| Poster | Thread |
 samo79
|  |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 11-Mar-2014 4:11:34
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
 |
Joined: 13-Feb-2003
Posts: 3505
From: Italy, Perugia | | |
|
| Any chance for an AmigaOS4 release ?
_________________
BACK FOR THE FUTURE
http://www.betatesting.it/backforthefuture
Sam440ep Flex 800 Mhz 1 GB Ram + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6
AmigaOne XE G3 800 Mhz - 640 MB Ram - Radeon 9200 SE + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 11-Mar-2014 9:09:37
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
|
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| "Any chance for an AmigaOS4 release ?"
I wonder if AOS4 3D drivers are mature enough for that...
More sane once AOS4.2 is out???
_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Lazi
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 11-Mar-2014 9:31:16
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member
 |
Joined: 5-Apr-2005
Posts: 651
From: Pomaz, Hungary | | |
|
| Quote:
Poster: KimmoK Date: 11-Mar-2014 9:09:37
"Any chance for an AmigaOS4 release ?"
I wonder if AOS4 3D drivers are mature enough for that...
More sane once AOS4.2 is out???
|
I wonder if you was sane enough when posted that...
Tell me in what area the Classic 68k AmigaOS 3D drivers are more matured then on OS4?
There is a 68k AmigaOS version of this software as it is clearly stated on the linked site. (However I haven't checked it yet :) |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 11-Mar-2014 10:08:48
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
|
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6470
From: Unknown | | |
|
| I do not know... you could ask directly. MorphOS and AROS are very similar on API level whereas AmigaOS has developed in a different direction so I could assume that support of AmigaOS is more difficult. But I do not think that the idea is impossible. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 11-Mar-2014 10:10:16
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6470
From: Unknown | | |
|
| I have looked inside yesterday. It seems that there is no 68k version inside (IDE running on 68k) but 68k is a target. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
utri007
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 11-Mar-2014 17:52:33
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member
 |
Joined: 12-Aug-2003
Posts: 1082
From: United States of Europe | | |
|
| What is this? There is a list of features, so I can make some assumptions, but some words for introducing program would be nice. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 11-Mar-2014 18:00:26
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6470
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 12-Mar-2014 6:18:26
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| @Lazi
"Tell me in what area the Classic 68k AmigaOS 3D drivers are more matured then on OS4?"
I overlooked that and now stand corrected.
So, port is doable. (then the issue might be the work needed now vs when new 3D APIs are ready for better implementation.)
If AOS4 port against 4.2beta is being made, that would be cool info to know. Last edited by KimmoK on 12-Mar-2014 at 06:19 AM.
_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Lazi
| |
Re: Antiryad Gx 3.3. now for MorphOS and AROS ARM
Posted on 12-Mar-2014 8:09:48
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member
|
Joined: 5-Apr-2005
Posts: 651
From: Pomaz, Hungary | | |
|
| Ok, I am very far from a 3D expert, but it seems to me that it is using software render on MOS.
In smaller sizes the examples are runs at decent speed on my Peg2.
The IDE is built on a custom gui and a bit clumsy, but seems to working. It uses a custom mouse pointer together with the system's one and the settings window is larger than I can see even in fullhd.
To run it on MOS is definiately a good thing. I wish there will be further development to address the problems.
Don't know if the author is reading this site, but let's encourage him in every aspect!
Try it, use it and share your thoughts about it! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
22 crawler(s) on-line.
95 guest(s) on-line.
1 member(s) on-line.
