems that Obligement found a good way to stir up controversy and "sell" magazines! Journalists are evil, burn them all!
I'll tell you what's important to me. AmigaOS4.1 is faster on my A1 (800Mhz) than Debian is on my p3 (1.13GHz) server, except for a few brute force non gui applications like rendering where the server is slightly ahead. I'm suffering from severe Linux induced computer stress at the moment, because my A1 is all but dead. So silly infighting between people who have working Amiga Like OS systems is just irritating to read. So why did I read it? Horrific fascination I guess.... _________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
COBRA
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 12:55:42
| | [ #103 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 26-Apr-2004 Posts: 1809
From: Auckland, New Zealand | | |
|
| Quote:
On the other hand file copying with DOS command 'copy' (large, single 200 MB file, HDD -> the same HDD) is 16 MB/s on MorphOS and 12 MB/s on AmigaOS 4. |
Hmm, I actually got different results on my machine, but I don't remember exact figures now. I was testing copying of files from one SFS partition to another SFS partition (since SFS works on both OS4 and MOS natively and I don't have any FFS partitions anyway). I also get significantly higher raw speed than you. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
_analogkid_
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 13:10:15
| | [ #104 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 182
From: Here and there | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kicko
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 15:17:10
| | [ #105 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 19-Jun-2004 Posts: 5009
From: Sweden | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
petrol
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 16:13:14
| | [ #106 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 25-Jun-2004 Posts: 411
From: France | | |
|
| The real dilema is that we don't have modern and unique hardware, MorphOs or AmigaOs. All that crap things about Os team are just useless and misplaced. We have 2 great Os, respect them.
Petrol |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 18:17:02
| | [ #107 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| Quote:
Poster: Krashan Date: 11-Aug-2009 13:01:04
So why is everything so slow on OS4 then..?
Because MorphOS has better programmers. |
@Krashan
This post generated an abuse report. You have a right to your opinion so I am clearing this report.
*But*, please consider that your statement as written could very easily be construed as a purposeful insult. And I am quite sure thats why it got reported, because that would be a TOS issue. So please, feel free to state your opinions, but give some consideration as to how you convey them. And if your intention was to purposely insult just realize continuing on such a path is not going to be allowed.
Thank you. _________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
BaldGuy
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 12-Aug-2009 18:45:10
| | [ #108 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 11-Aug-2009 Posts: 28
From: Belgium | | |
|
| Quote:
So why is everything so slow on OS4 then..? |
It's all the lost hair in the OS4 developers keyboard's blocking input.
I know, how that is. _________________ AMIGA 500/EXT.FLOPPY AMIGA 1200/030/50MHz/FPU/SCSI AMIGA 4000/060/50MHz/SCSI/CYBERVISION AMIGA CD32 AMIGA CDTV AMIGA T-Shirt AMIGA Mousepad Commodore Underwear
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ikir
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 8:35:43
| | [ #109 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2002 Posts: 5647
From: Italy | | |
|
| Quote:
Call me stupid, but it seems the most obvious answer is that the Peg2 port of OS4 was rushed (it was a big surprise to everyone after all), and presumably some of the HAL (drivers/etc) are not really optimised for the Peg2 yet, especially disk access going by the benchmarks. MOS has been running on Peg2 for *years* so it is hardly surprising that it runs well on that h/w! |
Yes probably this is the best explanation, anyway this didn't excuse Hyperion for a non-optimized port. _________________ ikir
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Srbin
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 11:19:37
| | [ #110 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 11-Dec-2004 Posts: 407
From: Serbia | | |
|
| Quote:
Yes probably this is the best explanation, anyway this didn't excuse Hyperion for a non-optimized port. |
That, and the fact they sell it in full price! At least they could tell it is in beta stage, it would be fair to know that. _________________ May the force be with you...
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Srbin
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 11:24:27
| | [ #111 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 11-Dec-2004 Posts: 407
From: Serbia | | |
|
| Quote:
Because MorphOS has better programmers. @Krashan This post generated an abuse report. You have a right to your opinion so I am clearing this report. |
Please, one question; why it is an insult calling that group A have better programmers than group B?
I work as programmer and wouldn't be insulted if someone would tell me; hey, that guy makes faster code! Most likely my answer would be; let's see his code and find new optimization tricks! And steal some code too _________________ May the force be with you...
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
zerohero
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 11:38:04
| | [ #112 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 4-May-2004 Posts: 2524
From: Uddevalla, Sweden | | |
|
| @Srbin
Most likely it's not WHAT was said but HOW it was said. _________________ Common sense - So rare it's almost like a super power
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
nubechecorre
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 11:45:54
| | [ #113 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 21-Nov-2003 Posts: 895
From: San remo -Italy- | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Jupp3
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 13:34:00
| | [ #114 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 22-Feb-2007 Posts: 1225
From: Unknown | | |
|
| I hope both parties will optimize their operating systems further, no matter if it's faster or slower than the other.
Now how's that? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Interesting
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 15:25:49
| | [ #115 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 1812
From: a place & time long long ago, when things mattered. | | |
|
| I found the thread "interesting"
Quote:
Why not try and port final version of MUI, etc..? Is it so hard to cooperate? |
does MUI need to be ported? Thought I read that Os4 has ver 3.9. Morph has what 4.0? New features or a faster version?
Is there a difference between Morph ver. 1.4.5 MUI and Ver 2.0?
Last edited by Interesting on 13-Aug-2009 at 03:28 PM.
_________________ "The system no longer works " -- Young Anakin Skywalker
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
rzookol
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 16:13:06
| | [ #116 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 4-Oct-2005 Posts: 318
From: Poland, Lublin | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Samwel
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 16:28:13
| | [ #117 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 7-Apr-2004 Posts: 3404
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @rzookol
Sorry but those screenshots aren't impressing.. At all! No contrast, soft, bad color choices and generally confusing and hard to read. Looks like show off screens rather than useful.
Yes I know this has nothing to do with MUI itself.. But if MOS 2.x looks anything like this default then too bad I say. _________________ /Harry
[SOLD] µA1-C - 750GX 800MHz - 512MB - Antec Aria case
Avatar by HNL_DK!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chain-Q
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 16:41:24
| | [ #118 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 31-Jan-2005 Posts: 824
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @Interresting: Quote:
New features or a faster version? |
Both? For example, it has a very advanced list class, and even more advanced skinning capabilities (bitmap frames, alpha-transparency capable everywhere), includes an ASL requester replacement, with thumbnails and other goodies for unified system look & feel, and much more. Also significant parts of the API got obsoleted (still supported for compatibility, of course), and new API got in, to be a more convenient/modern toolkit for programmers. And it also takes more advantage of new MorphOS features where possible, hence it's faster than before. At least it should be.
Quote:
Is there a difference between Morph ver. 1.4.5 MUI and Ver 2.0? |
There is, see above. 1.4.x had 3.9 MUI just like OS4, in the first place (but had some features the OS4 version didn't, like various advanced skinning facilities). And there were "unofficial" betas of MUI4 for 1.4.5. And there are tons of stuff which already uses MUI4 features under MorphOS, since years. For example, Ambient. And then there was Sputnik, or recently OWB. These only run on 1.4.5 with the unofficial MUI4 betas. But other smaller apps also use various new things. _________________ MorphOS, classic Amiga, demoscene, and stuff "When a bridge is not enough, build a Viaduct!" "Strip the Amiga community of speculation and we can fit every forum on a 720k floppy" (by resle)
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
rzookol
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 16:43:10
| | [ #119 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 4-Oct-2005 Posts: 318
From: Poland, Lublin | | |
|
| @Samwel
de gustibus non est disputandum
ps. transparency for frames can be changed from 0-100% and text in titles has glow effect so it could be hard to read :) Last edited by rzookol on 13-Aug-2009 at 04:46 PM. Last edited by rzookol on 13-Aug-2009 at 04:45 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chain-Q
| |
Re: Comparative between AmigaOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.3 on Pegas Posted on 13-Aug-2009 17:21:52
| | [ #120 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 31-Jan-2005 Posts: 824
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @Samwel: Quote:
if MOS 2.x looks anything like this default then too bad I say. |
Yes, it's the default look (with minor tweaks maybe). If you like it or not, well, matter of taste, but if you don't like it, there are a few other predefined MUI and Intuition skins included to choose from (with a few easy clicks).Last edited by Chain-Q on 13-Aug-2009 at 05:24 PM.
_________________ MorphOS, classic Amiga, demoscene, and stuff "When a bridge is not enough, build a Viaduct!" "Strip the Amiga community of speculation and we can fit every forum on a 720k floppy" (by resle)
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|