Hello,

Quote:

there is also a warning file in that this should not install on MOS or OS4 because the 68k emu miss some features here(correct SSP USP stack Emulation of 68k registers).

There are a least the possibility to make a native morphOS version, using a C compiler, because this version use the original MorphOS version Or the source have changed to not do MorphOS or AOS4 version anymore ???

I said that because on the readme, previous versions have been made by Harry sintonen for Morphos.

_________________
BTW, what you have done for the amiga today ????

-A1200+Mediator+VooDoo3+060/50+96mo+SCSI-KIT
-SAM440EP-667mhz-on MapowerKC3000+AOS4.1

Amiga Docs Disks Preservation Project

@mrodfr

The source done for MOS and OS4 do broken code, when compile for 68k.try the 68k ixemul V49 Diego build long time ago.there work only very few programs with that.no owb, no ctrl+c work in shell programs and lots more.

For MOS they have a new task switcher/signal code add, to get the ixemul working on their systems.but to get this MOS ixemul working as before i must merge the old ixemul V48 taskswitcher in, but this not work on MOS or OS4 because of USP SSP and supervisor call Problem.

Last edited by bernd_afa on 12-Nov-2009 at 09:06 AM.

Quote:

The source done for MOS and OS4 do broken code, when compile for 68k.try the 68k ixemul V49 Diego build long time ago.there work only very few programs with that.no owb, no ctrl+c work in shell programs and lots more.

Here you talk about the original AOS4 and MorphOS source.

Quote:

For MOS they have a new task switcher/signal code add, to get the ixemul working on their systems.but to get this MOS ixemul working as before i must merge the old ixemul V48 taskswitcher in, but this not work on MOS or OS4 because of USP SSP and supervisor call Problem.

Here you talk about making the 68k version working on MorpHOS and Aos4, isn't it ???

And if comiling this last ixemul Native for AOS4 and morphOS and AROS, same problem ???

Sorry fo not understanding but I'm not a programmer and It's difficult for me to understand

_________________
BTW, what you have done for the amiga today ????

-A1200+Mediator+VooDoo3+060/50+96mo+SCSI-KIT
-SAM440EP-667mhz-on MapowerKC3000+AOS4.1

Amiga Docs Disks Preservation Project

@mrodfr

Changes done in bernd_afa's ixemul fork are not relevant for MorphOS and MorphOS version is still maintained by Harry Sintonen.

_________________
Amiga Developer
Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook

>Here you talk about making the 68k version working on MorpHOS and Aos4, isn't >it ???

no, i mean the MOS/OS4 taskswitcher code work only with the natice MOS or OS4 build.

but also you know, nzbget and 7z do not work on OS4 native lib.

Thank you for this update friend.

@Bernd & Diego:

Thanks!

_________________
Wanna try a wonderfull magical Amiga strategy game?
Total Chaos AGA

How about merging all release in a single lha or atleast working togheter ?

I'll be crazy just to understand how is the latest release and when it works :-/

_________________
BACK FOR THE FUTURE

http://www.betatesting.it/backforthefuture

Sam440ep Flex 800 Mhz 1 GB Ram + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6
AmigaOne XE G3 800 Mhz - 640 MB Ram - Radeon 9200 SE + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6

@bernd

A question: Why not compiling ixemul for 68020 (also or only) ???

Like that 020+ users could also use ixemul on their amiga.

_________________
BTW, what you have done for the amiga today ????

-A1200+Mediator+VooDoo3+060/50+96mo+SCSI-KIT
-SAM440EP-667mhz-on MapowerKC3000+AOS4.1

Amiga Docs Disks Preservation Project

>Like that 020+ users could also use ixemul on their amiga.

there are just no active 68020/030 users that use it.this 68020 or 68030 systems are only usefull for gaming and are too slow for daily use.I am sure they have a PC/Mac/playstation etc and can run UAE.also wirthout JIT UAE is faster as a 020.

building more versions cost more time and need testing, and when there is no active 68020 user that test use or help to find bugs, its waste time.

same is with non FPU versions.I always release testet software, release software that only compile well i do not.I have also a ixemul without FPU for 68060 that is build automatic.

also the progress that ixemul offer no limits to libnix is not complete.
I need add a command that the Unix path translaten cxan switch off, so its same as libnix.

when a program call func before open ix_UseAmigaPaths(true) or ix_UseAmigaPaths(1)then ixemul should use same file path syntax as libnix.

but of course linux programs must then a little change.

I get report that a open of /tools.info when you are at dir tools not work in ixemul as in libnix.

This function is very selden need, but i want do it perfect.and its not much work to ad that feature.

>How about merging all release in a single lha or atleast working togheter ?

I dont know what you mean.but the MOS devs dont want that modernize ixemul, so it seem no working together possible.MOS have a enhanced closesource libnix,so this cant use on 68k.

and enhance libnix to support more Linux funcs i think is not good and its also lots work.ixemul have more than 400 Unix funcs more than 68k libnix

Because libnix should be small and for Amiga only Software and ixemul is for Unix software, but the modernize i do is, that it also should allow all amiga OS funcs, so big Linux programs can too enhance with AOS function.

netsurf and ffplay show that Artur and ami_stuff have add lots amiga features to it.
for example the sdl netsurf get the videos from youtube with getvideo and ffplay can play, can use tooltypes for options etc.

Last edited by bernd_afa on 15-Nov-2009 at 11:46 AM.
Last edited by bernd_afa on 15-Nov-2009 at 11:44 AM.
Last edited by bernd_afa on 15-Nov-2009 at 11:38 AM.