I agree with these naming conventions suggested by Deniil715 and Tpod (i.e. AmigaONE X1500, X2000, X2500 etc.)
Why? The full Amiga scene is already fractured and confusing enough. A-EON and the X1000 have brought some order to the fracturing. This is why introducing yet another split in the naming conventions would be a step backwards, IMO.
IMO, stay the course that you set with the X1000 naming convention. And build on it.
_________________
Vic-20, C-64, C-128
Amiga 1000, 3000
AmigaOne X1000
|
22 crawler(s) on-line.
95 guest(s) on-line.
0 member(s) on-line.
jingof 
