Poster | Thread |
Rudei
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 17:02:04
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 20-Nov-2002 Posts: 3589
From: Dallas, Texas | | |
|
| Thanks for that ssolie.
Rude! _________________ 2017 Camaro 2SS
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Helge
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 17:08:15
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2006 Posts: 689
From: Norway | | |
|
| This is extremely interesting and very promising, but does this mean that PowerVixxen TL will have a new type of CPU-board connector on the motherboard, rather than the used MegArray? What is the plan for this? Yes, soldering it on the motherboard is not a wise idea. We all agree on that _________________ Helge K. Leaving the Amiga in favour of a PC..
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
weirdami
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 17:20:29
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 30-Mar-2003 Posts: 231
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Maybe it means there's going to be a live demonstration on IRC. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
redfox
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 17:25:57
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 7-Mar-2003 Posts: 2078
From: Canada | | |
|
| Thanks for the update Steven.
--- redfox |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Jorge
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 18:52:04
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 20-Oct-2003 Posts: 657
From: Scottsdale, AZ | | |
|
| Quote:
will have a new type of CPU-board connector on the motherboard, rather than the used MegArray |
No, that only means these boards are not compatible with the ones used in the PowerMac (as we already know, the A1 modules won't work in the PowerMac) and vice versa. _________________ AmigaOne XE G3/933/VIA/FM801/R200 (fixed), G3SE/600/Voodoo3/Sil680/RTL8139/SBLive! (noiseless!) µA1-MK2/G3/933/R200/CMI8738 XE/G4 (broken 7450/800)
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
billt
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 19:19:10
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 24-Oct-2003 Posts: 3205
From: Maryland, USA | | |
|
| Quote:
but does this mean that PowerVixxen TL will have a new type of CPU-board connector on the motherboard, rather than the used MegArray? What is the plan for this? |
ACK says the CPU module will work on oth AmigaOne and PVTL. AmigaOne has Megarray connector. Thus, how can PVTL have different connector?
He mentioned the Mac Megarray conenctor was not an option. It's actually the same connecto, but he pin connections are different. You can physically fit a Mac CPU module into AmigaOne, but it won't work. You can physically fit an AmigaOne module into a Mac, but it won't work. _________________ All glory to the Hypnotoad!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Helge
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 20:03:34
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2006 Posts: 689
From: Norway | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
nzv58l
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 20:15:49
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 7-Oct-2003 Posts: 1640
From: Michigan | | |
|
| Quote:
It's actually the same connecto, but he pin connections are different. |
Any way to make an adapter or rewire the thing?
How different are they?
Can there be a hardware hack to make it work?
P.S. I'm not going to try this on my A1, Just wondering if it could be done!
If it can be done, then perhaps this might be a good way to get an Amiga One. Buy a PV without CPU, Buy a used PPC Mac cheap and hack the CPU card for use in the PV. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmiDog
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 20:43:23
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 1-Jun-2004 Posts: 917
From: Kumla, Sweden | | |
|
| @nzv58l
As Adam said, the PowerMac Meg-Array connector pin-out is proprietary, which means you more or less need to buy Apple to get your hands on it, and thus no one outside Apple knows how different they are... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Plaz
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 21-Jul-2006 22:54:40
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 2-Oct-2003 Posts: 1573
From: Atlanta | | |
|
| Quote:
Can there be a hardware hack to make it work? |
Some one point me to some docs (if they exist) or tell me a hack is possible and I'm on it. The more hardware we can get in the game, the better.
Plaz |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaClyde
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 1:28:16
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2007
From: Noranda Canada | | |
|
| Thanks for the update Steven. I'm sure Adam has very good news for us. _________________ --------- AmigaClyde
µA1-C 750GX@800 using OS4.1
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tonyw
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 1:47:22
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 3240
From: Sydney (of course) | | |
|
| Talking on IRC with Western hemisphere people may seem like fun, but they don't seem to do much during the "normal" hours of the day. They seem to wait until I'm asleep, then have all the fun. _________________ cheers tony
Hyperion Support Forum: http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/index.php
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Maczilla
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 3:46:01
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 19-Oct-2003 Posts: 206
From: USA | | |
|
| "thus no one outside Apple knows how different they are..."
What about the 3rd party CPU upgrade manufacturers - the meg-array Apple uses may be proprietary, but it's hardly unknown or hard to backward engineer. They (3rd party CPU upgrades) start at slightly under $160 for "sawtooth" (meg-array) macs. I've got one of these G4 CPU upgrades in the G4 mac I'm typing this on.
www.macsales.com www.daystar-tech.com www.sonnettech.com/product/default.html |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
syrtran
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 4:02:55
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 27-Apr-2003 Posts: 835
From: Farther upstate than Upstate NY | | |
|
| @AmiDog
Quote:
@nzv58l
As Adam said, the PowerMac Meg-Array connector pin-out is proprietary, which means you more or less need to buy Apple to get your hands on it, and thus no one outside Apple knows how different they are... |
These people seem to have a clue. In particular, look at the solder pads at the bottom of the picture here. Yes, that's a megarray on the other (not visible) side of the board.
The name on this card leads me to believe that it also uses megarray.
(Of course, someone would have to get the Apple info from them, or get the A1 info to them. Good luck.)
OTOH, having -two- boards (adapter and cpu) floating above the Articia on my A1 sounds like a bad idea.
Note to those who can't bother to click on the links: It's Sonnet Technologies' Encore line.
EDIT: @Maczilla - boy, I really should read an entire thread before I post. Last edited by syrtran on 22-Jul-2006 at 04:05 AM.
_________________ Tony T.
People who generalize are always wrong.
1989 - 500 / 1991 - 3000 / 1997 - Genesis Flyer 1200T / 2003 - A1XE
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
The_Editor
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 7:01:57
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 7-Mar-2003 Posts: 7629
From: 192.168.0.02 ..Pederburgh .. Iceni | | |
|
| @tonyw
I know the feeling.
I work Perm nights and it's like a library around here in the day !! _________________ ****************************************** I dont suffer from Insanity - I enjoy it
******************************************
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Wizzard_o
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 9:23:00
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 13-Sep-2004 Posts: 701
From: UK, Northern Hemisphere, Earth, Solar System, Alpha Quadrant, The Milky-Way, Universe. 1.1.1.3.44.HP | | |
|
| Ah good, more info about ACK's products! My A1200 is waiting quietly in its box, soon baby, soon....
Wizz. _________________ Rev 1D3 Amiga 1200, Apollo 1240 (40Mhz '040, 64MB RAM), Indivision MKII, Fast ATA MK V, Rapid Road USB, PCMCIA WIFI & OS 3.14
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ChrisH
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 9:52:43
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 30-Jan-2005 Posts: 6679
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Yawn, it seems ACK is back to teasing us - except for those with the time & inclination to use IRC. I wish he'd just make up his mind, and either officially tell us his current progress, or just shut up. Leaking info in dribs & drabs is not the way to be taken seriously.
Either way, since he's back to working on his hardware, it seems just childish (or down-right suspicious if you're cynically minded) to still not post any pics... _________________ Author of the PortablE programming language. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue...
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
smithy
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 10:51:20
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 28-Aug-2003 Posts: 364
From: Newcastle | | |
|
| Excuse me for being dense, but with all the comings and goings I don't really understand what products are coming out. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but there will be:
1. A CPU card for AmigaOnes 2. A PPC CPU card for A1200 3. A PPC CPU card for A4000 4. A standalone machine
For those of us with no AmigaOnes and broken A1200s option 4 is the best step. And indeed, from what Hyperion say, the only way OS4 will be released is with available and non-classic hardware. So this standalone computer is the most important for everyone. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
-Sam-
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 11:14:03
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Apr-2003 Posts: 3040
From: Yorkshire Dales, United Knigdom | | |
|
| Good to hear that ACK is continuing development. I will be very interested in purchasing one of these boards when they are finished.
So good to see them ignore the handful of negative comments and continue their work. _________________ Sam
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Desler
| |
Re: ACK CPU Module Design Rationale Posted on 22-Jul-2006 11:25:12
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 11-Mar-2003 Posts: 190
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ChrisH It wasnt ACK who posted this news item. Adam just posted that snippet of information in a thread that were becoming a bit to speculative. That Ssolie decided to make it a news item is just a service for the ones not reading all the forums. You would find that if you had a well founded question for Adam you would probably get it answered by meeting him on his terms. That is IRC or just by mailing him directly. Ive done both and got quick and concise answers from Adam. I know we all would like pictures but think of the consequences. Remember when Troika published pictures. Each time the pictures were analyzed by everyone and in the end they were all called a hoax by at least one person (Whether they are or not is not an issue in this thread however) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|