So what's the timetable for releasing the source code?

@eliyahu

Quote:

@damocles Quote: If you have a OS4 machine, why would you need a free copy? good point.

Not necessarily. They could ask for a free copy of the next paid update or two in exchange for some good contribution to the effort.

Paul

_________________
Builder of Frankenthousand, the monster A1000
The Young Frankenthousand A1-XE G4
X5000

@persia

Quote:

So what's the timetable for releasing the source code?

I think you are reading a little too much into the announcement. No one is saying that AmigaOS source code is going to be released.

Last edited by Trixie on 27-Apr-2011 at 06:19 PM.

_________________
The Rear Window blog

AmigaOne X5000/020 @ 2GHz / 4GB RAM / Radeon RX 560 / ESI Juli@ / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition
SAM440ep-flex @ 667MHz / 1GB RAM / Radeon 9250 / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition

Quote:

Not necessarily. They could ask for a free copy of the next paid update or two in exchange for some good contribution to the effort.

This could take the form of some kind of a premium system or rather a 'hidden' bounty, in which the reward is triggered on completion/invention of some important feature. Of course thinking in these terms brings us to another problem: which feature should be considered important (worth the prize)? And how to manage projects in a way that do not lead to abuses and deepen community division. These are issues which cannot be easily solved (if at all) given the situation in which the owners of the closed source, commercial software want to benefit from the 'open-source spirit' of the community.

_________________
"Marxism must abhor nothing so much as the possibility that it becomes congealed in its current form. It is at its best when butting heads in self-criticism, and in historical thunder and lightning, it retains its strength" - Rosa Luxemburg.

Dont ride the coattail of open source

Yust do it !

Do not leasten to people telling about open xyz when you really know where to find a real Amiga Ready Open System.

_________________
AmigaONE. Haha. Just because you can put label on it does not make it Amiga.

I borrowed this comments from here (#27 & #28):
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=38873&forum=2&start=20&order=0

@theusualsuspects

Which part of "Open Amiga -- Hyperion Entertainment Blog" says lets talk sh!t and go completely off-topic about a foreign operating system that has 0.0001% to do with Amiga and AmigaOS - yes they are mutally exclusive you can't have one without the other so I ask politely - go away and spout your propoganda on your own frigging forum as you obvious don't care about this topic.

Last edited by djrikki on 27-Apr-2011 at 08:11 PM.
Last edited by djrikki on 27-Apr-2011 at 08:09 PM.

_________________

@Arko

I don´t think you want to take part in Open Amiga.

It would be better to donate some money to developers than pollute this thread with OT comments.

Well technically "Open Amiga" belongs to Amiga Inc, Hyperion could do "Open AmigaOS" if they wanted to open up the OS.....

@persia

I assume we both know that Open Amiga project was not started by Hyperion.

However, it would be interesting to know how would look "Open Amiga" in gestion of Amiga.Inc.

@persia
Quote:

Well technically "Open Amiga" belongs to Amiga Inc

Care to elaborate on that?

_________________
The Rear Window blog

AmigaOne X5000/020 @ 2GHz / 4GB RAM / Radeon RX 560 / ESI Juli@ / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition
SAM440ep-flex @ 667MHz / 1GB RAM / Radeon 9250 / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition

Quote:

don´t think you want to take part in Open Amiga.

False !
I'm taking part in an Amigaoid Real Open System

Quote:

It would be better to donate some money to developers than pollute this thread with OT comments.

False !
I have donated a lot of money

True !
There is nothing more OT On Topic than AROS when it comes to Open Amiga.

_________________
AmigaONE. Haha. Just because you can put label on it does not make it Amiga.

I borrowed this comments from here (#27 & #28):
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=38873&forum=2&start=20&order=0

Oh an annonymous cowerd has reported me as someone posting "Off Topic" well maybe I should report someone because he sonsidered me polluting something ...

Last edited by Arko on 27-Apr-2011 at 10:12 PM.
Last edited by Arko on 27-Apr-2011 at 10:12 PM.
Last edited by Arko on 27-Apr-2011 at 10:08 PM.

_________________
AmigaONE. Haha. Just because you can put label on it does not make it Amiga.

I borrowed this comments from here (#27 & #28):
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=38873&forum=2&start=20&order=0

SRY double post

Last edited by Arko on 27-Apr-2011 at 10:06 PM.

_________________
AmigaONE. Haha. Just because you can put label on it does not make it Amiga.

I borrowed this comments from here (#27 & #28):
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=38873&forum=2&start=20&order=0

@Arko

I know you're familiar with the Amiga history site's take on open amiga.

http://www.amigahistory.co.uk/1999players.html

I gather this is where you're coming from.

#6

_________________
This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author.
*Secrecy has served us so well*

@persia

Quote:

Well technically "Open Amiga" belongs to Amiga Inc

Regarding Amiga Inc. and Open Amiga:

Quote:

Gateway were prepared to open source significant parts of the AmigaOS (the exception being ARexx and other items that were licensed) as a goodwill gesture. Unfortunately for COSA, the Amino purchase, forced the group to abandon their previous efforts. In contrast to their predecessors, the new Amiga Inc. had no interest in open-sourcing the AmigaOS. Instead they would use it as a means of focussing the community towards their Tao-derived operating system.

Would that not be odd if they claimed interest in something they so despised and squashed?
Oh wait...we're talking Amiga Inc. nevermind...

#6

_________________
This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author.
*Secrecy has served us so well*

_________________
AmigaOS 4.1 FEu2 on Sam440ep-flex 800MHz 1GB RAM
C128, A500+, A1200, A1200/40, AmigaForever 2008+09+16, 5 x86/x64 boxes
Still waiting (or dreaming) for the Amiga revolution...
m4rko.com/AMIGA

@Persia

Quote:

So what's the timetable for releasing the source code?

OS4 is not going open source!!!
BUT Open Amiga projects are to be offered tp Hyperion for inclusion in OS4.
This is one of the terms of Open Amiga projects.

@Thread
If you purchase OS4, and updates, you are paying for the closed source commercial software, Open Amiga projects are open source software projects, i.e. free.

_________________
Peter Swallow.
A1XEG3-800 [IBM 750FX PowerPC], running OS4.1FE, using ac97 onboard sound.

"There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't."

I reported you Arko, sorry that the system is not showing who did but at least you know now.

Now find an AROS thread or stick to the topic.

_________________

Quote:

reported you Arko, .... Now find an AROS thread or stick to the topic

@Troells

Accept the facts:

This is not an AmigaOS4 thread, this is an comment to Open Amiga. AROS is more Open and AmigaOS4 is not Amiga.

The Mods should delete all this false titled Hyperion threads and announcements or rename them to AmigaOS4.

_________________
AmigaONE. Haha. Just because you can put label on it does not make it Amiga.

I borrowed this comments from here (#27 & #28):
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=38873&forum=2&start=20&order=0

@Arko

Quote:

AROS is more Open

Sure.

Quote:

AmigaOS4 is not Amiga.

AmigaOS4

I hope it is more clear now.