Poster | Thread |
tomazkid
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 15:28:27
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| Me want _________________ Site admins are people too..pooff!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hans
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 15:45:43
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 27-Dec-2003 Posts: 5098
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
ikir
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 17:32:03
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2002 Posts: 5647
From: Italy | | |
|
| WE NEED A CSS CAPABLE BROWSER NOW! :-/ _________________ ikir
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pure_Amiga
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 17:49:55
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Nov-2005 Posts: 152
From: Planet earth | | |
|
| For me, Unicode is on the first priority of the missing features. A Java plug-in comes second and CSS comes third. How many of you agree with me? Last edited by pure_Amiga on 23-May-2006 at 08:49 PM.
_________________ Amiga 1200+BPPC+BVision
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
samo79
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 17:54:42
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 13-Feb-2003 Posts: 3505
From: Italy, Perugia | | |
|
| Not agree, CSS is a first step imho, without navigation become quite impossible _________________ BACK FOR THE FUTURE
http://www.betatesting.it/backforthefuture
Sam440ep Flex 800 Mhz 1 GB Ram + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 AmigaOne XE G3 800 Mhz - 640 MB Ram - Radeon 9200 SE + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hans
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 18:00:04
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 27-Dec-2003 Posts: 5098
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @pure_Amiga
Actually, I think that CSS should come first. Unicode support is nice but as most pages I visit are in English, it's not necessary for me. The number of pages with Java applets seems to be decreasing. A Flash plugin would be of much greater use as it now much more common than Java applets.
Having said all this, Unicode support is probably much easier to add then CSS and Java.
@all
Maybe it's time to bug all the browser developers again for an update. Weren't we going to get an Amizilla update a month ago? What happened to it? Are the AWeb guys in contact with Marcik to collaborate on getting KHTML working on all AmigaOS variants? Then there's Ibrowse and Paihia. We heard a little about their progress a few months ago. Hopefully they've both made some headway since then.
Hans _________________ Join the Kea Campus - upgrade your skills; support my work; enjoy the Amiga corner. https://keasigmadelta.com/ - see more of my work
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 18:15:45
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| Quote:
For me, Unicode is on the first priority of the missing features. A Java plug-in comes second and CSS and comes third. How many of you agree with me? |
CSS is the most needed. Even a java plug-in is secondary, as in reality isn't required for that many sites (likewise for flash), although good javascript support would be nice. Unicode for me sits below the others, although for any new browser efforts unicode is likely built in from the project start.
Seems like IBrowse is simply in limbo- little progress is being made there from what I can see anyways, which is unfortunate, moreso as it's a commercial project.
I still expect something useful to come from Marcik's work before we eve see IB 2.4, which will be significantly behind a KHTML based browser.. _________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
VooDoo
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 18:43:57
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 16-Jun-2003 Posts: 1503
From: Croatia | | |
|
| great..please speedUp this great project :) _________________ --
Amiga x5000 ı o2o ı 4GB RAM ı RadeonRX580 | SBlaster Audigy Fx - AmigaOS4.1 FInal Edition
A1200 sandwich :)
Croatian Amiga portal
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ssolie
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 20:33:51
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 2755
From: Alberta, Canada | | |
|
| *cough* OS4 version please *cough* _________________ ExecSG Team Lead
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pixie
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 23-May-2006 22:22:40
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 3357
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal | | |
|
| |
Status: Online! |
|
|
spotUP
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 0:23:15
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2003 Posts: 2896
From: Up Rough Demo Squad | | |
|
| and then we have this mysterious site, that i got from the topic on #amigadev http://www.webbanana.net _________________ AOS4 Betatester, Peg2, G4@1ghz, Radeon 9250 256mb, 1gb RAM.
http://www.asciiarena.com http://www.uprough.net
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
elatour
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 3:35:56
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 18-Jan-2005 Posts: 936
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| Quote:
*cough* OS4 version please *cough* |
This appears to be yet another apparent victim of a lack of available and affordable hardware for OS4. _________________ When swimming with sharks, make sure to bring lots of band-aids...
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Samwel
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 3:53:41
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 7-Apr-2004 Posts: 3404
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @elatour
Maybe we shouldn't always asume that everyone will buy A1's. This guy is a MorphOS user. I doubt he would buy a A1 if available.
But I guess he wouldn't say no to a free machine.
The author has promised to give the source to the AWeb guys as soon as he's done with his port. This probably means that we, OS4 users, will have it 4-8 months after MorphOS.
I really can't understand why he's making a MUI "plugin". Why not make it a shared library instead. Then anyone could just make a wrapper for any type of GUI, web browser or even add HQ HTML support for email clients. _________________ /Harry
[SOLD] µA1-C - 750GX 800MHz - 512MB - Antec Aria case
Avatar by HNL_DK!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
brotheris
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 4:35:27
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 4-May-2005 Posts: 193
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Quote:
I really can't understand why he's making a MUI "plugin". Why not make it a shared library instead. Then anyone could just make a wrapper for any type of GUI, web browser or even add HQ HTML support for email clients. |
Precisely that is why he will go with MUI class, you could easily share code and embed html engine into your application. MUI class is still a library. He had to choose GUI engine for his project and he chose MUI becauseit is only sensible way. Maybe he could've created yet another wrapper for some GUI libraries on Amiga, but it's silly waste of time and resources, because only MUI has the needed power :) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Samwel
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 10:23:52
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 7-Apr-2004 Posts: 3404
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @Brotheris
No it's not really.
He could have split the code and done the MUI wrapper himself. Then he would have helped alot of others wanting to use the same code with non MUI applications. But it's of course his decision to do as he pleases _________________ /Harry
[SOLD] µA1-C - 750GX 800MHz - 512MB - Antec Aria case
Avatar by HNL_DK!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
marcik
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 12:21:27
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 27-Aug-2004 Posts: 35
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
elatour
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 12:46:53
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 18-Jan-2005 Posts: 936
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| Quote:
Maybe we shouldn't always asume that everyone will buy A1's. This guy is a MorphOS user. I doubt he would buy a A1 if available. |
True enough, however, this is the reason that he gave for not having an OS4 version, and he DID have a port for 68k. _________________ When swimming with sharks, make sure to bring lots of band-aids...
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaClyde
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 14:18:05
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2007
From: Noranda Canada | | |
|
| It would be real nice if we had an OS4 version. _________________ --------- AmigaClyde
µA1-C 750GX@800 using OS4.1
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Darth_X
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 17:27:28
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 1-Jun-2003 Posts: 2997
From: Vancouver Island, Canada | | |
|
| I'm sure more stuff would be ported from mos to OS4 if OS4 ran on the Peg. _________________ Men who have girlies in their avatars are Girliemen!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Moxee
| |
Re: KHTML for MOS updated Posted on 24-May-2006 23:28:35
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 20-Aug-2003 Posts: 6291
From: County Yakima, WA State, USA | | |
|
| @ Darth_X
Quote:
I'm sure more stuff would be ported from mos to OS4 if OS4 ran on the Peg.
|
Do I detect a playful poke in the ribs?
_______________________ Moxee _________________ Moxee AmigaOne X1000 AmigaOne XE G4 I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|